|
Post by foshizzle on Jan 6, 2008 19:20:47 GMT -5
Rock Vs Michaels Would be back and fourth, but I see Michaels letting Rock beat him after a Rock Bottom. I would love for HBK to win, but I don't see it.
BTW, I would mark for a double nip up at the same time.
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Jan 6, 2008 19:32:54 GMT -5
when hbk reffed the hhh/rock match on sd! in 2000/2001, i remember thinking of the prospect of hbk/rock being a really good match...a lot of energy from both, it would be quick-paced.
|
|
|
Post by twosober on Jan 6, 2008 21:38:53 GMT -5
i think that hbk pic is creeping me out, tbh
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Jan 7, 2008 4:12:12 GMT -5
HBK has a cleff lol
|
|
|
Post by miserere on Jan 7, 2008 7:11:54 GMT -5
The Rock would come back and win. And Rightfully so. But that would cause HBK to over sell the Rock Bottom, and fake a heart attack during the Peoples Elbow. Then when they get backstage, he will have a mid life crisis because he just had to job to a returning legend. lol "legend" The Rock wrestled for like, 4 years and had a handful of bit appearances thereafter and he's a legend? I don't see why everybody loves the Rock now. He was always so hated as a face, and people would go to Cena-like levels of hatred with him, calling him stale, saying he has 5 moves (which may be true), etc. The fact that neither wrestler has anything to gain from this is exactly why it would happen. Wrestlers aren't allowed to wrestle for the sake of, gee, I don't know, wrestling? Does someone always have to benefit from the decision? Take Rock vs. Hogan, Michaels vs. Flair, and Michaels vs. Hogan. All dream match-ups that happened because it was damn cool to see. And if you can get a good match out of it, what's to lose?
|
|