|
|
Post by AxelSmackdown on Feb 9, 2017 13:13:52 GMT -5
WM33 is coming up and is possibly Undertaker's last Mania/match. Kane may be finished soon as well.
When they finally do get into the HoF, would you guys rather them be inducted separately or both separately and as The Brothers of Destruction?
I mean separately or both separately AND as a tag team.
|
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Feb 9, 2017 13:16:46 GMT -5
they need to go in seperately. they both have careers that are way too big to not pack into individual entrees.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 14:28:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2017 13:17:44 GMT -5
Separately is all I would care about.
|
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Feb 9, 2017 13:21:55 GMT -5
They're really not showing much respect to Kane. It's the 20th anniversary of Kane, he wasn't in the Rumble for the first time in forever, it's kind of sad.
He should just have Taker retire him at Mania
They'll definitely be going in HOF separately though
|
|
|
|
Post by ahunter8056 on Feb 9, 2017 13:22:01 GMT -5
Definitely individually. They're both huge, iconic stars that are far, far better known for single careers rather than tag team careers. Individual inductions is the least they deserve.
|
|
|
|
Post by AxelSmackdown on Feb 9, 2017 13:23:55 GMT -5
Definitely individually. They're both huge, iconic stars that are far, far better known for single careers rather than tag team careers. Individual inductions is the least they deserve. I don't think you understood my question correctly. I wasn't meaning either separately or as a tag team, I was meaning either separately or both separately AND as a tag team. |
|
|
|
Post by ahunter8056 on Feb 9, 2017 13:26:16 GMT -5
Definitely individually. They're both huge, iconic stars that are far, far better known for single careers rather than tag team careers. Individual inductions is the least they deserve. I don't think you understood my question correctly. I wasn't meaning either separately or as a tag team, I was meaning either separately or both separately AND as a tag team. Why would they induct them separately and then again as a tag team? That doesn't make any sense. |
|
|
|
Post by AxelSmackdown on Feb 9, 2017 13:29:44 GMT -5
I don't think you understood my question correctly. I wasn't meaning either separately or as a tag team, I was meaning either separately or both separately AND as a tag team. Why would they induct them separately and then again as a tag team? That doesn't make any sense. They inducted Flair singly and then later as part of the Four Horsemen..so why not? |
|
|
|
Post by ahunter8056 on Feb 9, 2017 13:34:40 GMT -5
Why would they induct them separately and then again as a tag team? That doesn't make any sense. They inducted Flair singly and then later as part of the Four Horsemen..so why not? Only one of the four had been inducted. Flair was only a quarter of the team, so it was acceptable. The other three members of the team were far better known for being tag team stars together rather than singles stars, so it made sense to induct them together. |
|
|
|
Post by fzmadness on Feb 9, 2017 14:41:43 GMT -5
Separately. Taker deserves to go in alone. As does Kane to a lesser degree.
|
|
|
|
Post by Escape The Rules on Feb 9, 2017 15:36:21 GMT -5
They're really not showing much respect to Kane. It's the 20th anniversary of Kane, he wasn't in the Rumble for the first time in forever, it's kind of sad. He should just have Taker retire him at Mania They'll definitely be going in HOF separately though He's taking a bit of time off right now to deal with some nagging injuries. |
|
bigraj
Main Eventer
PSN: bigraj70501
Joined on: Nov 5, 2010 16:46:40 GMT -5
Posts: 1,779
|
Post by bigraj on Feb 9, 2017 17:18:17 GMT -5
I'd prefer 'Taker goes in like Andre. As the ONLY guy to go in that particular year. Kane could be the #2 guy in a different year.
|
|
HTMN
Superstar
Joined on: Oct 24, 2013 15:42:13 GMT -5
Posts: 849 
|
Post by HTMN on Feb 9, 2017 17:23:32 GMT -5
I'd prefer 'Taker goes in like Andre. As the ONLY guy to go in that particular year. Kane could be the #2 guy in a different year. I think Kane is big enough to headline the HOF one year. No matter what anyone says he more than deserves it. |
|
|
|
Post by wwextreme25 on Feb 11, 2017 4:54:27 GMT -5
I'd prefer 'Taker goes in like Andre. As the ONLY guy to go in that particular year. Kane could be the #2 guy in a different year. I think Kane is big enough to headline the HOF one year. No matter what anyone says he more than deserves it. I agree, even though this last couple of years have somewhat been a massive drag with his character. |
|
|
|
Post by JokerFC on Feb 11, 2017 7:09:07 GMT -5
Separate and that would do me fine. The BOD are not something I was all that into....They each deserve their own entries.
|
|
|
|
Post by McBlake on Feb 11, 2017 8:35:03 GMT -5
Brothers of Destruction would be pretty low on my list of tag teams that deserve HOF inductions.
|
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Feb 13, 2017 11:41:24 GMT -5
Why can't they do both? DX will most likely be inducted singly aswell as a team and once Hogan is on good terms we will see the nWo inducted.
|
|
hbkowns
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 15, 2011 23:33:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,253
|
Post by hbkowns on Feb 13, 2017 12:19:49 GMT -5
As a team no...
Separately they're both headliners of their respective classes IMO. It will be interesting how Undertaker accepts his induction. Really wonder if it's going to be in character or if Mark Calloway is going to speak.
|
|
Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD
Main Eventer
I need a monster condom for my magnum sized dong.
Joined on: Nov 25, 2011 16:25:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,713
|
Post by Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD on Feb 13, 2017 14:30:27 GMT -5
They're really not showing much respect to Kane. It's the 20th anniversary of Kane, he wasn't in the Rumble for the first time in forever, it's kind of sad. He should just have Taker retire him at Mania They'll definitely be going in HOF separately though He's been inactive for over 2 months. |
|
