TheBadGuyChico
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: Dec 3, 2012 10:34:41 GMT -5
Posts: 1,715
|
Post by TheBadGuyChico on Apr 5, 2016 19:18:45 GMT -5
If we ever got a Bundy rerelease, would this work? The double strapped E10 Big Show chest, so his singlet is totally molded.
|
|
|
|
Post by ZDB on Apr 5, 2016 19:21:48 GMT -5
Way too thin, and probably too tall
|
|
TheBadGuyChico
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: Dec 3, 2012 10:34:41 GMT -5
Posts: 1,715
|
Post by TheBadGuyChico on Apr 5, 2016 19:26:33 GMT -5
Big Show really too think for Bundy? If anything big show has a wider chest and a similar gut. I'm curious if the torso length would be an issue now though.
|
|
hoganvspiper
Superstar
Joined on: Jun 9, 2013 21:10:25 GMT -5
Posts: 822 
|
Post by hoganvspiper on Apr 5, 2016 19:28:16 GMT -5
I would personally love to see a new Bundy with molded singlet. The Bundy Legends figure is among my least favorite. The new Big John Studd is excellent! Would like a good Bundy to go with him.
|
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Apr 5, 2016 19:48:37 GMT -5
Ab joints along with moulded singlet's are not a good mix. Cloth is the better option.
|
|
tommyb
Superstar
Joined on: Sept 19, 2013 19:45:42 GMT -5
Posts: 535
|
Post by tommyb on Apr 5, 2016 20:09:50 GMT -5
How about no more re-releases prior to getting figures that were not once available when people should have bought....and were as low priced as 14.99 on rsc moc with white box....
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 28, 2024 8:16:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2016 20:12:57 GMT -5
He NEEDS a new Molded singlet torso.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 28, 2024 8:16:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2016 20:15:33 GMT -5
How about no more re-releases prior to getting figures that were not once available when people should have bought....and were as low priced as 14.99 on rsc moc with white box.... Another person who doesn't grasp the idea of why rereleases are good. UGH. Some people were not collecting then, comprende? |
|
tommyb
Superstar
Joined on: Sept 19, 2013 19:45:42 GMT -5
Posts: 535
|
Post by tommyb on Apr 5, 2016 20:49:05 GMT -5
How about no more re-releases prior to getting figures that were not once available when people should have bought....and were as low priced as 14.99 on rsc moc with white box.... Another person who doesn't grasp the idea of why rereleases are good. UGH. Some people were not collecting then, comprende? Here is a comprehension for you, they can buy them on a secondary market then. These same people that want re-release are not the ones that always miss out yet the ones to lazy to buy them when they come out. I was 14 months late to the Mattel game but guess what that's what makes collecting great and finding the items you don't have or want, not walking into a store and getting a re-release when it could be like a One Man Gang per say that someone does not have |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 28, 2024 8:16:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2016 20:51:09 GMT -5
Another person who doesn't grasp the idea of why rereleases are good. UGH. Some people were not collecting then, comprende? Here is a comprehension for you, they can buy them on a secondary market them. These same people that want re-release are not the ones that always miss out yet the ones to lazy to buy them when they come out. I was 14 months late to the Mattel game but guess what that's what makes collecting great and finding the items you don't have or want, not walking into a store and getting a re-release when it could be like a One Man Gang per say that someone does not have Oh please. Do you have ANY idea how RIDICULOUS you sound. Oh these people are too lazy to buy them blah blah blah. Put a sock in it. Rereleasing figures is a logical decision. |
|
tommyb
Superstar
Joined on: Sept 19, 2013 19:45:42 GMT -5
Posts: 535
|
Post by tommyb on Apr 5, 2016 21:01:56 GMT -5
Yeah it's as logical as you complaining when others don't want figures redone so new ones can be made, your not worth my time you simply don't understand the big picture. Under your theory the government should print more money to get out of debt
|
|
|
|
Post by BoJack Hogan on Apr 5, 2016 23:00:12 GMT -5
If anything, Earthquake. The legend Bundy is horrendous from top to bottom. AS for the question? Too tall and narrow. Not even close. Wrong singlet type as well. That might be the only way they could release a worse Bundy than they already did.
|
|
TheBadGuyChico
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: Dec 3, 2012 10:34:41 GMT -5
Posts: 1,715
|
Post by TheBadGuyChico on Apr 5, 2016 23:26:39 GMT -5
If anything, Earthquake. The legend Bundy is horrendous from top to bottom. AS for the question? Too tall and narrow. Not even close. Wrong singlet type as well. That might be the only way they could release a worse Bundy than they already did. Singlet too looks close enough, no?   |
|
|
|
Post by Al_Snow_MotherF***ers on Apr 6, 2016 0:07:27 GMT -5
If anything, Earthquake. The legend Bundy is horrendous from top to bottom. AS for the question? Too tall and narrow. Not even close. Wrong singlet type as well. That might be the only way they could release a worse Bundy than they already did. Singlet too looks close enough, no? That big show has a small torso |
|
|
|
Post by qdogg on Apr 6, 2016 0:56:34 GMT -5
I am fine with the Bundy we got.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 28, 2024 8:16:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2016 1:12:03 GMT -5
Yeah it's as logical as you complaining when others don't want figures redone so new ones can be made, your not worth my time you simply don't understand the big picture. Under your theory the government should print more money to get out of debt Rereleasing figures is logical from Mattel's perspective. Mattel has already designed the figures, they've already tooled them with the parts, they likely have some accessories they can reuse, and then Mattel can make money instead of secondary market people. At the end of the day it's all about making profit. Printing extra cash isn't even comparable. When Mattel remakes a toy, they can sell it like a brand new toy without having to put the man hours into designing it. When the government prints more money, all that does is devalue the money already out there. I think that's what you're thinking: "My figure is now worth less cash!" It is. But that's your problem, not Mattel's. And it's ONLY your problem if you want to resale your figures. When the government devalues currency, that is everyone's problem regardless of circumstance. |
|
tyco84
Superstar
Joined on: Oct 15, 2012 16:26:50 GMT -5
Posts: 823
|
Post by tyco84 on Apr 6, 2016 1:40:57 GMT -5
Elite King Kong Bundy actually shares the Elite 4 Big Show's (the one with the cloth singlet) torso. While it's a good idea in theory, and i was actually thinking about trying to switch Bundy using an elite Big Show torso, he wears a wrestling singlet, which goes way up his back and would look totally wrong on Bundy.   They've redone every Mattycollector.com exclusive so far except him and Miss Elizabeth so hopefully redo's arent too far behind. I too really hate his cloth singlet (and cloth imitating any wrestling tights) so i want a new one badly. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 28, 2024 8:16:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2016 6:29:50 GMT -5
Elite King Kong Bundy actually shares the Elite 4 Big Show's (the one with the cloth singlet) torso. While it's a good idea in theory, and i was actually thinking about trying to switch Bundy using an elite Big Show torso, he wears a wrestling singlet, which goes way up his back and would look totally wrong on Bundy. They've redone every Mattycollector.com exclusive so far except him and Miss Elizabeth so hopefully redo's arent too far behind. I too really hate his cloth singlet (and cloth imitating any wrestling tights) so i want a new one badly. No KK Bundy does not use the E4 Big show torso. He used the Legends Andre the giant torso. |
|
