|
Post by BoJack Hogan on Jan 25, 2016 11:16:01 GMT -5
I saw it from 10 miles away, but aside from the terrible beat down that took him out of the match for 40 minutes so he could take a nap, the ending is exactly as I'd have booked it. FINALLY a logical progression of the story. I'll take the over the hill Triple H over WWE's Marty Stu any day. Roman's obviously taking the belt at Wrestlemania, at least things can not suck terribly for the next 70 days.
|
|
|
Post by #DI-WHY? on Jan 25, 2016 11:21:35 GMT -5
I'm excited to see HHH's plates
|
|
|
Post by The neferious brotha Hargrove on Jan 25, 2016 11:21:59 GMT -5
I honestly feel bad for triple H , but really I don't , his a bunghole , that had to his way to top , but still never became the man , because there will always be better in ring proformers and people better than him on the mic , he buried half the roster from 2002-now , still never became the top face of the company , and its sad that Vince is probably letting " so called pass the torch " as if he his the man , and really his just the replacement for Cena, he played 2nd best to Rock/Austin , and 2nd best to Cena , and never became the man
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jan 25, 2016 11:27:05 GMT -5
I like Triple H. In principle, I don't have an issue with him being champion.
What I do have an issue with, however, is how this ends up. Triple H vs. Roman Reigns is the least interesting Wrestlemania main event I can possibly think of, and nothing they do is going to make me care about it. Because of that, I groaned when he won the title. Not because he won, but because I know exactly how this story ends.
|
|
jakksking1
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 2, 2011 14:45:41 GMT -5
Posts: 2,843
|
Post by jakksking1 on Jan 25, 2016 11:50:16 GMT -5
So basically the OP thinks HHH ruined mania last year because he won, and is going to ruin Mania this year because he is going to lose?
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Jan 25, 2016 12:06:13 GMT -5
Triple H is wrestling's biggest legend in his and Vince's own minds only. They think he's on that same pedestal as Undertaker, Lesnar, Rock, etc. in that fans are interested in seeing him as a special attraction a few times a year, when the fact of the matter is that most fans don't look at him that way. Wrestlemania wouldn't lack anything if Triple H wasn't there. And this is the main reason that, despite optimism that this company is in great hands with Hunter eventually running things, I'm extremely skeptical.
|
|
|
Post by 0,Y on Jan 25, 2016 12:06:25 GMT -5
It made perfect sense and it's awesome.
|
|
|
Post by Irish Wrestling Entertainment on Jan 25, 2016 12:13:45 GMT -5
I like Triple H. In principle, I don't have an issue with him being champion. What I do have an issue with, however, is how this ends up. Triple H vs. Roman Reigns is the least interesting Wrestlemania main event I can possibly think of, and nothing they do is going to make me care about it. Because of that, I groaned when he won the title. Not because he won, but because I know exactly how this story ends. That's exactly what I thought. In normal circumstances, it would have been a mark out moment for HHH to win. But these aren't normal circumstances - there is only one end goal here and Triple H is only being used as a means to achieve that. The inevitability of the next three months is depressing. I'm sure I'll find something on the bottom end of the card to keep me entertained though. This roster is hugely stacked. But Reigns will leave a sour taste every week.
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jan 25, 2016 12:19:34 GMT -5
I like Triple H. In principle, I don't have an issue with him being champion. What I do have an issue with, however, is how this ends up. Triple H vs. Roman Reigns is the least interesting Wrestlemania main event I can possibly think of, and nothing they do is going to make me care about it. Because of that, I groaned when he won the title. Not because he won, but because I know exactly how this story ends. That's exactly what I thought. In normal circumstances, it would have been a mark out moment for HHH to win. But these aren't normal circumstances - there is only one end goal here and Triple H is only being used as a means to achieve that. The inevitability of the next three months is depressing. I'm sure I'll find something on the bottom end of the card to keep me entertained though. This roster is hugely stacked. But Reigns will leave a sour taste every week. Yep. The moment the Rumble ended last night, I felt myself looking past Wrestlemania instead of looking forward to it. If they're going to shove Roman down my throat until I choke, just get me past this fabricated, garbage redemption/climb story. No one is buying it, and it should have ended months ago.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Jan 25, 2016 12:27:41 GMT -5
That's literally the problem with this, it literally all but confirms how Wrestlemania ends and it's only the first night on the Road to Wrestlemania. They even gave us an incline of false hope that we could have gotten Ambrose vs Reigns which made it even worse. This was literally the most predictable Rumble, and while I would love to have gotten excited for Triple H winning, I was only depressed watching as I already know how this ends.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 1, 2024 23:21:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2016 12:28:15 GMT -5
Triple H is the most credible person on the roster
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Jan 25, 2016 12:30:04 GMT -5
Triple H is wrestling's biggest legend in his and Vince's own minds only. They think he's on that same pedestal as Undertaker, Lesnar, Rock, etc. in that fans are interested in seeing him as a special attraction a few times a year, when the fact of the matter is that most fans don't look at him that way. Wrestlemania wouldn't lack anything if Triple H wasn't there. And this is the main reason that, despite optimism that this company is in great hands with Hunter eventually running things, I'm extremely skeptical. "Most fans"....yeah, if you say so. This forum doesn't account to "most fans"
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Jan 25, 2016 12:30:47 GMT -5
That's literally the problem with this, it literally all but confirms how Wrestlemania ends and it's only the first night on the Road to Wrestlemania. They even gave us an incline of false hope that we could have gotten Ambrose vs Reigns which made it even worse. This was literally the most predictable Rumble, and while I would love to have gotten excited for Triple H winning, I was only depressed watching as I already know how this ends. The last two years begs to differ.
|
|
|
Post by Irish Wrestling Entertainment on Jan 25, 2016 12:36:44 GMT -5
That's literally the problem with this, it literally all but confirms how Wrestlemania ends and it's only the first night on the Road to Wrestlemania. They even gave us an incline of false hope that we could have gotten Ambrose vs Reigns which made it even worse. This was literally the most predictable Rumble, and while I would love to have gotten excited for Triple H winning, I was only depressed watching as I already know how this ends. I'm still unconvinced that WWE will pull the trigger on Roman winning at Wrestlemania. It'll take serious guts for them to go with it.. knowing that it will cause immense amounts of negative fan reaction and bad PR. People spend thousands and travel the globe to see Wrestlemania.. and who would want to do it again if they know that WWE don't give a crap about what they want? The Rock is at Wrestlemania, that is confirmed. The Rock will not be 'wasted' in a match of his own when he can be used to help put Reigns over (WWE's mind). As I said in another thread, I still wouldn't be surprised to see Rock screw Reigns at Mania and help Triple H win.
|
|
johnnyaustin21
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 21, 2011 14:16:20 GMT -5
Posts: 1,609
|
Post by johnnyaustin21 on Jan 25, 2016 12:39:27 GMT -5
Sure is a lot of hate again on Triple H.Keep in mind more then likely the only reason he's champion again is to put over Reigns and also do to the fact that Cena,Orton,Bryan,Rollins and Sting are all hurt and will miss Wrestlemania.It make sense from the storyline their telling for Triple H to be champion,I would have went different route with Reigns retaining at the Rumble and Triple H beating him down post match to set up their bout at Wrestlemania.I don't think you had to put the title on 46 year old semi retired sense 2010 Triple H to tell the same storyline.
But again not to big of a issue for me sense I am a die hard mark for Triple H and my current favorite is Roman Reigns so I am very much looking forward to their match up at Wrestlemania.bty to whomever posted that Triple H isn't that big of a star needs to GTFO.Triple H is clearly in the top ten or fifteen all time biggest stars in WWE history.Some of you also forgot all of the great work he's done behind the scenes over the last few years making up with Bruno,Warrior and Savage's family,starting NXT and bring in the likes of Styles,Owens,Joe,Balor,Zayn,Nakamura,Aries...ect this was all his doing for the fans.
|
|
johnnyaustin21
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 21, 2011 14:16:20 GMT -5
Posts: 1,609
|
Post by johnnyaustin21 on Jan 25, 2016 12:45:28 GMT -5
Also forgot to add that Triple H/Reigns wasn't in the cards at all for Wrestlemania based on the rumors all the way until they got hit by so many injuries.The rumors after Wrestlemania 31 threw most of the year where Rock/Triple H or Rock/Rousey .Vs Triple H/Stephanie at Mania this year and once they got wind of Rock not being able to wrestle do to him filming Baywatch reports where they where then head in the direction of Triple H/Rollins but he got hurt along with Cena,Orton,Bryan and Sting.That real cut down on the amount of stars and marquee matches they could use to try and sell WM 32.'
With that all said and stepping back from being a Smark real the two biggest matches they could then make for WM 32 where either Triple H/Reigns or Reigns/Taker and thats pretty much it.They've done Taker/Brock,Brock/Reigns,Triple H/Brock...ect so those two are the freshest and biggest match ups they had left.
|
|
|
Post by Word™ on Jan 25, 2016 12:53:52 GMT -5
I would look forward to watching Raw with Triple H as champion, if this wasn't only happening so Triple H could put of Roman Reigns at Wrestlemania.
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jan 25, 2016 13:01:45 GMT -5
That's literally the problem with this, it literally all but confirms how Wrestlemania ends and it's only the first night on the Road to Wrestlemania. They even gave us an incline of false hope that we could have gotten Ambrose vs Reigns which made it even worse. This was literally the most predictable Rumble, and while I would love to have gotten excited for Triple H winning, I was only depressed watching as I already know how this ends. I'm still unconvinced that WWE will pull the trigger on Roman winning at Wrestlemania. It'll take serious guts for them to go with it.. knowing that it will cause immense amounts of negative fan reaction and bad PR. People spend thousands and travel the globe to see Wrestlemania.. and who would want to do it again if they know that WWE don't give a crap about what they want? The Rock is at Wrestlemania, that is confirmed. The Rock will not be 'wasted' in a match of his own when he can be used to help put Reigns over (WWE's mind). As I said in another thread, I still wouldn't be surprised to see Rock screw Reigns at Mania and help Triple H win. WWE has pretty much proven in recent weeks/months that they only care about one night, one moment at a time. I fully expect them to use The Rock's goodwill to get Roman Reigns over at Wrestlemania. Maybe even Ronda Rousey if she's available. Then, the following night, Roman will get booed out the building again, and they'll start over, looking for some other legacy star they can leech off of. If they don't have one lined up, they'll just use their usual fallback, Dean Ambrose. If they can get Roman Reigns cheered at Wrestlemania, they'll consider it a massive success, regardless of the fact that it will be by proxy, and that it'll have completely dissolved into hatred the following night. One night. One moment.
|
|
|
Post by mikey1974 on Jan 25, 2016 13:03:00 GMT -5
I know I'm biased. But the truth is, had it not been for the mass amounts of injuries, Triple H would not be champion. It would most likely have been John Cena or Randy Orton. Do you think people would have been happier with another John Cena title run? Tying Ric Flair's record? Also if you watch that Silicon Valley special that aired last night, and you still think Sting was a miserable old man forced into jobbing out, then there is nothing I could say to help you. In the backstage clips Sting looked to be as happy as I've seen him in years. Sting also says on his DVD that he was coming in to (paraphrasing) "go out on his back. Because that is what you are supposed to do when you retire". So while it's okay to be disappointed he lost, it's time to move on passed the "Evil Triple H made him lose theory". Agreed. Whatever palns they originally had were destroyed once people started going out. They need a viable World Champion going into Mania, and outside of Brock, they didn't really have one. Couple years ago the Rock came back and won the Title at the Rumble, only worked one match between RR and Mania, and we all knew he was given it so he could drop it to Cena. And most people were fine with that. So what's different here?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 1, 2024 23:21:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2016 13:19:18 GMT -5
I actually like HHH as champ....or Anyone beside Roman Rains.
|
|