|
Post by The Mac on Feb 15, 2009 14:17:11 GMT -5
what do you rate TNA right now overall as a Wrestling fed?
for storylines,wrestling & gimmicks ect.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 19:29:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2009 14:29:28 GMT -5
About a 7. It has its highs and lows but it still entertains me enough to keep watching.
|
|
WFK
Main Eventer
Leave The Memories Alone
Joined on: Oct 27, 2004 17:56:58 GMT -5
Posts: 4,632
|
Post by WFK on Feb 15, 2009 14:31:56 GMT -5
Around a 5. It's been really hit or miss lately.
|
|
|
Post by j2dacversion3 on Feb 15, 2009 14:37:08 GMT -5
Holding steady at a 3 for quite some time.
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Feb 15, 2009 14:54:54 GMT -5
5 sounds about right. The roster isn't nearly as great or unique as it used to be, though it shines compared to the god awful booking, and saves TNA from being a 1-3.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 19:29:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2009 14:58:51 GMT -5
around eight cause they have really fun matches
|
|
|
Post by XHW on Feb 15, 2009 20:38:23 GMT -5
8 b/c they have decent storylines and decent matches
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Feb 15, 2009 23:40:48 GMT -5
Why is ZERO not an option?
Honestly, a 2. They have great athletes and every show you pretty much get a killer match.....usually involving MCMGs, AJ or Angle.
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Feb 15, 2009 23:46:58 GMT -5
6. It's crap.
|
|
|
Post by thunderliger on Feb 16, 2009 0:21:32 GMT -5
I give it a modest 8. The wrestling is top notch but the storylines/gimmicks are horrid.
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Feb 16, 2009 1:02:16 GMT -5
Because I am not that mean I would give them a 6 which if a grade would be a D..
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Feb 16, 2009 1:05:12 GMT -5
8.
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Feb 16, 2009 3:48:29 GMT -5
Im actually liking TNA a lot, moreso than WWE. TNA has really caught onto me, i like what they are delivering.
|
|
|
Post by underdark78 on Feb 16, 2009 4:08:55 GMT -5
7.5.
|
|
Bozwell634™
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 27, 2007 0:11:21 GMT -5
Posts: 4,652
|
Post by Bozwell634™ on Feb 16, 2009 4:11:22 GMT -5
I went with a 7 this is just due to the fact that they do have some great stars and great potention to capitalise on the things that WWE are currently cutting out of their programs but they are focusing too much on bringing old WWE guys into the company, when they should be putting more things on using the X-Division but that is only my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Feb 16, 2009 4:57:36 GMT -5
No 0? I am so fed up with TNA that I dont' watch it anymore.
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Feb 16, 2009 5:08:07 GMT -5
No 0? I am so fed up with TNA that I dont' watch it anymore. I've heard that before. Just jokin' with ya man.
|
|
|
Post by underdark78 on Feb 16, 2009 6:34:14 GMT -5
No 0? I am so fed up with TNA that I dont' watch it anymore. If you dont watch it then how could you give it a rating?
|
|
|
Post by jeffhardy0101 on Feb 16, 2009 7:20:22 GMT -5
4 its got shitter since Kurt joined. And the storylines are terrible. BRING BACK DANIELS.
|
|
Arik Cannon
Main Eventer
Elite Trader
Joined on: Jul 25, 2005 0:47:44 GMT -5
Posts: 2,760
|
Post by Arik Cannon on Feb 16, 2009 9:26:34 GMT -5
I gave it a 4. I watch the show because the storylines are so stupid that I find it funny. I like watching guys like Joe, Styles, MCMG and Lethal wrestle even though TNA butchers them.
|
|