|
|
Post by blissfan4life on Oct 21, 2017 14:35:45 GMT -5
Does anyone else think there are too many PPVS? I mean its nuts having two just two weeks apart.
|
|
|
|
Post by tylerbreezee on Oct 21, 2017 15:29:57 GMT -5
They complain about budget issuses by they're doing two PPVs a month.. WWELogic
|
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Oct 21, 2017 16:09:43 GMT -5
I'm a firm believer of quality over quantity so I would be more than happy if there was a few months between PPV's.
At present Raw isn't going to have another single PPV until Febuary and that is perfect IMO.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 4, 2024 1:16:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2017 21:51:11 GMT -5
Just have 1 a month, You can build better Feuds if it's just 1 a month.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mox on Oct 21, 2017 22:03:42 GMT -5
Nope. I wish there were more. And frankly I think it's weird that you think there're too many.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rated [R] NinJa on Oct 21, 2017 22:19:24 GMT -5
Are there too many PPVs? Yes.
Do I mind? No. There’s about a month gap between the individual brand PPVs so they have about 4 weeks build (even though it’s not done properly) also, I’m glad I can watch 2 PPVs a month for £10 via the WWE Network as opposed to £15 for 1 PPV a month on Sky Box Office a few years ago.
|
|
robbutler01
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 10, 2013 15:10:27 GMT -5
Posts: 1,267
|
Post by robbutler01 on Oct 22, 2017 2:42:05 GMT -5
Yes there are and as a result nothing send special or leaves a lasting mark anymore.
I can remember the 80 and 90s when I was young perfectly and I can remember interviews word for word but I can barely remember what happens now 5 mins later and the impact of the events lasts less than that
It's a shame if you ask me
|
|
|
|
Post by The Brain on Oct 22, 2017 2:46:18 GMT -5
Absolutely. Having 2 PPV's in one month is ridiculous. It's overkill IMO.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 4, 2024 1:16:59 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2017 5:05:36 GMT -5
Such an odd complaint. More wrestling, the better to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by cableV on Oct 22, 2017 8:50:07 GMT -5
You can cut the number of PPVs all you want, it won't magically make the product better. All these PPVs could still mean something if the man in charge knew/wanted to book them to, but he doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Post by blissfan4life on Oct 22, 2017 12:57:06 GMT -5
Nope. I wish there were more. And frankly I think it's weird that you think there're too many. Wish you'd people stop telling me to stop having an opinion. IMO There is way too many. |
|
|
|
Post by @.@ Hempsterdance @.@ on Oct 22, 2017 13:00:45 GMT -5
Nope. I wish there were more. And frankly I think it's weird that you think there're too many. Wish you'd people stop telling me to stop having an opinion. IMO There is way too many.  |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 4, 2024 1:16:59 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2017 13:25:21 GMT -5
Yes there are too many povs and Vince McMahon doesn't care if we don't like it!
|
|
Thunder Chunky
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 1, 2010 21:57:30 GMT -5
Posts: 4,493
Member is Online
|
Post by Thunder Chunky on Oct 22, 2017 13:27:15 GMT -5
No. No one is forcing you to watch them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rated [R] NinJa on Oct 22, 2017 13:32:12 GMT -5
Yes there are too many povs and Vince McMahon doesn't care if we don't like it! There’s only one thing he cares about and I don’t blame him lol  |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 4, 2024 1:16:59 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2017 13:42:39 GMT -5
I honestly don't have an opinion about it. It could be 6 PPVs or 24 PPVs a year. I'd still be miserable watching them. If there wasn't a PPV Sunday, I'd just suffer through something else instead.
|
|
|
|
Post by Next Man’s Knowing Rock on Oct 22, 2017 19:51:01 GMT -5
You can cut the number of PPVs all you want, it won't magically make the product better. All these PPVs could still mean something if the man in charge knew/wanted to book them to, but he doesn't. Exactly. Each brand has one PPV a month. That's how often there was a PPV in the oh so treasured attitude era, and nobody (except maybe Jim Cornett and the like) complained that there were too many. There isn't really a solution at this point. They can't take stuff away from episodes of Raw and SmackDown episodes because the TV deals are so important. So PPVs seem less important when the TV shows have PPV level matches all the time. But at least the PPVs are a lot cheaper than they were... Hell, we're paying 9.99 a month and getting both a Raw and a SmackDown event for that most months. |
|
|
|
Post by The Natural Eddy Valintino on Oct 22, 2017 21:54:20 GMT -5
Nope. I wish there were more. And frankly I think it's weird that you think there're too many. Wish you'd people stop telling me to stop having an opinion. IMO There is way too many. So you're allowed to have an opinion on too many PPVs, but when some people had an opinion on Alexa Bliss being a horrible champion, you were the first one to call people out for their opinion being wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by Emerald Enthusiast on Oct 23, 2017 0:35:48 GMT -5
Yes, that's been one of WWE's problems for decades. When there were about 6 PPVs, there was plenty of time to build big matches and produce well-written TV shows. Now matches rarely feel special because the shows and the glut of PPVs all blend together.
|
|
|
|
Post by Escape The Rules on Oct 23, 2017 9:15:58 GMT -5
Not at all. I look forward to them. If this was pre 2016 brand split where almost every show felt the same during that awkward, no mans land era from 2014 to 2016 then I'd say yes, but ever since the Draft, I've enjoyed the PPVs thoroughly.
|
|
![Rated [R] NinJa Avatar](http://storage.proboards.com/530008/avatar/IDIYNeRTVZulhCPXFiqx.png)
