|
|
Post by dufflebagboi on Nov 12, 2007 22:04:24 GMT -5
Im thinking about getting a new 7 megapixal digital cam for 140 bucks do you guys think it is worth it? and how crisp do the pics come out for
a 7 megapixal?
|
|
|
|
Post by compton on Nov 13, 2007 2:14:25 GMT -5
I saw this camera on Attack of the Show: The HP Photosmart R847 Digital Camera  8 Megapixels3x optical zoomIntuitive user interface with a large menu pad
Quick power on and picture taking comparable to more expensive cameras
Satisfying navigation of pictures and videos
HP Steady Photo
Adaptive Lighting
Burst shot for sequential images
Records video
Photoshop in your camera with touchup, filters, borders
Remove red eyes from humans and pets
Lots of lens distortion
Zooming-in compresses image
Wide angle pictures look like a fish-eye lens
Higher ISO speed (ISO 400 or above), meaning shorter exposure, has way too much noise
Noise permeates pictures even at ISO 100
Great for casual pictures with friends
Stylish to bring anywhere
Terrible for any sort of amateur photography
May be able to find a camera with better image quality for the same price on the internet
About $200 |
|
|
|
Post by kanekilledvince on Nov 13, 2007 14:28:10 GMT -5
My camera is 7.1 MP. You can view my pictures on the loose site (in my sig). Any post made by "Shane Maguire" will have my pictures, so that should give you some idea  |
|
|
|
Post by youngniles on Nov 13, 2007 14:47:16 GMT -5
Yeah It's worth it. 7 MP pictures come out pretty cripsp anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by vpw2 on Nov 13, 2007 14:52:08 GMT -5
Megapixels don't really have too much to do with the image quality anyway, it's just an indication of how large you can blow the images up without affecting quality. For 140 bucks, it's probably not the best camera.
|
|
|
|
Post by kanekilledvince on Nov 13, 2007 15:10:33 GMT -5
Megapixels don't really have too much to do with the image quality anyway, it's just an indication of how large you can blow the images up without affecting quality. For 140 bucks, it's probably not the best camera. This guy is right. Don't bother with a high MP camera if you don't plan on making pictures bigger. It may overall be a disappointing camera, as some are just not great at taking close or detailed pictures. But I'm not a camera expert. 140 just sounds a little too inexpensive for a 7mp, so i imagine it lacks in areas. My camera cost me 300 Euro (approx. 440 US $). I think its a quality camera though. Kodak easyshare Z710:  |
|
|
|
Post by No Brokeback on Nov 13, 2007 17:33:55 GMT -5
Like said above. Megapixles have nothing to do with how 'good' the pictures turn out. It just means pretty much that you can make larger prints. Camera brag time Very pricey, but I recommend saving up..my shots look like-   |
|
