|
Post by THE *Legendary* STINGER on Nov 12, 2007 2:20:15 GMT -5
Is in TNA. If you dont know.... Now ya know.
|
|
|
Post by dancinfatass on Nov 12, 2007 2:20:58 GMT -5
I dig it, sucka.
|
|
|
Post by trivium666 on Nov 12, 2007 2:29:49 GMT -5
that my friends, is a smart move for TNA.
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Nov 12, 2007 2:43:31 GMT -5
1.3 bound
|
|
|
Post by rkolegendkilla on Nov 12, 2007 3:06:55 GMT -5
I don't care/10.
Because Angle made such a MASSIVE inprint when he jumped ship. Sorry to crush your hopes, TNA marks.
... le sigh.
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Nov 12, 2007 3:07:56 GMT -5
Yeah. Angle, Christian, Pacman Jones, and all the other people who brought in "big improvements" to TNA will have NOTHING on Booker.
|
|
|
Post by rkolegendkilla on Nov 12, 2007 3:10:06 GMT -5
Oh, don't forget TEH STINGER!!!1!
He boosted the ratings to 1.1 for a week or so.
|
|
|
Post by skribbel24 on Nov 12, 2007 3:12:49 GMT -5
Booker is a big loss to WWE and a huge addition to TNA.
|
|
|
Post by The UndyTaker on Nov 12, 2007 3:38:48 GMT -5
(without Booker)Last week's Impact-1.11 (with Booker)This week's Impact-1.12
|
|
Returnal
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 5, 2005 3:05:14 GMT -5
Posts: 3,679
|
Post by Returnal on Nov 12, 2007 4:14:24 GMT -5
You guys should want TNA to succeed so you see another ratings war and so WWE improves the product.
Don't bash TNA because if they start to get bigger and better soon WWE will have to improve there product heaps and then both shows will be awesome.
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Nov 12, 2007 4:28:56 GMT -5
You guys should want TNA to succeed so you see another ratings war and so WWE improves the product. Don't bash TNA because if they start to get bigger and better soon WWE will have to improve there product heaps and then both shows will be awesome. The only problem is after 5 years they still arent improving. Its not like people are bashing TNA only, check out the Raw threads...They bash the WWE as well...Wrestling in general is just down. Also with Impact being on Thursday its not gonna change anything. Only way they compete is if Impact goes to Monday..There is no war if your not fighting the same war
|
|
|
Post by rkolegendkilla on Nov 12, 2007 4:29:06 GMT -5
TNA will never get near WWE.
Don't get me wrong, I'd LOVE to see another ratings war, but it's just not gonna happen.
|
|
Returnal
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 5, 2005 3:05:14 GMT -5
Posts: 3,679
|
Post by Returnal on Nov 12, 2007 4:32:49 GMT -5
You guys should want TNA to succeed so you see another ratings war and so WWE improves the product. Don't bash TNA because if they start to get bigger and better soon WWE will have to improve there product heaps and then both shows will be awesome. The only problem is after 5 years they still arent improving. Its not like people are bashing TNA only, check out the Raw threads...They bash the WWE as well...Wrestling in general is just down. Also with Impact being on Thursday its not gonna change anything. Only way they compete is if Impact goes to Monday..There is no war if your not fighting the same war I believe TNA is getting there. Currently i think they need the big names to draw the casual fans. Mainstream wrestling is down the indys are fantastic currently. TNA will eventually improve they've had 5 years and they've done so much. They have 2 hours on prime time each week. Currently TNA isnt in WWE's league i agree with that but maybe in 5 years TNA will be right up with WWE. Or they might be dead i don't know but either way it's exciting to see what will happen.
|
|
Fury
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 21, 2007 21:19:09 GMT -5
Posts: 4,257
|
Post by Fury on Nov 12, 2007 4:39:14 GMT -5
Seriously if Angle can't boost up the ratings than no one bar the big 3 (Hogan, Rock, Austin) could.
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Nov 12, 2007 4:59:22 GMT -5
(without Booker)Last week's Impact-1.11 (with Booker)This week's Impact-1.12 That would be good if it was true but TNA got a 1.5 last week.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 25, 2024 23:43:12 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2007 5:13:39 GMT -5
Between the years of 1982-85, Vince McMahon created a monster, that's just 3 years it took to build the WWE. I like TNA, but 2002-07 is 5 years and what have they accomplished?
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Nov 12, 2007 5:20:21 GMT -5
Lol, TNA didn't get a 1.5
And I doubt it will even be around in 5 years, unless someone is stupid enough to go 10 years losing mass amounts of money..
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Nov 12, 2007 5:28:47 GMT -5
The only problem is after 5 years they still arent improving. Its not like people are bashing TNA only, check out the Raw threads...They bash the WWE as well...Wrestling in general is just down. Also with Impact being on Thursday its not gonna change anything. Only way they compete is if Impact goes to Monday..There is no war if your not fighting the same war I believe TNA is getting there. Currently i think they need the big names to draw the casual fans. Mainstream wrestling is down the indys are fantastic currently. TNA will eventually improve they've had 5 years and they've done so much. They have 2 hours on prime time each week. Currently TNA isnt in WWE's league i agree with that but maybe in 5 years TNA will be right up with WWE. Or they might be dead i don't know but either way it's exciting to see what will happen. They're really not getting anywhere. WCW Thunder had better ratings on Thursday then 2 hour Impact did. Everything in TNA is just so cluster ed...One minute Angle is being pushed as a Heel against Joe, then then next hes a face against Cage then back to a heel with Sting....They have so much young talent but insist on having Angle, Nash, Sting and now Booker T carrying the company...John Cena might not have any talent but he puts butts in the seats and sells merchandise
|
|
Wago
Main Eventer
Prepare To Get Wagowned.
Joined on: Mar 29, 2006 9:11:27 GMT -5
Posts: 1,495
|
Post by Wago on Nov 12, 2007 6:33:47 GMT -5
Is in TNA. If you dont know.... Now ya know. Do you watch Youtube shooting or somethng, I heard that line not to long back and you just reminded me of it, heh. Anyway on topic, aslong as Booker is used right and doesn't wrestle the 'E' style then I i will be happy.
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Nov 12, 2007 6:35:27 GMT -5
TNA is not getting good ratings becasue of Piss poor booking. If Angle, cage, sting, hall, nash, etc cant even make a dent in the ratings then the problem is not more big name talent. the problem is having a product that people actually want to see, an alternative...not the same thing and not unbearable storylines. alot of people dont give TNA a chance becasue, well at least since their 2 hour slot, the booking has been atrocious. Yet Jeff Jarret just cant seem to see this
|
|