|
|
Post by kennethtogash on Oct 25, 2008 5:46:24 GMT -5
Hogan vs Warrior 2 is ten today!
Happy B-day to Hogan vs Warrior 2!!
Discuss.....
|
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Oct 25, 2008 6:06:42 GMT -5
Hogan vs Warrior 1 was bad enough....V2 was terrible...I just realized its been just over 11 years since we lost Brian Pillman  |
|
|
|
Post by DTP. on Oct 25, 2008 6:56:20 GMT -5
Isn't this the fifth year anniversary of Triple H and Stephanie's real life marriage too? Or was that October 21st? I can't remember.
|
|
|
|
Post by pineappleexpress on Oct 25, 2008 7:01:46 GMT -5
I was watching the Ultimate Warrior DVD earlier in the week when I couldn't sleep and it brought back the memories of that oh so classic train wreck.
|
|
raz2005uk
Main Eventer
Over 15 UK refs & 14 INT. refs now too! 1st WFUK member to get Rock Family 3 Pack :)
Joined on: Nov 20, 2005 7:57:02 GMT -5
Posts: 3,500
|
Post by raz2005uk on Oct 25, 2008 8:42:45 GMT -5
I just wish Hogan had singed all the hair left on his bald head when he screwed up that fireball
|
|
redypiper
Main Eventer
bravery over timidity
Joined on: Jun 29, 2005 19:51:33 GMT -5
Posts: 2,946
|
Post by redypiper on Oct 25, 2008 12:46:21 GMT -5
i saw that event live. i was 13 so i didn't really know it was that bad.
wow, ten years already.
|
|
Jackson!
Main Eventer
@mathewjackson_
Joined on: Oct 13, 2008 23:30:03 GMT -5
Posts: 1,474
|
Post by Jackson! on Oct 25, 2008 12:54:05 GMT -5
thats like celebrating the anniversary of brock vs goldberg, le sigh.
|
|
|
|
Post by HugoOne on Oct 25, 2008 15:23:18 GMT -5
i saw that event live. i was 13 so i didn't really know it was that bad. wow, ten years already. Isn't that the best? I saw Undertaker vs. Undertaker at Summerslam 1994 when I was 8, and I loved it. I've never watched it since, and I know it's going to be horrible if I ever watch it again. |
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Oct 25, 2008 15:35:44 GMT -5
i saw that event live. i was 13 so i didn't really know it was that bad. wow, ten years already. Isn't that the best? I saw Undertaker vs. Undertaker at Summerslam 1994 when I was 8, and I loved it. I've never watched it since, and I know it's going to be horrible if I ever watch it again. I wouldnt say horrible, unlike hogan and warrior, Taker and Brian Lee can actually wrestle |
|
|
|
Post by kennethtogash on Oct 25, 2008 17:16:47 GMT -5
It was a rematch of a huge match in wrestling history so I thought I would bring it up even though it was a horrible match.
|
|
DKR
Main Eventer
It's all good...
Joined on: Feb 13, 2008 13:23:53 GMT -5
Posts: 3,916
|
Post by DKR on Oct 26, 2008 17:41:13 GMT -5
Hogan/Warrior I was huge IMO, and wasn't that bad of a match.
Hogan/Warrior II...well that was pretty bad, but it had some nostalgia to it.
|
|
|
|
Post by layton on Oct 28, 2008 10:00:27 GMT -5
Isn't this the fifth year anniversary of Triple H and Stephanie's real life marriage too? Or was that October 21st? I can't remember. Oct. 24 |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 6, 2024 15:17:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2008 14:33:46 GMT -5
yeah HH vs UW II was some bad noise for sure.dont know what I was expecting at the time-but it wasnt what we got  |
|
Dwight
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 10, 2007 11:02:46 GMT -5
Posts: 2,686
|
Post by Dwight on Oct 28, 2008 22:31:33 GMT -5
First match was huge just because of how big both of those guys were. It wasn't a horrible match by any means.
The second match was pointless, stupid, and horrible. For WCW to think that people really cared about a Warrior/Hogan rematch 8 years after the fact is amazing. Even as a kid I thought it was odd.
|
|
nibs92
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 29, 2008 5:47:21 GMT -5
Posts: 2,240
|
Post by nibs92 on Oct 29, 2008 8:45:05 GMT -5
is it true that the main reason for this match was because hogan wanted to make up for his loss at wm6? if so then that's pretty pathetic!
|
|
Jackson!
Main Eventer
@mathewjackson_
Joined on: Oct 13, 2008 23:30:03 GMT -5
Posts: 1,474
|
Post by Jackson! on Oct 29, 2008 11:56:49 GMT -5
is it true that the main reason for this match was because hogan wanted to make up for his loss at wm6? if so then that's pretty pathetic! the only thing wrong with that is...that can be the main reason too, its sad. |
|
Dwight
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 10, 2007 11:02:46 GMT -5
Posts: 2,686
|
Post by Dwight on Oct 29, 2008 14:26:03 GMT -5
is it true that the main reason for this match was because hogan wanted to make up for his loss at wm6? if so then that's pretty pathetic! I highly doubt that. It can't be proven either way but I don't believe that. Its been rumored becasue of Hogan's well known ego. But that doesn't mean thats why it happened. WCW signed Warrior because they hoped they could do something with him and be successful. The problem was, no one really cares to see Warrior wrestle. They only enjoy his character and the fact is that character wasn't good enough for the very edgy year of 1998. |
|
The Boglin
Main Eventer
Team Goldie.
Joined on: Apr 20, 2005 16:46:22 GMT -5
Posts: 4,171
|
Post by The Boglin on Oct 30, 2008 11:38:23 GMT -5
The first match was great and just by pure excitement has been anything like it since.
|
|
