|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Sept 21, 2007 8:32:41 GMT -5
Do you think that the Raw roster is to excessive when it comes to high quality superstars. I think with the large amount of high quality talent such as Cena, Orton, HHH, HBK, Lashley, etc they just drown any other talent on there. Like other who would come across to Raw no matter how good they are they would probably 'drown' in the talent. Raw has too many high profilers but its not that great and the better superstars should be more spread IMO. What do you think? Has Raw got to much top talent drowning others out that could be better used if spread out more?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 6, 2024 19:51:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 21, 2007 8:42:38 GMT -5
I don't blame it on too much talent. I blame it on bad storylines, stale gimmicks, predictable outcomes, etc.
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Sept 21, 2007 8:42:56 GMT -5
Yes. It's to much & the younger guys aren't getting over.
|
|
|
Post by discoenforcer on Sept 21, 2007 8:58:11 GMT -5
I know ۩ ™kaneisdaman™ ۩ Kennedy and HBK should be on Smackdown thats why Big stars get injured a lot.
Because they need some short break, not wrestling a 60 minute match (HBK.........) but if they spread a bit of the big talent to smackodwn and ecw they wouldnt get hurt that much, because they could be the biggest thing there.
|
|
|
Post by Rated-R-Superstar-159 on Sept 21, 2007 9:16:53 GMT -5
i think each brand has equal talent.
|
|
|
Post by Sexy White Chocolate on Sept 21, 2007 9:35:50 GMT -5
Ecw has nothing left almost move at least mid card guys there. Move 2 headliners to smackdown and then its even.
|
|
|
Post by muffin2xtreme on Sept 21, 2007 10:42:02 GMT -5
dump all the crappy once to ecw then they would fit in (- punk,boogey, and morrison)
|
|