|
Post by j2dacversion3 on Dec 6, 2008 1:43:17 GMT -5
I wish cancer upon Triple H. ing sue me, you ing pussies.
|
|
COCK & BLAST
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 26, 2007 14:00:28 GMT -5
Posts: 1,875
|
Post by COCK & BLAST on Dec 6, 2008 2:57:27 GMT -5
I wish cancer upon Triple H. ing sue me, you ing pussies. you are so pleasant.
|
|
Get A Rhythm™
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 25, 2007 4:17:23 GMT -5
Posts: 2,120
|
Post by Get A Rhythm™ on Dec 6, 2008 3:12:25 GMT -5
Triple H is a good champion and I've had no problem with his long title reigns. He's good in the ring, stellar on the mic and can be very humorous. He's great at playing both face and heel roles, and he doesn't ruthlessly bury people anymore. He's gotten so many wins over Hardy because he should. If he really wanted to make Hardy look bad, he wouldn't look the way he does when they're in the same ring together. That's because he sees something in Hardy. There's really just not anyone good enough to take the place of guys like Triple H and Shawn Michaels. I'm sure there are superior athletes, but I don't think it's possible to build stars like the Rock, Austin, HHH, and HBK anymore. The closest they've come is with Cena, and many people disagree with that.
But yeah.. I'm getting way off topic here. I started typing one thing and it led to somethin else.
|
|
|
Post by AndyPeck13 on Dec 6, 2008 3:28:54 GMT -5
I wish cancer upon Triple H. ing sue me, you ing pussies. i hope this was a joke... otherwise you're a very sad person...
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 26, 2024 18:23:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 6, 2008 4:11:47 GMT -5
That would've made sense, but you know, the fact that before Backlash of this year Triple H hadn't been World (or WWE) Champion since 2005. People can dispute that he had the title for like...2 hours in October of 2007, but come on people, that barely counts. The thing that you seem to leave out is that HHH got hurt early in 2007 and was out for several months. If he would have made it to Wrestlemania 23 he would have won the title from Cena. Bottom line is HHH has hurt this business a lot. I also want to add that Triple H is not a great wrestler. Hulk is not a great mat wrestler, but Hulk understands and shows respect to the fans. Triple H shows no respect to the fans hardly at all. He gets on the air and just takes shots at all kinds of wrestlers like Hulk, and what does that do that is not showing respect to fans at all. Hulk will take shots at people but not on the air usually. I don't like Triple H for what he has done to wrestling, but I do not wish anything bad upon him like some other guy that posted above me.
|
|
flying-shorty
Main Eventer
Take a bow
Joined on: Jul 12, 2005 8:30:30 GMT -5
Posts: 4,778
|
Post by flying-shorty on Dec 6, 2008 5:38:12 GMT -5
Its not that accurate a statement, HHH doesnt hog the tv as much as he once did. I remember a time when every episode of raw an smackdown started with a 20min promo from hhh, or steph mcmahon an hhh. Not as bad these days. Tbh I dont really hav any issues with hogan, but havin Hogan 'hulk up' half way through a bout, and be invincible to punches, kicks etc probably exposes the business alot more...Im not sayin HHH is good for the business, coz i kno he is a big contributor to backstage politics but hogans statement isnt really fair i wudnt say...
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 26, 2024 18:23:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 6, 2008 7:14:02 GMT -5
Hogan and HHH have always had heat dating waaay back to 2002 when Hogan beat HHH for the strap.
Vinnie insisted Hogan go over and Stephanie with urgings from ol "Hunter Heatkiller Helsmley"had an absolute tantrum backstage.....
so I never really pay attention to what Hogan says about him or vice versa.they hate the sight of one another.
|
|
|
Post by wyleecyotee on Dec 6, 2008 7:20:48 GMT -5
Hogan has always been cool
Hulkamania forever
|
|
Nirvana is Happiness
Main Eventer
R.I.P Heath Ledger, we will never forget you.
Joined on: Jun 4, 2005 21:15:06 GMT -5
Posts: 2,586
|
Post by Nirvana is Happiness on Dec 6, 2008 10:31:28 GMT -5
HHH can atleast work a match, a pretty damn good match at that, too.
|
|
|
Post by abyss on Dec 6, 2008 11:44:20 GMT -5
Just sounds like he's trying to take cheap shots at the WWE for the hell of it...
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Dec 6, 2008 11:53:03 GMT -5
I think I worked it out that out of the past 6 years (the time period Hogan mentions), Triple H has been World or WWE Champion for about 22 months. 22 months out of 72 is...roughly 31%.
Last time I was in school, 31% was an epic fail.
|
|
Stinger TNA
Main Eventer
"Support TNA"
Joined on: Mar 31, 2010 19:21:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,481
|
Post by Stinger TNA on Dec 6, 2008 11:53:40 GMT -5
I agree with Hogan on this matter.
|
|
|
Post by j2dacversion3 on Dec 6, 2008 11:55:44 GMT -5
I wish cancer upon Triple H. ing sue me, you ing pussies. i hope this was a joke... otherwise you're a very sad person... It was. But yeah, I'm totally with Hogan on this one, Triple H is really ruining the company for me with his title reigns. It's time for him to step out of the title picture for a couple years.
|
|
|
Post by lancewiget on Dec 6, 2008 12:01:39 GMT -5
I think I worked it out that out of the past 6 years (the time period Hogan mentions), Triple H has been World or WWE Champion for about 22 months. 22 months out of 72 is...roughly 31%. Last time I was in school, 31% was an epic fail. Really... when I did my A-Levels 12 years ago... 31% was a pass.
|
|
Hollywood QJD
Main Eventer
Awesome Enters
Joined on: Aug 27, 2008 15:03:06 GMT -5
Posts: 4,040
|
Post by Hollywood QJD on Dec 6, 2008 12:30:03 GMT -5
HHH has barely held the title since he lost it to Batista at WrestleMania. I'm calling it now, he'll make it 25 reigns. After all, who gives a poop about the number of days you hold it? I'm sure that HHH just wants his number of reigns to go up. On a side note: I'm referring to world title reigns. What makes you think Triple H is gonna give up the title 12 more times?
|
|
warmachine76
Main Eventer
Big Sexy! I'm gonna kick your ass from here to Jacksonville!
Joined on: May 30, 2006 13:43:20 GMT -5
Posts: 1,032
|
Post by warmachine76 on Dec 6, 2008 12:44:04 GMT -5
This is a case of the pot calling the kettle black. Hogan and HHH are two of the biggest backstage politicians wrestling has ever known. So either one of them trash talking the other is laughable.
This is one of my problems with wrestling anymore. Entertainment and reality meshing together. Seriously does it really matter how many titles any pro wrestler wins? Or how long they keep the title at a time? Generally the strap is put on the most marketable person. Plain and simple because it is entertainment. I don't discount the effort and work it takes to be a pro wrestler. I sure the hell can't do what they do. On the other hand though they aren't going out on a nightly basis really trying to hurt each other to make a living. Like a boxer of a mixed martial artist.
I watch pro wrestling to escape reality and be entertained. Just like watching a movie or television show. I don't really care what they think of each other outside of the confines of televised events. I guess I don't understand why anyone else does either. If Hogan and Trips want to settle who the man is then they should hook it up for real.
|
|
|
Post by AndyPeck13 on Dec 6, 2008 13:03:09 GMT -5
I think I worked it out that out of the past 6 years (the time period Hogan mentions), Triple H has been World or WWE Champion for about 22 months. 22 months out of 72 is...roughly 31%. Last time I was in school, 31% was an epic fail. Really... when I did my A-Levels 12 years ago... 31% was a pass. i'm not sure what "A-Levels" are and i'm going to assume that you aren't from the US...so i'll try to explain.. for the most part in the US anything under a 70% is a failure.. except some college classes (mostly 4 credit ones) tend to extend "D" grades down to a 60% although i wouldn't called Triple H's run a fail, in this day and age holding the belt for 22 months out of 72 isn't something i'd consider a failure
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Dec 6, 2008 13:06:10 GMT -5
Really... when I did my A-Levels 12 years ago... 31% was a pass. i'm not sure what "A-Levels" are and i'm going to assume that you aren't from the US...so i'll try to explain.. for the most part in the US anything under a 70% is a failure.. except some college classes (mostly 4 credit ones) tend to extend "D" grades down to a 60% although i wouldn't called Triple H's run a fail, in this day and age holding the belt for 22 months out of 72 isn't something i'd consider a failure No, but Hogan's assessment of Triple H "holding the belt for the past 5 or 6 years" is.
|
|
|
Post by Slay on Dec 6, 2008 13:57:05 GMT -5
In the last year.... Cena has probably held it more times than HHH...
|
|
MRR
Main Eventer
The Mega Powers
Joined on: Jul 4, 2002 10:39:08 GMT -5
Posts: 2,547
|
Post by MRR on Dec 6, 2008 13:57:42 GMT -5
Good for Hogan, its about time he takes some return shots at the great Hunter.
|
|