|
|
Post by LtD73 on Feb 16, 2009 22:09:09 GMT -5
HBK vs Taker at WM 25  ........if hbk wins next week |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 7:30:00 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2009 22:12:09 GMT -5
k use da raw thread sir
|
|
|
|
Post by stevensteinhauser on Feb 16, 2009 22:15:42 GMT -5
I'm making a mess I'm so happy!
|
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Feb 16, 2009 22:15:56 GMT -5
well when raw is over the wwe board will be full of OMG HBK/TAKER WM25 threads  |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Feb 16, 2009 22:16:48 GMT -5
I will laugh if JBL wins..
|
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Feb 16, 2009 22:24:53 GMT -5
I will laugh if JBL wins.. Me too actually lol, but JBL vs Taker would be such a slap in the face as we are so close to seeing HBK vs Taker |
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Feb 16, 2009 22:29:52 GMT -5
I will laugh if JBL wins.. Me too actually lol, but JBL vs Taker would be such a slap in the face as we are so close to seeing HBK vs Taker We were close a year ago, and no one's complaining about Edge-Taker, HBK-Flair... Plus JBL-Taker isn't horrible, or a Wrestlemania-repeat. I do, though, want HBK-Taker. |
|
|
|
Post by Barrett on Feb 16, 2009 22:32:24 GMT -5
Michaels faces 'Taker and I JIZZ IN MY PANTS!
|
|
|
|
Post by Ultimate Figure Collector on Feb 16, 2009 22:50:07 GMT -5
I will laugh if JBL wins.. WWE isn't that stupid. They know HBK/Taker is money unlike TNA who would completely do something like that. |
|
|
|
Post by j2dacversion3 on Feb 16, 2009 23:00:04 GMT -5
I will laugh if JBL wins.. WWE isn't that stupid. They know HBK/Taker is money unlike TNA who would completely do something like that. TNA would make it Undertaker vs. Shane Sewell. |
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Feb 16, 2009 23:02:10 GMT -5
WWE isn't that stupid. They know HBK/Taker is money unlike TNA who would completely do something like that. TNA would make it Undertaker vs. Shane Sewell. with Shawn Michaels on a pole |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Feb 16, 2009 23:12:06 GMT -5
Wow, how original - a reply of mine got turned into TNA.  |
|
|
|
Post by Ultimate Figure Collector on Feb 16, 2009 23:12:07 GMT -5
WWE isn't that stupid. They know HBK/Taker is money unlike TNA who would completely do something like that. TNA would make it Undertaker vs. Shane Sewell. Realistically TNA would have JBL beat Shawn Michaels but Taker would deny the match and the announcers would tell us like we are intellectually- disabled how it was to challenge the Undertaker it didn't mean he would accept it. |
|
|
|
Post by bazookajoe on Feb 16, 2009 23:16:20 GMT -5
Realistically TNA wouldn't have the brains put Shawn Michaels and Undertaker in such a match. Nor would they be able to hire any of the 3.
|
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Feb 16, 2009 23:37:30 GMT -5
Even though I wanna see HBK/Taker, I'd laugh if it got turned into a triple threat
|
|
