|
|
Post by Johnny Wrestling on Mar 10, 2009 20:05:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny on Mar 10, 2009 20:06:08 GMT -5
wow..
|
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy on Mar 10, 2009 20:07:14 GMT -5
i dare orton or punk or any of the other million guys covered in tattoos to get one of the scratch wwf logo.
|
|
|
|
Post by HugoOne on Mar 10, 2009 20:08:00 GMT -5
It makes sense. They're not allowed to get tattoos AFTER they have a developmental deal. WWE maintains their image because they're on television, so they should have to ask if what they're getting is permissible.
|
|
|
|
Post by machoking on Mar 10, 2009 20:08:52 GMT -5
I don't know why people are surprised.
It makes sense to me that performers would have to get tattoos authorized.
|
|
Sims
Main Eventer
It's kinda cool to be back on here after years away.
Joined on: Aug 21, 2006 17:58:49 GMT -5
Posts: 2,713
|
Post by Sims on Mar 10, 2009 20:13:11 GMT -5
I knew it I knew it. I always thought to myself that they had to get permission before doing that haha.
|
|
|
|
Post by futurewrestlemania on Mar 10, 2009 20:19:35 GMT -5
I agree that they should ask. Even if its unlikely but the tatoos might go against the character they are trying to portray. Know what I'm saying?
|
|
|
|
Post by "Vintage" HBK Still Rules on Mar 10, 2009 20:19:39 GMT -5
That's just silly......6262009:Swagger Original!'s sig says it all....
|
|
|
|
Post by JCF on Mar 10, 2009 20:24:47 GMT -5
Well it is right in a way. I mean it's WWE's say as to what they can/can't do since the person's under contract.
|
|
|
|
Post by axelwarjp on Mar 10, 2009 20:34:42 GMT -5
I guess I can understand this, I mean if they got tats all over without asking, it would cost WWE money on stuff, for example new figure designs
|
|
|
|
Post by ilol on Mar 10, 2009 21:14:04 GMT -5
I guess I can understand this, I mean if they got tats all over without asking, it would cost WWE money on stuff, for example new figure designs Yea but they were in developmental. |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Mar 10, 2009 21:21:00 GMT -5
I guess I can understand this, I mean if they got tats all over without asking, it would cost WWE money on stuff, for example new figure designs Yea but they were in developmental. ... Doesn't mean they aren't going to be brought up in the future at some point... this is like any other work place. You can't just go getting random crap tattooed everywhere and if you do at least have it covered. See MVP's tattoos. |
|
WFK
Main Eventer
Leave The Memories Alone
Joined on: Oct 27, 2004 17:56:58 GMT -5
Posts: 4,632
|
Post by WFK on Mar 10, 2009 21:23:37 GMT -5
I guess I can understand this, I mean if they got tats all over without asking, it would cost WWE money on stuff, for example new figure designs Of all the things the WWE could lose money over for tats figure designs is the big one? lmao. As much as I want to agree with the WWE on this one I can't. Tattoos are very personal and I don't think a company should be able to tell you what you can and can not get.  |
|
|
|
Post by ~*Young $ Money*~ on Mar 10, 2009 21:36:57 GMT -5
When you are signed to devolopmental you are signed based on your look and in ring work. If you change your look why can't you be fired? If a movie star is told he needs brown hair for a movie and then the day before they start filming it he dies it blonde they can fire him b/c its not the image they want so WWE can do the same only tattoos are not a removable thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by AdamBomb on Mar 10, 2009 22:15:05 GMT -5
Laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaame.
|
|
geroge86
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 21, 2005 12:38:13 GMT -5
Posts: 2,038
|
Post by geroge86 on Mar 10, 2009 22:36:13 GMT -5
When you are signed to devolopmental you are signed based on your look and in ring work. If you change your look why can't you be fired? If a movie star is told he needs brown hair for a movie and then the day before they start filming it he dies it blonde they can fire him b/c its not the image they want so WWE can do the same only tattoos are not a removable thing. agreed +1 you said it perfectly |
|
Bret_Hart_Mark™
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 5, 2005 13:34:12 GMT -5
Posts: 2,272
|
Post by Bret_Hart_Mark™ on Mar 10, 2009 22:36:42 GMT -5
I think you are all missing the point here.........WWE approved Orton to get those horrible sleeve tats? Wow.......just wow!
|
|
