|
Post by marino13 on Jan 30, 2016 10:05:05 GMT -5
For the Wyatts I'd go with... Strowman vs Big Show (Fastlane match ends in double DQ. Rematch for WM, Strowman easily wins in a short match) Taker & Kane vs Harper & Rowan (Taker has a lighter work load. Plus either team can win. Kane could take the pin-fall if need be) Bray vs Brock (All four Wyatt's are at ringside. I'm sure Brock would win anyhow) no reason they have to waste 3 matches on them. They lose every feud. Only way Brock vs Bray would be even remotely intriguing if it is with all wyatts around the ring and he destroys all of them before getting to Bray. taker and kane easily beat the wyatts at survivor series. Now they will fight them again with no bray? ?? Not even wwe is that clueless When half your roster is hurt, you have to fill the card somehow.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 27, 2024 15:15:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2016 10:29:03 GMT -5
I don't think it will be THAT bad. Sure it will suck ass, but the atmosphere in that place is gonna be insane.
|
|
|
Post by Yayo on Jan 30, 2016 10:44:58 GMT -5
Strowman is the first Vince-pet-project-that-can't-wrestle in awhile. Not surprised by this, but I was really hoping we were moving away the the Khalis, Heidenreichs, and Mason Ryans
|
|
|
Post by Yambag Jones on Jan 30, 2016 11:27:46 GMT -5
tl;dr
Lesnar & Undertaker vs The Wyatt Family at WrestleMania. Just throwing that out there.
I'd be interested to see a reluctant, unholy alliance between Lesnar and Undertaker. The build up would be great. Show their entire history including their early matches and show the timeline of them facing off (even the UFC confrontation). Can they work together after Lesnar ended the streak and their 2015 showdowns?
Even the match itself couldn't be all that bad. It allows each person to hit their spots and for Undertaker to not shoulder the majority of the burden.
Also, Strowman getting a semi-main event match is unforgivable. Vince has seen him "wrestle", right?
|
|
The Dave
Main Eventer
Con-Chair-Tos all around!
Joined on: Feb 2, 2008 15:29:11 GMT -5
Posts: 3,480
|
Post by The Dave on Jan 30, 2016 11:31:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by TheNinthCloud on Jan 30, 2016 11:40:02 GMT -5
If this is legitimate, I have absolutely no idea how they plan on saving Wrestlemania. Reigns/Triple H Wyatt/Lesnar Taker/Strowman Absolutely insane. That's barely enough to sell out a normal arena, let alone a stadium. Not even Summerslam worthy imo
|
|
|
Post by Yambag Jones on Jan 30, 2016 11:45:07 GMT -5
If this is legitimate, I have absolutely no idea how they plan on saving Wrestlemania. Reigns/Triple H Wyatt/Lesnar Taker/Strowman Absolutely insane. That's barely enough to sell out a normal arena, let alone a stadium. Not even Summerslam worthy imo Maybe they could get away with the first two, but Undertaker vs Strowman (as he's been pushed thus far) isn't really worthy of any PPV/Event.
|
|
|
Post by mikey1974 on Jan 30, 2016 13:37:27 GMT -5
This may be the first Mania I don't watch live since 23.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 27, 2024 15:15:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2016 15:56:10 GMT -5
PLEASE. PLEASE, NO.
This is shaping up to be one of the worst WMs ever. Literally all we need now is for AJ to be stuck in a random 6 man tag for the cycle of crap to be complete.
|
|
|
Post by dannybosa on Jan 30, 2016 16:00:16 GMT -5
Wrestlemania 32 is done for. Remember when Stephanie said "imagine a wrestlemania without John Cena", this is that wrestlemania, and it's scary.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 27, 2024 15:15:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2016 17:00:12 GMT -5
I'm not believing that. It's the biggest WrestleMania ever. They're trying to sell out and what not, they're not stupid enough to put Taker in that situation in his home state. that match.
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Jan 30, 2016 20:02:13 GMT -5
This may very well be the first WM in probably 10 years that i dont watch live. Every rumored match so far just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. With the main event heading towards HHH/Reigns, Thats just the icing on the nasty ass cake. This WM card is going to be basically a glorified Raw where they just pick names out of a hat and throw the 2 names they pick in a random match with no backstory.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Jan 30, 2016 20:14:11 GMT -5
I'm gonna watch Mania live because of the WWE Network. It's there, it's paid for and it's Mania.
However, the rumored card sounds mostly uninteresting. Similar to WrestleMania 29, which is the only one I purposely didn't order. I'm sorry but, HHH/Brock and the AWFUL Rock/Cena sequel sounded terrible. That's why I like having the Network. If I watch a show that turns out bad, I don't really regret it.
|
|
johnnyaustin21
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 21, 2011 14:16:20 GMT -5
Posts: 1,609
|
Post by johnnyaustin21 on Jan 30, 2016 20:29:49 GMT -5
I'm gonna watch Mania live because of the WWE Network. It's there, it's paid for and it's Mania. However, the rumored card sounds mostly uninteresting. Similar to WrestleMania 29, which is the only one I purposely didn't order. I'm sorry but, HHH/Brock and the AWFUL Rock/Cena sequel sounded terrible. That's why I like having the Network. If I watch a show that turns out bad, I don't really regret it. Ya Wrestlemania 29 was let down and the top three matches in Rock/Cena II,HHH/Brock and Taker/Punk weren't that interesting at all for me sense both of the top matches had already happen in a span of the same year and Taker/Punk had such a horse crap build up to their bout.But I would hands down take all three of those matches over the rumored trio where getting this year in HHH/Reigns,Brock/Wyatt and Taker/Strowman.
|
|
The Hitman
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 24, 2006 17:12:19 GMT -5
Posts: 2,377
|
Post by The Hitman on Jan 30, 2016 21:46:10 GMT -5
Such garbage.
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Jan 31, 2016 0:59:00 GMT -5
What a complete waste of a Wrestlemania match for Taker. As of right now, there isn't one rumored match on this card that's Wrestlemania-worthy. None of it interests me to be honest.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Jan 31, 2016 3:05:38 GMT -5
If this is the plan then I am genuinely baffled as to what they are thinking, in every logical aspect possible. Strowman vs Lesnar Would have made more sense if anything, but even still.
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jan 31, 2016 5:37:31 GMT -5
This is HORRID news so I really hope this is false.
Taker should not be wasting his precious last WM matches on someone like Braun...............
|
|
|
Post by ricflair4ever on Jan 31, 2016 9:27:13 GMT -5
The only way i see to go here is having Lesnar continuously beat down by the Wyatt Family leading towards Mania. Have Kane continuously beat down heading towards Mania. Then Taker could try to save Kane ,leading to him getting beat down by the Wyatts as well. All culminating in a 4 on 3 handicap match with the Wyatts vs Taker, Lesnar and Kane. With the buildup featuring tension between Lenar and Taker due to their history. Its a good way to cap off the Taker/Lesnar story with their joining forces against a common enemy, gives The Wyatts a small rub for being percieved as so dangerous that Taker and Lesnar would have to join up, gives Kane a match for Mania, and keeps some of the workload off of Taker. Not a perfect match, but much better than Taker vs Strowman and probably the best case scenario for all involved considering the depleteted roster.
|
|
|
Post by WWFAttitudeEraFan on Jan 31, 2016 22:23:22 GMT -5
Nothing will top this! You win! LMAO!
|
|