|
|
Post by cccmrkennedy on Aug 29, 2007 20:35:27 GMT -5
Do you think if Owen Hart had not died, that the Over the Edge PPV name would still be around today ? Cause it was scrapped pretty much because of that.
Every other PPV name, bar St. Valentine's Day Massacre, that year stayed around.
So do you think it would have ?
|
|
|
|
Post by TeamExtreme718x on Aug 29, 2007 20:36:25 GMT -5
Umm I dont know.. I doubt it though.. Wasnt there also a DX ppv?
|
|
|
|
Post by taker1 on Aug 29, 2007 20:38:33 GMT -5
Fully Loaded?
|
|
|
|
Post by cccmrkennedy on Aug 29, 2007 20:39:06 GMT -5
Umm I dont know.. I doubt it though.. Wasnt there also a DX ppv? 1997  |
|
|
|
Post by cccmrkennedy on Aug 29, 2007 20:39:55 GMT -5
I meant there was at least another one after 1999. If you know what I'm saying. Sorry for not making that clear. |
|
|
|
Post by Iron Man on Aug 29, 2007 21:00:33 GMT -5
Does it Matter. It's just a PPV Name.
|
|
|
|
Post by pg14 on Aug 29, 2007 21:06:24 GMT -5
he prolly would be in TNA today
|
|
|
|
Post by cutthroat on Aug 29, 2007 21:11:02 GMT -5
Just like they had a PPV for the Rock when he was part of the corporation it was Rock Bottom
|
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Aug 29, 2007 21:12:55 GMT -5
A similar question: Were it not for 9/11, would Raw still be known as Raw is War?
|
|
|
|
Post by Chicago on Aug 29, 2007 23:11:05 GMT -5
Yes to the OTE question.
No to the RIW question.
Both names likely wouldn't have lasted much longer anyway. Regarding the ppv's, only a few like Backlash and Unforgiven lasted anyways as the picks of the litter of ppv names.
|
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Aug 29, 2007 23:22:45 GMT -5
Anyone else kinda miss the little "sub" titles for PPVs? (I can't remember the actual word)...It was things like "In Your House: Good Friends, Better Enemies"...and "In Your House: Breakdown"
I assume it was purely to differentiate IYH 2 from IYH 30, but it added a little something
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 28, 2024 22:43:08 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2007 23:32:43 GMT -5
A similar question: Were it not for 9/11, would Raw still be known as Raw is War? Didn't the "War" rep the WCW/WWF thing, and when it ended and WWF won, they got rid of the "War" cause the "war" was over? |
|
|
|
Post by Sound888 on Aug 29, 2007 23:34:02 GMT -5
A similar question: Were it not for 9/11, would Raw still be known as Raw is War? Didn't the "War" rep the WCW/WWF thing, and when it ended and WWF won, they got rid of the "War" cause the "war" was over? No, it was always Raw is War/War Zone. |
|
|
|
Post by Edgeman05 on Aug 29, 2007 23:41:34 GMT -5
I think the PPV would not be around today.
|
|
|
|
Post by cccmrkennedy on Aug 30, 2007 6:11:35 GMT -5
Didn't the "War" rep the WCW/WWF thing, and when it ended and WWF won, they got rid of the "War" cause the "war" was over? No, it was always Raw is War/War Zone. Yeah, RAW is WAR stopped after September 11th. It was renamed RAW and the second hour the RAW Zone. |
|
|
|
Post by onemoretime on Aug 30, 2007 6:29:59 GMT -5
No, it was always Raw is War/War Zone. Yeah, RAW is WAR stopped after September 11th. It was renamed RAW and the second hour the RAW Zone. Why would both hours need different names? I've never understood that. I'm cool with watching RAW for two hours, as opposed to RAw and RAW ZONE or whatever. |
|
|
|
Post by cccmrkennedy on Aug 30, 2007 6:38:57 GMT -5
Yeah, RAW is WAR stopped after September 11th. It was renamed RAW and the second hour the RAW Zone. Why would both hours need different names? I've never understood that. I'm cool with watching RAW for two hours, as opposed to RAw and RAW ZONE or whatever. Well, it was to signify a change in programming. The first hour was more like Heat, not as risque and not as many main eventers. The second hour made note of their would be more risque storylines and action, and better superstars. |
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Aug 30, 2007 11:27:01 GMT -5
Why would both hours need different names? I've never understood that. I'm cool with watching RAW for two hours, as opposed to RAw and RAW ZONE or whatever. Well, it was to signify a change in programming. The first hour was more like Heat, not as risque and not as many main eventers. The second hour made note of their would be more risque storylines and action, and better superstars. And it was also for Nielsen ratings purposes. WWE could/can claim that they have two of the highest rated cable programs. |
|
