|
Post by #DI-WHY? on Apr 1, 2016 11:51:55 GMT -5
|
|
spookytuesday
Superstar
Joined on: Jan 10, 2010 20:14:06 GMT -5
Posts: 848
|
Post by spookytuesday on Apr 1, 2016 11:59:41 GMT -5
If that's true, I get the feeling it means Taker is losing and might actually be done.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 3, 2024 15:45:05 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2016 12:05:45 GMT -5
Like I said in a thread last night.
|
|
Quazimoto
Superstar
Joined on: Feb 4, 2014 12:37:37 GMT -5
Posts: 991
|
Post by Quazimoto on Apr 1, 2016 12:19:18 GMT -5
Pretty obvious move actually. The last thing WWE wants as the closing shot of WrestleMania is the majority of the stadium booing the hell out of their chosen one. So, it was either Ambrose/Lesnar or HIAC that closes the show. Given that HIAC has implications with control of RAW, which is basically control of WWE (because even WWE pretty much admits SmackDown doesn't matter - though, FYI, I generally like the show), it just makes sense to have Shane/Taker on last.
|
|
|
Post by cmiller79 on Apr 1, 2016 12:22:01 GMT -5
This match is bigger then the title
Good call wwe
I wonder how hard hhh fought for his match to go on last
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Apr 1, 2016 12:25:41 GMT -5
They don't want the show closing with Roman Reigns getting boo'd. I bet the WWE title match is probably going to be 3rd to last. They'll use that crappy Total Divas team match as a buffer to settle everyone down.
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Apr 1, 2016 12:25:52 GMT -5
APRIL FOOLS.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Apr 1, 2016 12:26:49 GMT -5
They don't want the show closing with Roman Reigns getting boo'd. I bet the WWE title match is probably going to be 3rd to last. They'll ise that crappy Total Divas team match as a buffer to settle everyone down. Total Divas tag is on the pre-show. They could put the battle royal as the buffer though. Also, this might mean Undertaker is actually losing.
|
|
|
Post by #DI-WHY? on Apr 1, 2016 12:28:39 GMT -5
They don't want the show closing with Roman Reigns getting boo'd. I bet the WWE title match is probably going to be 3rd to last. They'll ise that crappy Total Divas team match as a buffer to settle everyone down. Total Divas tag is on the pre-show. They could put the battle royal as the buffer though. Also, this might mean Undertaker is actually losing. I think it's very suspicious that this match is so high profile, they want Cena vs Taker for next year's Mania, and Cena may be cleared for a bit of physical action.
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Apr 1, 2016 12:28:39 GMT -5
They don't want the show closing with Roman Reigns getting boo'd. I bet the WWE title match is probably going to be 3rd to last. They'll ise that crappy Total Divas team match as a buffer to settle everyone down. Total Divas tag is on the pre-show. They could put the battle royal as the buffer though. Also, this might mean Undertaker is actually losing. Isn't the battle royal on the pre-show, too?
|
|
|
Post by #DI-WHY? on Apr 1, 2016 12:29:46 GMT -5
Total Divas tag is on the pre-show. They could put the battle royal as the buffer though. Also, this might mean Undertaker is actually losing. Isn't the battle royal on the pre-show, too? It got bumped up and the US title match got bumped down
|
|
jeffro2000
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 16, 2011 14:23:29 GMT -5
Posts: 1,858
|
Post by jeffro2000 on Apr 1, 2016 12:29:51 GMT -5
I don't know if it will definitely go last or not, but it is the only match I have even a little interest in seeing.
From a Kayfabe standpoint, it doesn't make any since why they are fighting or that it should be competitive, but I am intrigued.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Apr 1, 2016 12:35:57 GMT -5
Total Divas tag is on the pre-show. They could put the battle royal as the buffer though. Also, this might mean Undertaker is actually losing. Isn't the battle royal on the pre-show, too? As of Monday, there were four pre-show matches. The other day, they moved the battle royal back to the main card.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 3, 2024 15:45:05 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2016 12:52:07 GMT -5
If this isn't because it sets up Taker vs. Sting next year then this is a mistake.
|
|
|
Post by bababooey on Apr 1, 2016 12:59:23 GMT -5
One thing I don't understand about the stip of Taker being done if he loses. If Taker loses, Vince isn't in control. Therefore, Vince has no say in whether or not Taker is done.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 3, 2024 15:45:05 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2016 13:13:50 GMT -5
WWE I applaud you.
|
|
|
Post by Sizzle on Apr 1, 2016 13:27:26 GMT -5
That's good, but I don't want Shane winning.
|
|
AJ F'n Brooks
Main Eventer
Thank You AJ Lee!
Joined on: Jan 1, 2013 8:57:26 GMT -5
Posts: 1,288
|
Post by AJ F'n Brooks on Apr 1, 2016 13:37:38 GMT -5
Bryan Alvarez is the same guy who said that one of the Tough Enough contestants was going to be in the Royal Rumble match. If I were you I wouldn't take him that seriously... Honestly I find this "rumor" to be really hard to believe. I'm like 99,9% sure Triple H vs Roman Reigns is the main event. I mean what's the match the WWE is advertising more? It's everywhere. Roman Reigns vs Triple H closed the Raw go-home show, Renee Young referred to it as "the main event" last night on Smackdown and it's the match that is taking center stage in the poster they're selling at WrestleMania Axxess:
|
|
|
Post by A-Rob on Apr 1, 2016 13:44:15 GMT -5
That doesn't shock me.
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Apr 1, 2016 13:51:06 GMT -5
Seems like Undertakers hanging them up, think about it, ending Wrestlemania with Reigns being booed to hell or ending Wrestlemania with Undertaker getting a standing ovation
|
|