|
|
Post by voltage123 on Jun 23, 2007 4:11:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by comebackkid on Jun 23, 2007 4:25:38 GMT -5
Too bad they had to waste so many dream matches, book so many dq/run in finishes and rush dream matches to get there....
If booked correctly 1.2 could have been hit a year ago...
|
|
|
|
Post by wwemark1 on Jun 23, 2007 5:12:11 GMT -5
An iMPACT record? Yes.. This Is TNA got a 1.3
|
|
|
|
Post by voltage123 on Jun 23, 2007 5:26:57 GMT -5
That isn't Impact though.
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 23, 2007 8:01:09 GMT -5
well, at least it improvement. As I've stated, there prodcut has been much better
|
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Jun 23, 2007 9:53:08 GMT -5
An iMPACT record? Yes.. This Is TNA got a 1.3 Kind of sad when you consider that it was, for all intents and purposes, a clip show. |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Jun 23, 2007 12:53:55 GMT -5
well, at least it improvement. As I've stated, there prodcut has been much better The TNA product hasn't been anything better than decent since they were having weekly PPV's and then shortly after... |
|
|
|
Post by Liv Is Life on Jun 23, 2007 13:37:04 GMT -5
Actually, TNA has been spot on as of late, all of the Impacts have been very well done now for awhile..
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 23, 2007 13:51:34 GMT -5
well, at least it improvement. As I've stated, there prodcut has been much better The TNA product hasn't been anything better than decent since they were having weekly PPV's and then shortly after... sorry you feel that way, but i think most people that have consistahntly follwed the product and given their opiinions of it think otherwise. |
|
|
|
Post by Ultimate Figure Collector on Jun 23, 2007 14:33:50 GMT -5
The sad thing is Impact had 8 minutes of wrestling. Raven/Harris was legit 75 seconds LOL!! TNA! TNA! TNA!
|
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Jun 23, 2007 15:09:06 GMT -5
Well maybe people expected to see both three ways, not just the x-division one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Iron Man on Jun 23, 2007 15:10:55 GMT -5
Good to here it is slowly going up.
One more year form today and it will be 1.3
|
|
|
|
Post by sincityhero on Jun 23, 2007 19:08:47 GMT -5
lol
|
|
|
|
Post by rkolegendkilla on Jun 24, 2007 2:51:00 GMT -5
zomg 1.2!!!-;;;'
|
|
|
|
Post by American Phenom on Jun 24, 2007 2:54:37 GMT -5
The sad thing is Impact had 8 minutes of wrestling. Raven/Harris was legit 75 seconds LOL!! TNA! TNA! TNA! Nope. Chris Harris defeats Raven at 2:19 with the Catatonic after Kaz attacks Raven. Short, but a lot longer than 75 seconds. |
|
|
|
Post by Ultimate Figure Collector on Jun 24, 2007 3:21:13 GMT -5
The sad thing is Impact had 8 minutes of wrestling. Raven/Harris was legit 75 seconds LOL!! TNA! TNA! TNA! Nope. Chris Harris defeats Raven at 2:19 with the Catatonic after Kaz attacks Raven. Short, but a lot longer than 75 seconds. The report I read said it was a legit 75 seconds so I was going off that. Even so, the opener was like 3 minutes, that match was 2, and the main event was 7-8 but we really only seen 4-5 minutes of it so lets give TNA the benefit of a doubt and say it was 5 minutes. Thats 10 minutes of wrestling in a whole hour which means there was like 30 minutes of promos, and 20 minutes of commercials. I've heard TNA has like 45 minutes to work with and only 10 of that was wrestling? The other 35 was promos. Who edits this crap? |
|
|
|
Post by wwemark1 on Jun 24, 2007 5:01:17 GMT -5
Correction.. this is NOT their highest rating. It is for 2007 but they have reached a 1.2 in 2006.
PWInsider is reporting that the 6/21 Thursday edition of TNA iMPACT! drew a final 1.2 cable rating. This is the highest rating iMPACT! has received in the shows history on Spike TV. There are no details out right now regarding a share or an estimated audience yet.
TNA had previously drawn a 1.2 rating earlier this year on February 12 with its "This is TNA!" special. While the PWI report states this is the highest rated episode for iMPACT! on the network, Gerweck.net's excellent ratings record book shows that TNA also did a 1.2 rating back on May 25, 2006.
One good sign about this higher rating for TNA is that the show had reruns of CSI: Miami as a lead-in and that rerun episodes of The Ultimate Fighter aired afterwards, so this may help TNA's standing with Spike TV as the company continues TV negotiations for a new deal with the hope being that they can land a second hour. We hope to have additional details on the rating very soon.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Post by comebackkid on Jun 24, 2007 5:16:17 GMT -5
Raw A.M. Better utilizes its hour and has more wrestling condensing a 2 hr show.
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 24, 2007 8:07:01 GMT -5
Raw A.M. Better utilizes its hour and has more wrestling condensing a 2 hr show. They have that luxury becasue they are working originally with two hours. I wonder, like I said before if anyone at all who actually watches TNA can find one good thing about the product each week, if not I wonder why people keep watching it. I'm not talking about anyone in specific, but some people just come outta no where and bash away and you never here them say anything positive...I just wonder why bother watching if all you have is a negative thing to say...and I'm not refering to you Asia so dont flip your lid. |
|
|
|
Post by Ultimate Figure Collector on Jun 24, 2007 20:21:25 GMT -5
Raw A.M. Better utilizes its hour and has more wrestling condensing a 2 hr show. They have that luxury becasue they are working originally with two hours. I wonder, like I said before if anyone at all who actually watches TNA can find one good thing about the product each week, if not I wonder why people keep watching it. I'm not talking about anyone in specific, but some people just come outta no where and bash away and you never here them say anything positive...I just wonder why bother watching if all you have is a negative thing to say...and I'm not refering to you Asia so dont flip your lid. Well if you are reffering to me, 9 out of 10 times I DON'T watch Impact because I'm usually not home. |
|
