|
Post by deskjet on Jul 23, 2007 10:45:33 GMT -5
I think it should go at least an hour, perhaps an iron man type match maybe with the match ending in a draw. BFG should be a last man standing match!
any other ideas?
|
|
|
Post by muleface on Jul 23, 2007 11:05:07 GMT -5
I think these too need to have a match in a 6 sided hell in a cell, its about timt TNA did one, and i'll be there so it would also be good for me!
OR, a Ladder Match wit all the belts hanging up there.
|
|
|
Post by wwemark1 on Jul 23, 2007 11:30:30 GMT -5
No, it doesn't need to go an hour. There is no point in it going an hour & then have a Last Man Standing at Bound For Glory. I think people are forgetting one thing... Bound For Glory is in OCTOBER. We still have No Surrender. They don't need to go an hour & still be able to make this go onto to the next ppv & then bound for glory. Plus, going an hour would take away all the hype for No Surrender/Bound For Glory IF they have a match.
Last Man Standing? Jesus Christ, NO! You don't need Joe/Angle in a Last Man Standing match. Normally Last Man Stand matches are brawling, using weapons, etc,etc,etc. They need to be able to wrestle. If they go out there & wrestle like they have before (on the mat, stiff shots, etc) then people would bitch about not getting their tables & it not brawling.
Hard Justice: Joe wins via submission iMPACT: Angle screw Joe out the tag titles iMPACT: Angle screws Joe out the X-Division title. No Surrender: Joe vs Angle Part 5 - Ends in DRAW. Bound For Glory: Joe vs Angle Part 6 - Ultimate Submission - Joe wins to end the fued.
|
|
|
Post by nascar on Jul 23, 2007 14:34:31 GMT -5
IDK but I figure that Joe walks out with the belts lol
|
|
|
Post by American Phenom on Jul 23, 2007 14:38:22 GMT -5
Angle will not be facing Joe at Bound for Glory. I can almost guarantee it.
It will be Angle vs. Sting at Bound for Glory. Title or not, I don't know.
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jul 23, 2007 15:01:13 GMT -5
i meant No surrender. I dont care as long as the feud ends well
|
|
|
Post by taker1 on Jul 23, 2007 15:06:33 GMT -5
No, it doesn't need to go an hour. There is no point in it going an hour & then have a Last Man Standing at Bound For Glory. I think people are forgetting one thing... Bound For Glory is in OCTOBER. We still have No Surrender. They don't need to go an hour & still be able to make this go onto to the next ppv & then bound for glory. Plus, going an hour would take away all the hype for No Surrender/Bound For Glory IF they have a match. Last Man Standing? Jesus Christ, NO! You don't need Joe/Angle in a Last Man Standing match. Normally Last Man Stand matches are brawling, using weapons, etc,etc,etc. They need to be able to wrestle. If they go out there & wrestle like they have before (on the mat, stiff shots, etc) then people would bitch about not getting their tables & it not brawling. Hard Justice: Joe wins via submission iMPACT: Angle screw Joe out the tag titles iMPACT: Angle screws Joe out the X-Division title. No Surrender: Joe vs Angle Part 5 - Ends in DRAW. Bound For Glory: Joe vs Angle Part 6 - Ultimate Submission - Joe wins to end the fued. Having Joe & Angle wrestle 6 PPV matches in the span of a year is absolutely intellectually- disabled. Talk about overkill.
|
|
|
Post by American Phenom on Jul 23, 2007 18:00:08 GMT -5
Bound for Glory 2005: Everyone was so sure that Monty Brown would win the title.
Bound for Glory 2006: Everyone was so sure that Samoa Joe would win the title.
I'm willing to bet money that Samoa Joe vs. Kurt Angle will not main event Bound for Glory 2007.
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Jul 23, 2007 18:07:16 GMT -5
I see Joe winning at Hard Justice, which leads to him losing all but World Title between then and BFG, at No Surrender Joe possibly faces Angle for World Title, Angle loses, Angle sets up a feud with Sting and Joe sets up a feud with someone leading To Joe vs. whoever for World title and Angle vs. Sting at BFG.
|
|
|
Post by The Undertaker on Jul 23, 2007 19:42:14 GMT -5
Bound for Glory 2005: Everyone was so sure that Monty Brown would win the title. Bound for Glory 2006: Everyone was so sure that Samoa Joe would win the title. I'm willing to bet money that Samoa Joe vs. Kurt Angle will not main event Bound for Glory 2007. ok Mr. TNA.
|
|
|
Post by chumped on Jul 23, 2007 19:47:32 GMT -5
Bound for Glory 2005: Everyone was so sure that Monty Brown would win the title. Bound for Glory 2006: Everyone was so sure that Samoa Joe would win the title. I'm willing to bet money that Samoa Joe vs. Kurt Angle will not main event Bound for Glory 2007. ok Mr. TNA. The point of that was? Anyway, I just want to see a GOOD match from these 2 for once....You would think that 2 of the best in the world could put on an entertaining match, but it remains to be seen thus far.
|
|
|
Post by American Phenom on Jul 23, 2007 21:45:21 GMT -5
Bound for Glory 2005: Everyone was so sure that Monty Brown would win the title. Bound for Glory 2006: Everyone was so sure that Samoa Joe would win the title. I'm willing to bet money that Samoa Joe vs. Kurt Angle will not main event Bound for Glory 2007. ok Mr. TNA. Take Vince McMahon's penis out of your mouth, I can't understand you.
|
|
|
Post by Ultimate Figure Collector on Jul 24, 2007 0:22:20 GMT -5
Honestly I don't care what Joe/Angle 4 is like. It'll probably be a disappointment just like the others. The whole all the titles on the line in this match couldn't make it any less interesting. Only in TNA could you take a Joe/Angle match and make it uninteresting.
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jul 24, 2007 0:24:24 GMT -5
Honestly I don't care what Joe/Angle 4 is like. It'll probably be a disappointment just like the others. The whole all the titles on the line in this match couldn't make it any less interesting. Only in TNA could you take a Joe/Angle match and make it uninteresting. nice to see you have an open mind about it
|
|
|
Post by wwemark1 on Jul 24, 2007 0:27:34 GMT -5
I don't see what the problem with the other 3 matches was. I liked all 3 of them & I look forward to this one.
|
|
|
Post by Ultimate Figure Collector on Jul 24, 2007 0:35:33 GMT -5
Honestly I don't care what Joe/Angle 4 is like. It'll probably be a disappointment just like the others. The whole all the titles on the line in this match couldn't make it any less interesting. Only in TNA could you take a Joe/Angle match and make it uninteresting. nice to see you have an open mind about it Why should I? The first 3 matches they had were average at best. Everything is TNA is rushed, rushed, rushed.
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jul 24, 2007 1:11:13 GMT -5
nice to see you have an open mind about it Why should I? The first 3 matches they had were average at best. Everything is TNA is rushed, rushed, rushed. well, what do you want in an hour long show? And just becasue there previous matches werent great doenst mean this one has to be bad
|
|
|
Post by Ultimate Figure Collector on Jul 24, 2007 1:36:09 GMT -5
Why should I? The first 3 matches they had were average at best. Everything is TNA is rushed, rushed, rushed. well, what do you want in an hour long show? And just becasue there previous matches werent great doenst mean this one has to be bad I'm not talking about Impact. I'm talking about feuds in general. Angle/Joe did not need to be done the second Angle came into TNA. You build that up and save that match for another time. Angle wasn't even that heathly at the time but TNA just had to do it right then and there. This match doesn't interest me because Joe probably isn't going over and I'm tired of Joe being Angle's bitch and secondly all the titles on the line makes it less appealing. How can the tag titles be defended in a singles match? Why is Angle wrestling for the X-Division Title? It might not be about weight limits but that still doesn't mean it makes sense when ya know, Daniels is the number one contender.
|
|
Too Sweet
Main Eventer
R.I.P MJ
Joined on: Sept 20, 2006 23:28:07 GMT -5
Posts: 3,611
|
Post by Too Sweet on Jul 24, 2007 1:48:22 GMT -5
What I'd like to see
- Hard Justice: Joe Wins the World Heavyweight Championship - Impact!: Angle talks trash about Joe, and Leads Joe into having a Tag-Team Championship match against the Murder City Machine Guns next week at Impact! - Impact!: Angle Interferes the match and the Murder City Machine Guns win the Tag-Team Championships and On the Same night Christopher Daniels challenges Joe for the X Division Championship at No Surrender - No Surrender: As the match takes place Between Daniels and Joe, Angle comes out to watch the match while XXX are also watching the match, Angle interferes with the Referee as XXX comes out and beats on Joe, Skipper Leg Drops Joe, Daniels lands the BME on Joe and Senshi hits the Warriors way, Daniels wins the X Division Title and Joe is furious at both XXX and for Angle interfering. - Impact! to BFG: Trash Talking, perhaps a 4-Way for the World Title at BFG between Joe, Angle, Christian Cage and AJ Styles. - BFG: Christian Cage wins the World Title by Screwing over AJ Styles, Angle and Joe are still Fighting after the match.
Thats what I would like to see, and I think it would turn out pretty good if they did this
|
|
|
Post by Ultimate Figure Collector on Jul 24, 2007 2:10:01 GMT -5
Yeah lets put the title one Joe and then take it right off him. That'll make Joe wanna stay with TNA!
|
|