|
|
Post by uzerx on Feb 4, 2008 20:07:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Tim Tebow™ on Feb 4, 2008 20:33:52 GMT -5
4 or 2. Both look good.
|
|
|
|
Post by mattoriginal on Feb 4, 2008 20:35:07 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 6, 2024 20:17:55 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2008 20:35:35 GMT -5
I like 4..
|
|
|
|
Post by uzerx on Feb 4, 2008 20:55:18 GMT -5
Dude, get a life.
|
|
|
|
Post by ruthlessagression on Feb 4, 2008 20:56:30 GMT -5
3 would look great without the red barb wire imo. So I say 4.
|
|
|
|
Post by Focalin on Feb 4, 2008 21:05:59 GMT -5
I really like number 1. But I also like number 4. So I vote;
number 1 on the front, and the simple barbed wire on the back.
|
|
|
|
Post by uzerx on Feb 4, 2008 21:14:21 GMT -5
The numbers for the pics are at the bottom of the pictures, just saying.
|
|
|
|
Post by hurricane on Feb 4, 2008 23:14:49 GMT -5
#3 no doubt
|
|
Phoenix Nitro
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Jul 26, 2010 16:49:39 GMT -5
Posts: 404
|
Post by Phoenix Nitro on Feb 5, 2008 1:45:35 GMT -5
I'm actually gonna be the first to vote '5'. It's simple, and one color, so it stands out. And that's really all you need for a design like that.
Number 1 looks too plain, IMO.
2 looks like it's trying too hard. Reminds me of the Saw movies.
3 is just a bad shade for the design, wouldn't be noticed by moving eyes at all.
4 is like 5, except it's just TOO out-there. Maybe it would look better if I saw it printed on the shirt.
I'm definetly gonna go with 5.
Suggestion; make the stitching of the shirt white or red.
|
|
|
|
Post by Groundswell on Feb 5, 2008 3:25:43 GMT -5
#3 looks badass
|
|
mike massacre
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: Mar 28, 2005 15:53:41 GMT -5
Posts: 4,058
|
Post by mike massacre on Feb 5, 2008 7:57:28 GMT -5
4 and 5 are pretty sick.
|
|
|
|
Post by B®ÄУȟ ÏÄÑ on Feb 5, 2008 9:38:39 GMT -5
I like 4 and 3.
|
|
