E-Noon
Main Eventer
"Classic"
Joined on: Mar 30, 2004 17:11:23 GMT -5
Posts: 3,567
|
Post by E-Noon on Dec 12, 2007 11:16:30 GMT -5
WWE Raw 15th Anniversary Show Scores A Huge Rating Submitted by Daniel Pena on Tuesday, December 11, 2007 at 6:17 PM EST
source: Wrestling Observer
Last night's 15th Raw Anniversary show scored a huge rating. The final two hours of the show drew a 4.4 rating. The first hour rating has yet to come in.
If you only take those two hours into account, this would be the highest rated Raw of the year. Also, last night's show was the highest rated show since the 6/18 Raw -- the show after the McMahon limousine explosion, which scored a 4.1.
This makes more sense than the 4.1 that was reported earlier.
...and in a unrelated note, I seen that the CM Punk "chat" has been locked, and I cant believe how many people bought into that rumour, some people in these forums kill me.
Wrestling rumuor site will pretty much write anything for someone to view thier pages. Like how they reported that had SUPPOSEDLY put his notice in that he was leaving, but a week later he was somehow convinced to stay.
All Im trying to say is dont believe everything you read, these websites are the same thing as gossip magazines, they say anthing just to stir up some sh*t.
**edit, my bad on the ratings thing I must of misread it, all I saw was 4.1. Again, my bad.
|
|
Mirror Images
Main Eventer
fan since '92
Joined on: Jun 7, 2005 4:07:40 GMT -5
Posts: 2,809
|
Post by Mirror Images on Dec 12, 2007 12:31:10 GMT -5
Caring about ratings is soooooo 1998 ;D
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Dec 12, 2007 12:32:13 GMT -5
It was a good show, I'm glad it did well
|
|
|
Post by bad guy™ on Dec 12, 2007 12:34:57 GMT -5
Caring about ratings is soooooo 1998 ;D Yep!
|
|
|
Post by vaclav on Dec 12, 2007 16:40:29 GMT -5
isn't Daniel Pena that kid from the make a wish, that was made honorary GM for a day back in april?
|
|
|
Post by The UndyTaker on Dec 12, 2007 17:01:14 GMT -5
Glad the ratings were that good.
The "wrestling news" sites are so bogus. About 30% is true of the articles. The rest are lies and predictions. Lies make more people read. I was on a site today and an article was titled something like OFF AIR RAW NOTES. It was just a rundown and opinions of what happened on RAW from a guy who was there. That's it. Oh, it said they let people into the building. WOW, that's news. It's always funny when a "news" site reports something big that's supposed to happen, but then they will say something like "but that's subject to change". That's because most likely it is a lie that was made up so you will read the site.
I believe maybe 30% of what I read on sites. Between the lies, predictions, and writers personal agendas, they aren't worth much to me. And I personally don't give a flying fig about what any writers think about the show.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Dec 12, 2007 20:13:01 GMT -5
Where the is Hatebomb now?! HMMM
|
|