hurrimark
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 16, 2008 7:25:24 GMT -5
Posts: 1,588
|
Post by hurrimark on Feb 28, 2009 16:05:16 GMT -5
How long were the weekly PPV's between 2002-2004?
What was the best year for the weekly PPV's and why?
In general what were the length and quality of matches like?
Did they not show (cut to the crowd) certain things for e.g. people being put through tables or was this kind of stuff shown?
Thanks alot to anyone who can help with any of my questions.
|
|
I LIKE BIG BUTTS
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
5-1
Joined on: May 14, 2008 16:35:10 GMT -5
Posts: 2,557
|
Post by I LIKE BIG BUTTS on Feb 28, 2009 16:37:21 GMT -5
1. They were 2 hours.
2. This is a hard one. The X Division was at it's best in 2002 but the rest of the shows were not very good. Overall I like 2004 the best. I felt the shows overall were best then.
3. Good length for the most part and much longer than what we see on iMPACT!
4. They showed everything.
I really miss the weekly days overall. Sometimes on a Wed. night when there is nothing to do I will pop one in and watch it seeing as I own 99% of them all.
|
|
hurrimark
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 16, 2008 7:25:24 GMT -5
Posts: 1,588
|
Post by hurrimark on Feb 28, 2009 16:53:34 GMT -5
1. They were 2 hours. 2. This is a hard one. The X Division was at it's best in 2002 but the rest of the shows were not very good. Overall I like 2004 the best. I felt the shows overall were best then. 3. Good length for the most part and much longer than what we see on iMPACT! 4. They showed everything. I really miss the weekly days overall. Sometimes on a Wed. night when there is nothing to do I will pop one in and watch it seeing as I own 99% of them all. Thanks for your imput. Was 2003 like 2002, ie not very good shows besides the X division? |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Feb 28, 2009 16:55:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Feb 28, 2009 17:15:19 GMT -5
1. They were 2 hours. 2. This is a hard one. The X Division was at it's best in 2002 but the rest of the shows were not very good. Overall I like 2004 the best. I felt the shows overall were best then. 3. Good length for the most part and much longer than what we see on iMPACT! 4. They showed everything. I really miss the weekly days overall. Sometimes on a Wed. night when there is nothing to do I will pop one in and watch it seeing as I own 99% of them all. Thanks for your imput. Was 2003 like 2002, ie not very good shows besides the X division? 2004 just had better storylines going on. 2002-2003 I believe was pretty much TNA show casing they had the talent but not bringing it all together. |
|
hurrimark
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 16, 2008 7:25:24 GMT -5
Posts: 1,588
|
Post by hurrimark on Feb 28, 2009 17:17:21 GMT -5
Cheers, didn't know of this site until now. |
|
|
|
Post by DTP. on Feb 28, 2009 17:17:28 GMT -5
Weren't the very early shows an hour shows (aside from the opening June 19th 2002 show)
|
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Feb 28, 2009 17:40:08 GMT -5
Weren't the very early shows an hour shows (aside from the opening June 19th 2002 show) The weekly PPV were always 2 hrs on wed. I think you're thinking of those that aired on FSN. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 21:35:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2009 19:01:41 GMT -5
man ... i wish they had somewehre you could get the weekly ppv's on dvd
|
|
Judge Frollo
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Nov 5, 2008 19:10:01 GMT -5
Posts: 451 
|
Post by Judge Frollo on Mar 1, 2009 19:10:22 GMT -5
I own all of them, and I can say that January through September of 03 was very solid and a lot of fun. One thing that I always liked were the video packages at the beginning of the shows that Jeremy Borash put together. Things started to fall apart in quality shortly after Raven had his head shaved. AJ's reign would end, Dusty Rhodes got too involved in a lot of stuff, and the Raven/Mitchell feud got hurt by the lack of Douglas being involved in my opinion (he went on in search of "The New Franchise.")
|
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Mar 1, 2009 23:59:30 GMT -5
I own all of them, and I can say that January through September of 03 was very solid and a lot of fun. One thing that I always liked were the video packages at the beginning of the shows that Jeremy Borash put together. Things started to fall apart in quality shortly after Raven had his head shaved. AJ's reign would end, Dusty Rhodes got too involved in a lot of stuff, and the Raven/Mitchell feud got hurt by the lack of Douglas being involved in my opinion (he went on in search of "The New Franchise.") Michael Shane! Yeah buddy!! |
|
|
|
Post by The Silent Flute (joepetree) on Mar 2, 2009 1:34:59 GMT -5
man ... i wish they had somewehre you could get the weekly ppv's on dvd same here , but luckily they are puting them on TV For Free |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 21:35:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2009 2:19:19 GMT -5
man ... i wish they had somewehre you could get the weekly ppv's on dvd same here , but luckily they are puting them on TV For Free where did u hear that they were going to be on tv?? |
|
Steve Corino
Mid-Carder
The King of Old School
Joined on: Nov 18, 2006 15:00:41 GMT -5
Posts: 228
|
Post by Steve Corino on Mar 6, 2009 3:07:27 GMT -5
I think the poster is talking about the fact that TNA is supposed to be debuting a new show sometime this year called TNA Epix and it will feature matches from the weekly ppv days
|
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Mar 6, 2009 10:55:06 GMT -5
they really tried to give the best of their product in a night, because they wanted you to come back and purchase it the next week.
by far my favourite era of tna.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Mar 6, 2009 11:03:00 GMT -5
Yeah the fact that TNA was able to maintain a following willing to pay 10 bucks every week was outstanding... you got 4 shows for the price of 1 WWE Pay Per View and it was outstanding. I loved TNA back then. Then they bring in Johnny Fairplay and ran shows on FSN thus effectively removing themselves from Canadian viewing less you have a satellite.
|
|
