|
|
Post by CBT on Nov 24, 2007 0:14:01 GMT -5
I mean, really. These guys just keep drifting further and further apart from each other.
This to me would be an off the charts, Wrestlemania 24 match.
|
|
|
|
Post by cia on Nov 24, 2007 0:15:50 GMT -5
Doubt it. I loved the ending to the Royal Rumble, with them facing off.
It had a real electricity. & we're going into 08.
|
|
|
|
Post by taker1 on Nov 24, 2007 0:17:35 GMT -5
Obviously not in 2007. Hopefully we'll see the match next year because it probably wouldn't be so good if it happened again in 2009 or later..
Personally, I want to see Undertaker/Triple H in Hell in a Cell first. The two masters of the cell going at it..
|
|
Ari Gold
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 16, 2007 20:04:07 GMT -5
Posts: 2,346
|
Post by Ari Gold on Nov 24, 2007 0:29:11 GMT -5
yea man all we can do is hope..but i doubt it will ever happen again.
|
|
|
|
Post by DgenerationX092 on Nov 24, 2007 0:42:24 GMT -5
ya royal rumble 2007 was really cool with them going at it. it would be awesome
|
|
The Stranger
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 21, 2007 1:09:47 GMT -5
Posts: 2,200
|
Post by The Stranger on Nov 24, 2007 1:09:34 GMT -5
best moment of 2007 by far was the ending to the royal rumble. goosebumps. a wm24 match between the two would be incredible.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 8, 2024 10:55:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2007 1:42:19 GMT -5
Obviously not in 2007. Hopefully we'll see the match next year because it probably wouldn't be so good if it happened again in 2009 or later.. Personally, I want to see Undertaker/Triple H in Hell in a Cell first. The two masters of the cell going at it.. Cell matches have sucked since No Mercy 2002, but I see your point. |
|
|
|
Post by xbonex80 on Nov 24, 2007 1:52:11 GMT -5
But Michaels and Taker at WM24... it would mean either another job done by Michaels or Taker's winning streak being put to an end. Maybe Summerslam?
|
|
|
|
Post by skribbel24 on Nov 24, 2007 1:58:34 GMT -5
That would be great, but I would hate to see HBK job again.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sound888 on Nov 24, 2007 2:11:24 GMT -5
Obviously not in 2007. Hopefully we'll see the match next year because it probably wouldn't be so good if it happened again in 2009 or later.. Personally, I want to see Undertaker/Triple H in Hell in a Cell first. The two masters of the cell going at it.. Cell matches have sucked since No Mercy 2002, but I see your point. Bad Blood 2004 |
|
|
|
Post by HugoOne on Nov 24, 2007 4:03:35 GMT -5
They don't need something like that for Wrestlemania, it would probably work better at a Summerslam. But I'd love to see if they could do it one more time. The Royal Rumble was such a cock tease.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Nov 24, 2007 8:11:07 GMT -5
I think without a doubt they were lining it up for Summerslam 2007 this year, but Undertaker got ruled out injured, followed by HBK.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Nov 24, 2007 8:23:07 GMT -5
I would doubt it. I don't know who would job to whom. Both have a lot of backstage pull and neither would really benefit by a win over the other.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 8, 2024 10:55:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2007 10:20:33 GMT -5
Cell matches have sucked since No Mercy 2002, but I see your point. Bad Blood 2004 They didnt fight on the cage, they didnt have a memorable moment in that match, it was just a typical street fight with a pointless cage surrounding it. It defeats the purpose of having a cell if nobody actually uses it during the match. |
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Nov 24, 2007 11:23:45 GMT -5
I've been waiting for another Taker/HBK feud for years... their feud was a large factor in what drew me into WWE in the first place. Their hell in a cell match was the first, and easily the best. I'm sure they'll cross paths one more time before either retires. Vince would be an idiot not to see the potential dollar signs...
|
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Nov 24, 2007 12:33:25 GMT -5
Sorry, I should have just made it as a whole.
Like, "Are we ever gonna get..."
|
|
|
|
Post by perilloboy123 on Nov 24, 2007 12:35:24 GMT -5
Sorry, but I don't see it happening until 2008.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 8, 2024 10:55:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2007 12:39:25 GMT -5
They didnt fight on the cage, they didnt have a memorable moment in that match, it was just a typical street fight with a pointless cage surrounding it. It defeats the purpose of having a cell if nobody actually uses it during the match. There doesnt have to be action on top of the cage for it to be good. Cell matches usually always rock. Saying someone needs thrown off it everytime one happens is  ing idiotic, because they could be seriously injured, and just because Foley did it twice doesnt mean they should continue to do it |
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Nov 24, 2007 12:45:01 GMT -5
They didnt fight on the cage, they didnt have a memorable moment in that match, it was just a typical street fight with a pointless cage surrounding it. It defeats the purpose of having a cell if nobody actually uses it during the match. There doesnt have to be action on top of the cage for it to be good. Cell matches usually always rock. Saying someone needs thrown off it everytime one happens is ing idiotic, because they could be seriously injured, and just because Foley did it twice doesnt mean they should continue to do it Not to mention, the Armageddon one from years past... with 6 men inside the Cell. If the Rikishi bump off the cell was non-existant, the match would have still owned. It doesn't hurt to leave the Cell. Sure the idea is entraptment, but it should not be a match just any one can compete in and survive unscarred. |
|
|
|
Post by chumped on Nov 24, 2007 13:01:52 GMT -5
Obviously not in 2007. Hopefully we'll see the match next year because it probably wouldn't be so good if it happened again in 2009 or later.. Personally, I want to see Undertaker/Triple H in Hell in a Cell first. The two masters of the cell going at it..Amen. |
|
