|
|
Post by mrlayzie2007 on Sept 28, 2007 9:58:43 GMT -5
Lesnar Hands Down
even though he threw it away he still had the best year for a rookie in history.
|
|
|
|
Post by megs on Sept 28, 2007 10:50:50 GMT -5
Goooooooooooooolllllllllldddddddddberg
|
|
|
|
Post by VK on Sept 28, 2007 12:23:11 GMT -5
Kurt Angle. Nothing will ever change my mind, that Lesnar DID NOT deserved any of the things mentioned above this post. It's not about whether anyone deserved it or not it's about the best rookie year ever, and I'd say that Brock Lesnar takes the cake on that. Angle and Goldberg could also lay claim to that distinction. |
|
|
|
Post by HugoOne on Sept 28, 2007 14:06:38 GMT -5
Kurt Angle. Nothing will ever change my mind, that Lesnar DID NOT deserved any of the things mentioned above this post. Why not? Why does everybody hate him for chasing his #1 dream? Do you hate The Rock as well? The Rock is a MUCH bigger sellout than Brock. [/quote] 1, I don't believe that was his number one dream. If it was, he would have stuck with it longer than he did. 2, everyone hates Lesnar for being pushed to the moon for something he didn't deserve. Whereas Kurt was at least entertaining and had brilliant mic skills and wrestling ability in his first year, Lesnar was still pretty bland personality wise. And his head looked like belonged on a ten year old. 3, The Rock never sold out. Is it that illogical to choose a career that's so much less taxing on your body and make more money, while getting to spend more time with your family? Not even thinking about the fact that the Rock virtually has nothing left he needs to accomplish in wrestling. The only reason I'd want to see him come back is to wrestle Michaels, and I highly doubt that will ever happen. I'd say Angle, in response to the question. |
|
