Post by naparo01 on Apr 29, 2008 12:42:13 GMT -5
OKay so i was looking at my figs and have always complaned about the size of the DA bicept. BUt When it ocmes down to it RA ones are Huge too.
So i decided to do a bit of a comparison using a simple proportion.
So lets say the average wrestling irs 6 feet tall thats 72 inches
x= true live bicept size
y= fig bicept
z= fig hight
so if you do
x/72 = y/z you can figure out what a fig would look like if he were blown up to real life just to ge t a sence of scale
Here are the arm measurments i came up wiht
Standared RA arms: 28.2 inch bicepts!! move over hogan
smaller ra cruser weight arm s(eg tully blanchard): 20.6
TTL fig: 21.3 inces
DA fig: 25inchers
Just thought i would share my little observation.
So i decided to do a bit of a comparison using a simple proportion.
So lets say the average wrestling irs 6 feet tall thats 72 inches
x= true live bicept size
y= fig bicept
z= fig hight
so if you do
x/72 = y/z you can figure out what a fig would look like if he were blown up to real life just to ge t a sence of scale
Here are the arm measurments i came up wiht
Standared RA arms: 28.2 inch bicepts!! move over hogan
smaller ra cruser weight arm s(eg tully blanchard): 20.6
TTL fig: 21.3 inces
DA fig: 25inchers
Just thought i would share my little observation.
