|
|
Post by @PaulGriffin on Dec 7, 2007 0:59:44 GMT -5
Well I was talking to my good buddy and fellow host of Rocketbusta Radio and I mentioned how I was excited to see Evolution on Monday, seeing as im a total mark for any motorhead song not titled "The Game" and he points out that this is more than likely setting up what nobody wants to see. William Washington (10:29:49 PM): You know why I'm sad about this Evolution reunion? DJ Paul Grizzle (10:30:03 PM): it doesnt work? William Washington (10:30:15 PM): No, it works just fine. It actually makes a ton of sense. William Washington" (10:30:29 PM): The problem is that it's likely going to plant the seeds for everything the Observer mentioned. William Washington (10:30:40 PM): About Orton vs. HHH at the Rumble. William Washington (10:31:19 PM): HHH, Batista, and Flair are all fine with each other and have been for a while now. William Washington (10:31:33 PM): And Orton... well, Orton's probably going to be the guy who ruins it. William Washington (10:31:46 PM): Since he has the biggest axe to grind with the group. William Washington (10:32:00 PM): And he's probably going to be facing HHH at the Rumble. DJ Paul Grizzle (10:32:01 PM): ugh DJ Paul Grizzle (10:32:10 PM): So much for that Jeff Hardy push William Washington (10:32:28 PM): Which is exactly what I said to Michael Z. William Washington" (10:33:06 PM): When we were talking about it, I said that I wouldn't put it past Hunter to pull the plug on it and make him look worse than he did before entering the program with HHH. William Washington (10:35:03 PM): Hooray! Surprise surprise. Everyone thought that Triple H was really pushing for Hardy only to be a douche to Chris Jericho, but in the long run, that doesnt matter right? Well guess what. It aint happening. Jeff Hardy will job out to Triple H at Armageddon, Triple H will move on to bury Orton, and BATISTA, boring no talent Batista will win the Rumble. Thus leading to a feud that has already been wrapped up WITH A HELL IN A CELL. I <3 Triple H :-| |
|
|
|
Post by chumped on Dec 7, 2007 1:03:37 GMT -5
If this is actually what will go down, as far as Orton/Hunter goes, I'm happy. That will give Orton a good title run, having it from Mercy to Rumble. HHH vs Orton at RR will be awesome too. But, Batista vs HHH.....  |
|
|
|
Post by @PaulGriffin on Dec 7, 2007 1:08:04 GMT -5
Title runs that end with Triple H walking out with the belt are NOT good title runs. Orton's title run has been fairly lackluster anyway. He wasnt even booked like a champion for the first month of it. Now it's too late since Triple H is going to hijack the show again like he did with the Benoit title run.
|
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Dec 7, 2007 3:12:22 GMT -5
Hardy sucks anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by @PaulGriffin on Dec 7, 2007 3:13:22 GMT -5
Yeah if this was 2003/2004 |
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Dec 7, 2007 3:14:54 GMT -5
Funny one.
|
|
|
|
Post by dalethegreat on Dec 7, 2007 5:08:06 GMT -5
rather HHH with the title than anyone mentioned so thats okay with me
|
|
|
|
Post by @PaulGriffin on Dec 7, 2007 5:09:21 GMT -5
rather HHH with the title than anyone mentioned so thats okay with me You have got to be kidding. |
|
|
|
Post by dancinfatass on Dec 7, 2007 5:34:13 GMT -5
I'd rather see someone else win the Rumble. It'll be the same crap as before with Badtista winning the Rumble. "I want my title shot with HHH ... lol j/k... Thumbs Down ..... Spine Buster .... lol i fool u"
|
|
Master Lewpac
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Detroit plays dirty.
Joined on: Apr 12, 2007 1:47:12 GMT -5
Posts: 1,890
|
Post by Master Lewpac on Dec 7, 2007 5:37:30 GMT -5
I'd rather see someone else win the Rumble. It'll be the same **** as before with Badtista winning the Rumble. "I want my title shot with HHH ... lol j/k... Thumbs Down ..... Spine Buster .... lol i fool u" Exactly what I was thinking. Unless HHH goes to Smackdown before the Rumble for some reason. Which I dont see happening. |
|
Fury
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 21, 2007 21:19:09 GMT -5
Posts: 4,257
|
Post by Fury on Dec 7, 2007 5:39:12 GMT -5
Triple H is the only person who's actually ready to take the title off of Orton, which needs to be done ASAP, so I hope he does win the title. As for Batista, I doubt he'll face Triple H at mania, I still think Trips may indeed end up facing either HBK or Kennedy (if they want to push him that far).
|
|
|
|
Post by @PaulGriffin on Dec 7, 2007 6:03:14 GMT -5
Putting the belt back on Triple H, who never puts anyone over, is counter-productive and does nothing but hurt the business.
If anything, building Jeff Hardy to the Rumble win and him taking the belt from Orton would be perfect. Hardy is the most over guy on RAW and putting the title on him, even for just a month would be absolutely fine.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 6, 2024 23:47:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2007 6:33:45 GMT -5
Putting the belt back on Triple H, who never puts anyone over, is counter-productive and does nothing but hurt the business. If anything, building Jeff Hardy to the Rumble win and him taking the belt from Orton would be perfect. Hardy is the most over guy on RAW and putting the title on him, even for just a month would be absolutely fine. If you wanted to destroy the credibility of the WWE title even more, then yes, it would be absolutely fine. |
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Dec 7, 2007 7:46:04 GMT -5
Nothing i didnt expect to be honest. HHH is the sort of person that until the day he retires, he will continue to be in the spotlight and having others job to him.
|
|
Cmaster05
Main Eventer
My warning level is stuck. And I like it.
Joined on: Jul 3, 2007 14:54:54 GMT -5
Posts: 1,096
|
Post by Cmaster05 on Dec 7, 2007 7:54:50 GMT -5
WOW! This is supposed to go into the spoiler's section, genious.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 6, 2024 23:47:29 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2007 9:35:45 GMT -5
Putting the belt back on Triple H, who never puts anyone over, is counter-productive and does nothing but hurt the business. If anything, building Jeff Hardy to the Rumble win and him taking the belt from Orton would be perfect. Hardy is the most over guy on RAW and putting the title on him, even for just a month would be absolutely fine. If you wanted to destroy the credibility of the WWE title even more, then yes, it would be absolutely fine. Since when did the belt or the guys that held it, have cred? |
|
|
|
Post by Mr.GT on Dec 7, 2007 9:38:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by vertan on Dec 7, 2007 10:40:55 GMT -5
We all know HHH will take the gold....but I'd rather he do it at Wrestlemania.
I'd rather have Jeff Hardy VS. Orton at the Rumble. At least Hardy would look more credible in a title match.
HHH can then win the Rumble and win it at 'Mania. How many times now have they scrapped Orton VS. HHH?!
- Vertan
|
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Dec 7, 2007 12:18:53 GMT -5
yeah, but he's over, and he's what the fans want. |
|
|
|
Post by @PaulGriffin on Dec 7, 2007 12:55:05 GMT -5
We all know HHH will take the gold....but I'd rather he do it at Wrestlemania. I'd rather have Jeff Hardy VS. Orton at the Rumble. At least Hardy would look more credible in a title match. HHH can then win the Rumble and win it at 'Mania. How many times now have they scrapped Orton VS. HHH?! - Vertan That's even more ridiculous. Triple H doesnt need anymore Mania Main events or Rumble wins. It's super counter productive. We've already seen Triple H vs Batista and it WAS NOT GOOD...multiple times! The whole editing someone's previous post isnt funny anymore chief. And I dont know what you guys have been watching, but this whole "Hardy Sucks" stuff has got to be the most ridiculous thing i've heard. It's almost like everyone here doesnt watch RAW and see that Jeff has been at his best for the past year and a half. He has what it takes to be a star, it's only a matter of pushing him right. Jobbing him out to Triple H is not the right way to do it. |
|
