|
|
Post by LtD73 on Jan 10, 2009 9:16:10 GMT -5
I'll be updating this thread every week with the ratings of impact
January
1/1 - 1.0
1/8 - 1.1
1/15 - 1.2
1/22 - 1.1
1/29 - 1.2
February
2/5 - 1.1
2/12 - 1.2
2/19 - 1.3
2/26 - 1.3
March
3/5 - 1.3
3/12 - 1.2
3/19 - 1.3
3/26 - 1.3
April
4/2 - 1.3
4/9 - 1.3
4/16 - 1.3
4/23 - 1.2
4/30 - 1.2
May
5/7 - 1.2
5/14 - 1.2
5/21 - 1.1
5/28 - 1.2
June
6/4 - 1.1
6/11 - 1.1
6/18 - 1.2
6/25 - 1.1
July
7/2 - 1.2
7/9 - 1.2
7/16 - 1.1
7/23 - 1.3
7/30 - 1.3
August
8/6 - 1.2
8/13 - 1.1
8/20 -
8/27 -
|
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Jan 10, 2009 11:04:02 GMT -5
For TNA, good way to start off the year
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mac on Jan 10, 2009 11:52:53 GMT -5
good to start off the year
|
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Jan 10, 2009 20:14:27 GMT -5
This is good? I thought they were averaging a 1.2. I also though ECW was a low 2 and TNA a high 1.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 14:32:19 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2009 21:49:35 GMT -5
This place will erupt when TNA reaches 1.5 this year. Just a prediction though.
|
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Jan 17, 2009 11:07:05 GMT -5
1/15 has been added
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mac on Jan 17, 2009 11:22:53 GMT -5
1.2 sweet
|
|
newfrigginshow
Main Eventer
NFS
Joined on: Jul 13, 2006 8:23:46 GMT -5
Posts: 1,427
|
Post by newfrigginshow on Jan 17, 2009 13:21:21 GMT -5
Steady is good. I still have a hard time seeing them getting any higher without something to shake them up. I'd really prefer they be on Wed. night. Thursday is a huge night for TV's major networks.
|
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Jan 17, 2009 13:28:29 GMT -5
Itd be up against Lost, if impact was on wednesdays
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Jan 17, 2009 15:07:36 GMT -5
Wouldn't this be better to do in the official iMPACT thread? It makes more sense to put it there instead of having it floating in the board where it can be pushed down and also if you can't post the rating someone else can.
|
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Jan 17, 2009 15:40:36 GMT -5
not really ive added this thread to my favourites so i can keep track of where it is thanks anyway  |
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Jan 17, 2009 16:08:46 GMT -5
you should do two decimal places. Find that one on the net. Other wise we wont really know how good or bad they're doing. Ex. 1.15 is less than a 1.19
|
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Jan 17, 2009 17:31:48 GMT -5
At this rate, they'll have a 6.2 by next year!
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Jan 17, 2009 17:55:13 GMT -5
Funny thing about this week's rating - it had the highest viewers in TNA history. For "such a crappy show" it did pretty good in the ratings..
|
|
Deep Shadows
Main Eventer
MXW 6 is here! https://youtu.be/LiDlNuiKmjA
Joined on: Jul 7, 2006 2:39:30 GMT -5
Posts: 3,504
|
Post by Deep Shadows on Jan 17, 2009 18:04:24 GMT -5
They may not be killing it, but the ratings are steady. Good way to start off the year.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Jan 17, 2009 18:22:36 GMT -5
Funny thing about this week's rating - it had the highest viewers in TNA history. For "such a crappy show" it did pretty good in the ratings.. Like the ancient Romans used to say, "De gustibus non disputandum est." |
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Jan 24, 2009 7:45:31 GMT -5
1/22 has been added
|
|
warmachine76
Main Eventer
Big Sexy! I'm gonna kick your ass from here to Jacksonville!
Joined on: May 30, 2006 13:43:20 GMT -5
Posts: 1,032
|
Post by warmachine76 on Jan 24, 2009 10:29:26 GMT -5
Liam i've been meaning to tell you that I really like this thread. I think it was a good idea.
What I would like to see is a ratings breakdown for all of Spike's original programming. I would be willing to bet that TNA has the most consistent and possibly the best ratings on average of all their programs. The Ultimate Fighter does well but not much better than Impact. I really don't know the ratings numbers for their other programs. However I can't imagine that Manswers pulls better numbers than the UFC or TNA.
|
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Jan 24, 2009 13:11:58 GMT -5
"Liam i've been meaning to tell you that I really like this thread. I think it was a good idea."
Thanks dude
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Jan 24, 2009 14:00:33 GMT -5
See, this is what I don't understand. I don't understand why people complain about ratings - when they're constantly between 1.0 - 1.2. I can understand being worried if it's dropping to a 0.5 or something but they're constant ratings.  |
|
