hbkowns
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 15, 2011 23:33:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,249
|
Post by hbkowns on Feb 18, 2017 10:53:42 GMT -5
 But no, Cena vs Taker was sacrificed for Miz/Maryse vs Cena/Nikki and Reigns vs Taker. Ahh Mattel, thanks for adding more salt to the wound. The match we'll probably never get to see at this point. |
|
|
|
Post by ClashOfStyles on Feb 18, 2017 10:58:15 GMT -5
Ha! They're just teasing us now.
|
|
|
|
Post by sitruC on Feb 18, 2017 11:19:28 GMT -5
The match already happened at Vengeance
|
|
|
|
Post by ahunter8056 on Feb 18, 2017 12:13:41 GMT -5
I always find it hilarious when fans blindly believe dirtsheets as confirmation of what WWE has planned. It only happens when it happens. Even if dirtsheets actually knew what was going on, plans can still change at any time.
|
|
hbkowns
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 15, 2011 23:33:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,249
|
Post by hbkowns on Feb 18, 2017 12:57:39 GMT -5
I always find it hilarious when fans blindly believe dirtsheets as confirmation of what WWE has planned. It only happens when it happens. Even if dirtsheets actually knew what was going on, plans can still change at any time. But when was the last time they were dead wrong. Meltzer pointed out nearly a year out from WM31 that the plan was Reigns vs Lesnar. They have been wrong before, no doubt, but 8 or 9/10 times they're dead on. Of course plans can change, that's the means of the business. |
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Feb 18, 2017 13:07:29 GMT -5
OK we currently have 2 rematches at Mania so why do you want a third? Cena vs Taker has happened lots of times so I don't get why you want them to hog time on the Mania card.
The only time that match mattered was when the streak was alive.
|
|
|
|
Post by BROKEN on Feb 18, 2017 13:18:55 GMT -5
I like the miz and maryse vs nikki and john match.
|
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Feb 18, 2017 14:55:48 GMT -5
Wasn't there a report a week or so back that Taker was the one who requested a match with Reigns? Something about wanting to help build up a new star and Taker felt Cena was already too established.
If this is Taker's last match, and it should be, I'm sure WWE would give him whatever he asked for.
|
|
Thunder Chunky
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 1, 2010 21:57:30 GMT -5
Posts: 4,488
|
Post by Thunder Chunky on Feb 18, 2017 14:58:43 GMT -5
OK we currently have 2 rematches at Mania so why do you want a third? Cena vs Taker has happened lots of times so I don't get why you want them to hog time on the Mania card. The only time that match mattered was when the streak was alive. They've only wrestled 2 or 3 times, with one of those being a tag match. And another when Cena wasn't established as the "guy" yet. |
|
|
|
Post by Next Man’s Knowing Rock on Feb 18, 2017 18:35:59 GMT -5
I'm usually not a fan of these ring and two guys Mania time sets, but this one looks pretty great with the accessories. I wish this was the Mania match, but I'm looking forward to Undertaker vs Reigns.
|
|
hbkowns
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 15, 2011 23:33:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,249
|
Post by hbkowns on Feb 18, 2017 19:41:58 GMT -5
Wasn't there a report a week or so back that Taker was the one who requested a match with Reigns? Something about wanting to help build up a new star and Taker felt Cena was already too established. If this is Taker's last match, and it should be, I'm sure WWE would give him whatever he asked for. There's no point of putting Reigns over unless he turns heel. Putting Reigns over with the schmutz, squeaky clean, is adding more gas to the fire. |
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Feb 18, 2017 19:45:54 GMT -5
Wasn't there a report a week or so back that Taker was the one who requested a match with Reigns? Something about wanting to help build up a new star and Taker felt Cena was already too established. If this is Taker's last match, and it should be, I'm sure WWE would give him whatever he asked for. There's no point of putting Reigns over unless he turns heel. Putting Reigns over with the schmutz, squeaky clean, is adding more gas to the fire. I agree. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 23:10:37 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2017 20:04:24 GMT -5
Wasn't there a report a week or so back that Taker was the one who requested a match with Reigns? Something about wanting to help build up a new star and Taker felt Cena was already too established. If this is Taker's last match, and it should be, I'm sure WWE would give him whatever he asked for. There's no point of putting Reigns over unless he turns heel. Putting Reigns over with the schmutz, squeaky clean, is adding more gas to the fire. OMG I wish people would let this idea go. Roman is not turning heel it's obvious what is going to happen. Roman will beat Taker will then either kneel down or grab the mic to put him over. Because they think Taker showing him respect will finally make the fans like Roman. In fact it's so obvious Stevie Wonder could see it coming. |
|
hbkowns
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 15, 2011 23:33:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,249
|
Post by hbkowns on Feb 18, 2017 20:21:01 GMT -5
There's no point of putting Reigns over unless he turns heel. Putting Reigns over with the schmutz, squeaky clean, is adding more gas to the fire. OMG I wish people would let this idea go. Roman is not turning heel it's obvious what is going to happen. Roman will beat Taker will then either kneel down or grab the mic to put him over. Because they think Taker showing him respect will finally make the fans like Roman. In fact it's so obvious Stevie Wonder could see it coming. Why would people let it go when we all know it's bad... I really think this is going to lead to a heel turn. If not, they're going to be digging a bigger ditch for what's left of Reigns' career. How can Vince think that Reigns, who is arguably the most hated guy on the roster, going clean over the most beloved and respected wrestler of all time going to get him over with the audience? He can't be that stupid and oblivious. Maybe he knows, and just doesn't care, and is too stubborn to admit that his pet project was a complete failure. Reigns can still be salvaged though and can be a huge star, but not the way Vince & co. want it. Let him be heel and show his true personality and print money. He is meant for the top heel role. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 23:10:37 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2017 20:32:59 GMT -5
OMG I wish people would let this idea go. Roman is not turning heel it's obvious what is going to happen. Roman will beat Taker will then either kneel down or grab the mic to put him over. Because they think Taker showing him respect will finally make the fans like Roman. In fact it's so obvious Stevie Wonder could see it coming. Why would people let it go when we all know it's bad... I really think this is going to lead to a heel turn. If not, they're going to be digging a bigger ditch for what's left of Reigns' career. How can Vince think that Reigns, who is arguably the most hated guy on the roster, going clean over the most beloved and respected wrestler of all time going to get him over with the audience? He can't be that stupid and oblivious. Maybe he knows, and just doesn't care, and is too stubborn to admit that his pet project was a complete failure.
Reigns can still be salvaged though and can be a huge star, but not the way Vince & co. want it. Let him be heel and show his true personality and print money. He is meant for the top heel role. that's just it they don't care and won't care as long. as everyone is watching and giving them their money. |
|
|
|
Post by Controversial Maverick PUNK on Feb 18, 2017 20:50:28 GMT -5
OMG I wish people would let this idea go. Roman is not turning heel it's obvious what is going to happen. Roman will beat Taker will then either kneel down or grab the mic to put him over. Because they think Taker showing him respect will finally make the fans like Roman. In fact it's so obvious Stevie Wonder could see it coming. Why would people let it go when we all know it's bad... I really think this is going to lead to a heel turn. If not, they're going to be digging a bigger ditch for what's left of Reigns' career. How can Vince think that Reigns, who is arguably the most hated guy on the roster, going clean over the most beloved and respected wrestler of all time going to get him over with the audience? He can't be that stupid and oblivious. Maybe he knows, and just doesn't care, and is too stubborn to admit that his pet project was a complete failure. Reigns can still be salvaged though and can be a huge star, but not the way Vince & co. want it. Let him be heel and show his true personality and print money. He is meant for the top heel role. I have never understood all the clamour to turn Reigns heel. You do realise that in order to "print money" in the top heel role in the vein of names such as Michaels, HHH, Rock, Austin, Punk, Jericho, and more recently Owens and Styles - even Vince himself, and Steph, for that matter - you need top-notch mic skills and promo ability. Reigns has neither. IMO, he'd be even worse as a heel - unless you got him a mouthpiece, ala Heyman. |
|
|
|
Post by ZDB on Feb 18, 2017 22:25:53 GMT -5
If Reigns beats Taker I might turn the show off
Would only be worse if he had been the one to break the streak but beating Taker at WM should still be near impossible
|
|
/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/2884912/odbhit.0.gif)
