I LIKE BIG BUTTS
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
5-1
Joined on: May 14, 2008 16:35:10 GMT -5
Posts: 2,557
|
Post by I LIKE BIG BUTTS on Dec 21, 2008 0:00:22 GMT -5
The Legends Title is dumb so which belt should TNA have added instead ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Bockwinkel on Dec 21, 2008 0:03:17 GMT -5
Hardcore, albeit under a different name
|
|
|
|
Post by fishzilla on Dec 21, 2008 0:05:06 GMT -5
HARDCORE. Shark boy would finally get his most deserved title reign.
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Dec 21, 2008 0:07:19 GMT -5
And the legends title is dumb?
Hardcore - How many "hardcore" wrestlers are in TNA? Mick Foley, Team 3D, Rhino and Abyss (use to). Sorry.. pass.
International - How many "international" guys are there? It would be just as dumb as the legends..
Six Man - Really?
X-Tag - Why? It's pointless there's no need in two tag team tites.
TV - Would only be defended on TV which is taped.. don't see the point.
Legends is fine they can always get rid of it later on by having another guy win it and "de-activate it".
|
|
|
|
Post by fdamage: Elite Trader on Dec 21, 2008 0:09:37 GMT -5
I voted TV but the Legends belt I think will function as such. Lets wait til the MEM storyline is done.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 13:41:03 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2008 12:53:57 GMT -5
Hardcore. Maybe throw in a twist, where Male and Female can go for it, leading to Roxxi's long title reign.
|
|
|
|
Post by thematthardyjr on Dec 21, 2008 13:17:05 GMT -5
Hardcore, I think it could add a new element to TNA where as a TV or IC wouldn't add much to the product.
|
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Dec 21, 2008 13:46:18 GMT -5
Try none. The X-division title should be the uppermidcard title, not a poor excuse for a cruiserweight title. The problem isnt a lack of titles, it is a lack of midcard progression into the main event scene. Noone should be arguing how Storm and Roode need an uppermidcard title when they've been uppermidcarders for years and should be main eventers by now. Same with Sabin, Shelley, and Daniels tbh. Oh but the division has a weight limit right? If TNA can repeatedly drop the ranking systems they put into place they can forget the weight limit storyline.
Also, the Legends title is extremely redundant considering the "Legends" already have the World title in their possession. Out of the multiple options TNA could've went with for a gimmick title, they chose one that has virtually no use at all... gotta love TNA.
|
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Dec 21, 2008 13:57:40 GMT -5
Also, the Legends title is extremely redundant considering the "Legends" already have the World title in their possession. Out of the multiple options TNA could've went with for a gimmick title, they chose one that has virtually no use at all... gotta love TNA. I don't really count the legends title as being a legitimate title in TNA, even though TNA says otherwise. It seems like the equivalent of Taz's FTW title back in ECW in terms of how much it means in the company. |
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Dec 21, 2008 14:11:16 GMT -5
I would have preferred that no new title have been debuted.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. McCluer on Dec 21, 2008 14:18:37 GMT -5
TV
|
|
Deep Shadows
Main Eventer
MXW 6 is here! https://youtu.be/LiDlNuiKmjA
Joined on: Jul 7, 2006 2:39:30 GMT -5
Posts: 3,504
|
Post by Deep Shadows on Dec 21, 2008 14:43:50 GMT -5
I voted TV but in second thought they don't need another title. They don't even use the X Division title how they should (or how they use to). To me it's lost all it's prestige and that's mainly because of TNA's poor booking.
Personally, I think the Legends title is fine. Plus, I don't really count it as being a real championship. It's like Ted DiBiase Million Dollar title or Taz' FTW belt back in ECW...it's just something Booker had made so he'll feel special, lol.
|
|
RBW
Main Eventer
There is no such thing as death: Life is only a dream and we are the imagination of ourselves
Joined on: Nov 24, 2004 17:36:15 GMT -5
Posts: 4,386
|
Post by RBW on Dec 21, 2008 14:47:49 GMT -5
They should have the Impact Title, which can be for Mid-Carders
|
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Dec 21, 2008 21:30:52 GMT -5
International, I guess. Either have their talent defend it in other promotions outside of their native land and somehow air the matches on Impact. Or have talents come in from outside the company and around the globe who challenge for the belt.
I really dunno what you had in mind, but that belt/division interests me most.
|
|
|
|
Post by pricelessted on Dec 21, 2008 21:45:51 GMT -5
I agree an Impact title would have made more sense. I don't really understand the Legends title. So if someone like Jimmy Rave were to win it, would he automatically become a legend?
|
|
|
|
Post by LAXxxx305 on Dec 21, 2008 22:14:30 GMT -5
None, TBH.
|
|
|
|
Post by XHW on Jan 1, 2009 15:25:56 GMT -5
Hardcore, TNA could have some extremely funny backstage moments with a Hardcore title, like having JB go for the title or Shane Sewell
|
|
Matthew Stovell
Main Eventer
Custom Muscle Mercenaries
Joined on: Jul 29, 2008 17:41:55 GMT -5
Posts: 2,099
|
Post by Matthew Stovell on Jan 1, 2009 16:43:33 GMT -5
Hardcore, TNA could have some extremely funny backstage moments with a Hardcore title, like having JB go for the title or Shane Sewell while that sounds entertaining, you'd get wwe fans saying it's copying the 24/7 Crash Holly matches. i don't mind the legends belt. i feel it'll help a member of the frontline - like Eric Young for example, to win it from Booker and it would establish them quickly to the audience |
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Jan 1, 2009 17:33:39 GMT -5
And the legends title is dumb? Hardcore - How many "hardcore" wrestlers are in TNA? Mick Foley, Team 3D, Rhino and Abyss (use to). Sorry.. pass. International - How many "international" guys are there? It would be just as dumb as the legends.. Six Man - Really? X-Tag - Why? It's pointless there's no need in two tag team tites. TV - Would only be defended on TV which is taped.. don't see the point. Legends is fine they can always get rid of it later on by having another guy win it and "de-activate it". De-activating the Legends title IS NOT a good idea, titles aren't a cheap thing. Even WWE only uses the real ones on TV, other than that the wrestlers have replicas. Does TNA even have that option? I'm not trying to pick a fight, just saying money wise getting rid of that title isn't a great idea. Which is also to say bringing it in wasn't that great of an idea to begin with. Personally I would say a United States or a title that isn't a gimmick is what TNA could've used. NEVER a hardcore title, I don't get why people think this is a belt that will help a company. They would throw it on Abyss and it would be back to gimmick hardcore matches again that got really old, really quick. |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Jan 1, 2009 17:45:51 GMT -5
And the legends title is dumb? Hardcore - How many "hardcore" wrestlers are in TNA? Mick Foley, Team 3D, Rhino and Abyss (use to). Sorry.. pass. International - How many "international" guys are there? It would be just as dumb as the legends.. Six Man - Really? X-Tag - Why? It's pointless there's no need in two tag team tites. TV - Would only be defended on TV which is taped.. don't see the point. Legends is fine they can always get rid of it later on by having another guy win it and "de-activate it". De-activating the Legends title IS NOT a good idea, titles aren't a cheap thing. Even WWE only uses the real ones on TV, other than that the wrestlers have replicas. Does TNA even have that option? I'm not trying to pick a fight, just saying money wise getting rid of that title isn't a great idea. Which is also to say bringing it in wasn't that great of an idea to begin with. Personally I would say a United States or a title that isn't a gimmick is what TNA could've used. NEVER a hardcore title, I don't get why people think this is a belt that will help a company. They would throw it on Abyss and it would be back to gimmick hardcore matches again that got really old, really quick. I'm not saying throw it in a garbage can.. put it in TNA HQ or something just take it off tv. |
|
