|
|
Post by tg11 on Sept 26, 2016 8:55:26 GMT -5
If anything should WWE bring back Bragging Rights as a pay per view especially now that the Brand Split is now effective again? Personally speaking I would love to see Bragging Rights back and why? Because it puts up RAW superstars against Smackdown superstars you get to see RAW vs Smackdown and not to mention the Bragging Rights matches have always been good too
|
|
|
|
Post by The Natural Eddy Valintino on Sept 26, 2016 9:25:14 GMT -5
If the concept is done at Survivor Series, every once and a while, then yes, it would be cool to see. This year, no. Keep both brands far away from each other. Next year, it would be to see a 5 on 5 RAW vs Smackdowm Survivor Series match, ala 2005
|
|
👑🇵🇭⭐️
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
King Of The Ring 2007 - Team Undisputed
Joined on: Feb 4, 2013 13:46:47 GMT -5
Posts: 4,674
|
Post by 👑🇵🇭⭐️ on Sept 26, 2016 9:27:27 GMT -5
I’m all for this!! Like I said in the Survivor Series thread… I'm not going to Survivor Series 2016, but I would love to see the Bragging Rights theme return. Option 1 Team Raw: the Universal Champion, the United States Champion, and the Raw Tag Team Champions vs. Team Smackdown: the World Champion, the Intercontinental Champion, and the Smackdown Tag Team Champions Option 2 Team Universal: the Universal Champion and 3 of Raw's main eventers vs. Team World: the World Champion and 3 of Smackdown's main eventers Team Intercontinental: the Intercontinental Champion and 3 of Smackdown's mid-carders vs. Team United States: the United States Champion and 3 of Raw's mid-carders Team Raw Tag Teams: the Raw Tag Team Champions and 3 of Raw's tag teams vs. Team Smackdown Tag Teams: the Smackdown Tag Team Champions and 3 of Smackdown's tag teams. Team Raw: the Raw Women's Champion and 3 of Raw's women vs. Team Smackdown: the Smackdown Women's Champion and 3 of Smackdown's women With Bragging Rights as it's own PPV, I wouldn’t mind seeing 4 Champions vs. Champions matches and a few Raw vs. Smackdown undercard matches, like: Brock Lesnar vs. John Cena Seth Rollins vs. Dean Ambrose Dolph Ziggler vs. Rusev The Club vs. The Usos Bayley and Sasha Banks vs. Alexa Bliss and Carmella Braun Strowman vs. Baron Corbin |
|
|
|
Post by sitruC on Sept 26, 2016 9:28:14 GMT -5
Yea and have NXT involved one time
|
|
|
|
Post by The Natural Eddy Valintino on Sept 26, 2016 9:35:10 GMT -5
I’m all for this!! Like I said in the Survivor Series thread… I'm not going to Survivor Series 2016, but I would love to see the Bragging Rights theme return. Option 1 Team Raw: the Universal Champion, the United States Champion, and the Raw Tag Team Champions vs. Team Smackdown: the World Champion, the Intercontinental Champion, and the Smackdown Tag Team Champions Option 2 Team Universal: the Universal Champion and 3 of Raw's main eventers vs. Team World: the World Champion and 3 of Smackdown's main as eventers Team Intercontinental: the Intercontinental Champion and 3 of Smackdown's mid-carders vs. Team United States: the United States Champion and 3 of Raw's mid-carders Team Raw Tag Teams: the Raw Tag Team Champions and 3 of Raw's tag teams vs. Team Smackdown Tag Teams: the Smackdown Tag Team Champions and 3 of Smackdown's tag teams. Team Raw: the Raw Women's Champion and 3 of Raw's women vs. Team Smackdown: the Smackdown Women's Champion and 3 of Smackdown's women With Bragging Rights as it's own PPV, I wouldn’t mind seeing 4 Champions vs. Champions matches and a few Raw vs. Smackdown undercard matches, like: Brock Lesnar vs. John Cena Seth Rollins vs. Dean Ambrose Dolph Ziggler vs. Rusev The Club vs. The Usos Bayley and Sasha Banks vs. Alexa Bliss and Carmella Braun Strowman vs. Baron Corbin I like option A better. One Survivor Series match between both brands is enough. Option B was just too much interaction between both brands. |
|
|
|
Post by Rude Awakening on Sept 26, 2016 9:35:52 GMT -5
No, just have the match or matches at survivor series
|
|
|
|
Post by theMOESIAH on Sept 26, 2016 9:48:45 GMT -5
I'd rather see then use King of the Ring for that. They could do it one of two ways: either every match is an inter-brand match, or they have two separate tournaments and the winners from each brand wrestle each other in the finals.
|
|
|
|
Post by BulletV1 on Sept 26, 2016 10:05:19 GMT -5
 no, it was Survivor Series a month before Survivor Series. How that idea got approved I'll never know. |
|
|
|
Post by hbkjason on Sept 26, 2016 10:14:29 GMT -5
no, Bragging Rights was one of the most insulting concepts the WWE ever came up with. I ing hated it with a passion. No wrestlers cared what brand they were on for 50 weeks of the year, but then all of a sudden we are expected to believe that there is some kind of brand loyalty which is then dropped the night after the PPV? No thanks, count me out! I was honestly amazed that so many people bought into the Bragging Rights concept as they did. |
|
|
|
Post by tylerbreezee on Sept 26, 2016 10:25:55 GMT -5
Nah just give me Smackdown vs Raw 2 at Survivor Series with Team Shane vs Team Stephanie. You may not fully like it but these would realistically be the teams
Team Stephanie :
1. Jericho
2. Rusev
3. TJ Perkins
4. Sami Zayn
5. Cesaro
Team Shane :
1. Orton
2. Apollo
3. Ziggler
4. Miz
5. Baron Corbin
|
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Sept 26, 2016 10:29:08 GMT -5
No. Absolutely not.
The whole "brand warfare" thing is a tired concept that WWE has never been able to implement properly. It's a piss-poor excuse to make the authority figures the central point of the shows (like they aren't doing that enough already.) The matches never mean anything and there's nothing at stake.
The brand loyalty crap is one of the worst things WWE tried to tout with the first brand split, and now they're doing it again. I rolled my eyes at Mick Foley saying "we're a team trying to beat Smackdown." No. You're a collection of men and women fighting for championships. And if they think it's something else, they're in the wrong business.
|
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Sept 26, 2016 10:55:24 GMT -5
No I always hated that crap and stuff like that is why the orginal split started to flop.
|
|
|
|
Post by JC Motors on Sept 26, 2016 11:13:16 GMT -5
I think the days of having this are long gone
|
|
hbkowns
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 15, 2011 23:33:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,250
|
Post by hbkowns on Sept 26, 2016 11:23:42 GMT -5
Too early
|
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Sept 26, 2016 12:03:41 GMT -5
No. Keep the rosters away from eachother.
|
|
|
|
Post by adzy on Sept 26, 2016 13:16:40 GMT -5
I was thinking about this and had an idea, at SvS have team Raw vs Smackdown....with the surviving members earning a world title shot. Say 3 men survive and win for team Raw then there would be a fatal 4 way for the UT at the next PPV. It could lead to some interesting situations, as people would want to win the match but if there were less survivors then theoretically they'd have a better chance of winning the title. There hasn't really been many SvS matches that have had much on the line recently so this could change that.
|
|
|
|
Post by BSR on Sept 26, 2016 13:24:21 GMT -5
It's far to early for that.
|
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Sept 26, 2016 13:24:30 GMT -5
Bragging Rights was so stupid.
No matter what, the brand splits never made any fans believe that there was a war between Raw and Smackdown. The wrestling fan knew that the brand split happened cause there was too much talent and not enough hours of the week on TV to showcase them.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 29, 2024 6:36:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 26, 2016 13:40:34 GMT -5
No both those PPVs sucked
|
|
|
|
Post by Rude Awakening on Sept 26, 2016 13:56:26 GMT -5
The raw vs sd match in 2010 and cena vs Orton in I quit match in 2009 were great matches
|
|
