|
|
Post by hardyboyzwwe on Mar 16, 2008 10:24:39 GMT -5
What is your favorite WWE/F title of all time? Mine would be the hardcore title because it was defended 24/7 and in a hardcore title match it would always be a great match. I wish they never got rid of it. And also, can somebody tell me why they got rid of it. But anyway, what is your favorite title?
|
|
|
|
Post by rbwwejakks on Mar 16, 2008 10:28:10 GMT -5
I think the Intercontenental Championship has always been one of my favourite championship belts. There has been a lot of superstars who have never been able to capture the WWE Title, but where able to capture the IC Title. I think its a great belt and has a lot of history. Mostly all the greatest superstars who havent been able to capture the WWE Title has all been the IC Champion.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wrestlaholic on Mar 16, 2008 10:41:40 GMT -5
Undisputed for sure, always loved that title. Hate that bloody spinning thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by MondayRaw on Mar 16, 2008 11:26:37 GMT -5
The hardcore title. I love those type of matches
|
|
|
|
Post by kanekilledvince on Mar 16, 2008 11:29:51 GMT -5
Undisputed for sure, always loved that title. Hate that bloody spinning thing. I think he means historically, not materialistically. A agree with the Intercontinental championship post above. It's had some major amazing talent hold it. Some of the greats from Razor Ramon to Shelton Benjamin held it. People who are great wrestlers and who people love, but just didnt get the main event push (Hopefully that changes for Benjamin). I think it has a great history. I also think that the current Intercontinental championship design is the nicest in WWE History. Its a beautiful belt. |
|
newfrigginshow
Main Eventer
NFS
Joined on: Jul 13, 2006 8:23:46 GMT -5
Posts: 1,427
|
Post by newfrigginshow on Mar 16, 2008 12:04:03 GMT -5
Undisputed. They should have just kept it that way. How can you unify belts then split them up again.
|
|
|
|
Post by chumped on Mar 16, 2008 12:06:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Stevo on Mar 16, 2008 12:18:18 GMT -5
WWE Title. In all honesty, it hasn't seen an EXTREMELY bad champion in its entire history. Who are the worst? Sid, Yoko, Vince, Cena? If those are the worst guys to hold the belt, then its doing pretty good.
|
|
|
|
Post by perilloboy123 on Mar 16, 2008 12:19:00 GMT -5
Hardcore, hands down. I wish they'd bring it back.
|
|
|
|
Post by ztj_wwf on Mar 16, 2008 12:32:01 GMT -5
You missed so many titles, the Tag titles, European, Light-Heavyweight....
|
|
|
|
Post by hardyboyzwwe on Mar 16, 2008 12:47:53 GMT -5
You missed so many titles, the Tag titles, European, Light-Heavyweight.... That's why I put "Other" as a choice. |
|
|
|
Post by -Edge- on Mar 16, 2008 12:49:48 GMT -5
Hardcore title, even though i was watching wrestling when they had the title, i know all about it and how it was used, they should bring it back
|
|
|
|
Post by Quanthor on Mar 16, 2008 13:01:09 GMT -5
Hardcore is by far the stupidest title ever, I can't believe anybody would prefer that nor vote for that belt. Here's the belts I like Circa 1987 belt  Classic IC belt  Attitude era belt  |
|
B.D. & El G.
Main Eventer
RIP SNS 2/15/82 - 4/11/11
Joined on: Jan 2, 2008 17:52:29 GMT -5
Posts: 4,113
|
Post by B.D. & El G. on Mar 16, 2008 13:45:48 GMT -5
Hardcore because it made for some funny segments
|
|
|
|
Post by 49% Motherf**ker, 51% SOB on Mar 16, 2008 15:03:11 GMT -5
WWE Title. In all honesty, it hasn't seen an EXTREMELY bad champion in its entire history. Who are the worst? Sid, Yoko, Vince, Cena? If those are the worst guys to hold the belt, then its doing pretty good. I don't know how you could say Cena is a bad champion. He sells tickets,merchandise, and does everything they ask him to do. I am not saying you, but just because a lot of people don't like him makes him a bad champion. |
|
|
|
Post by Stevo on Mar 16, 2008 15:44:14 GMT -5
WWE Title. In all honesty, it hasn't seen an EXTREMELY bad champion in its entire history. Who are the worst? Sid, Yoko, Vince, Cena? If those are the worst guys to hold the belt, then its doing pretty good. I don't know how you could say Cena is a bad champion. He sells tickets,merchandise, and does everything they ask him to do. I am not saying you, but just because a lot of people don't like him makes him a bad champion. Its more because we saw the same beaten-to-death routine for a year straight. Did he have his good matches? Yeah. Did he sell a couple of tickets? Yeah. But to have him hold a belt for a year straight, when people were already tired of him BEFORE he regained the belt? Not a good move, imo. And again, if we have Cena as "one of the worst" champions we've seen in a while, then the belt is in good shape. Cena is also far better than Yoko, Sid, and Vince ever were. |
|
|
|
Post by Blazer034 on Mar 16, 2008 17:38:31 GMT -5
I like the WWE Undisputed Title. Just for the simple fact, One Champion for both shows.
|
|
T1
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 23, 2008 11:51:45 GMT -5
Posts: 2,511
|
Post by T1 on Mar 16, 2008 17:49:44 GMT -5
Undisputed Title was great, such a unique time period in wrestling history. There was NO other World Title, no WCW, no ECW, no World Heavyweight Championship, no TNA. Only the NWA Title, which wasn't even a World Title then( and isn't now either).
And it was cool because the brand extension just started and the champion got to be on both shows, against a different crop of talent.
I've also always loved the U.S. Title. It's the new stepping stone belt in WWE.
|
|
|
|
Post by ToastMaster General on Mar 16, 2008 18:11:57 GMT -5
I voted I-C. It's the stepping stone to the WWE title and had most of the best wrestlers as it's champion since 1979.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mac on Mar 16, 2008 18:45:12 GMT -5
Hardcore
|
|
