|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 11, 2009 5:28:08 GMT -5
TNA has the possibility of gaining an influx of talent and beneficial talent as well. Do you think its time for them to get another show or at least another hour on tv?
Personally I'd like to see them do another 1 hour show perhps dedicated to the younger talent. Whatta ya think?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mac on Jun 11, 2009 6:07:20 GMT -5
I think they should stick to what they got and still have loads of young talent in action!
|
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Jun 11, 2009 6:07:36 GMT -5
Another show - Epics
A 3rd hour didnt work for WCW and doesnt work for WWE
|
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Jun 11, 2009 11:42:13 GMT -5
Another show for the younger talent? Why not... isolate the unknown guys even more to make room for the WWE refugees. Sounds great.
|
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Jun 11, 2009 11:51:58 GMT -5
yes.
tna should also be trying to be more cutting edge ala wwe attitude era. that's the market their aiming for seemingly, atleast.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy on Jun 11, 2009 11:54:27 GMT -5
I say they should try for a live, one hour show on Sunday's, like Heat was to the WWF in 1998. It would be useful for promoting the PPV's as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by machoking on Jun 11, 2009 11:59:32 GMT -5
TNA can't handle the booking of one show, why would that be warrant for another?
|
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Jun 11, 2009 12:14:17 GMT -5
I say they should try for a live, one hour show on Sunday's, like Heat was to the WWF in 1998. It would be useful for promoting the PPV's as well. jimmy suggest a dark match/jobber show? who would've thought? |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jun 11, 2009 12:45:19 GMT -5
I'm still trying to figure out Spike won't let them stop doing the iMPACT replays (9Am Sat. morning) and bring back a one hour Sat. morning wrestling show followed by a "Road to PPV Special" the day before a PPV.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thick Justice on Jun 11, 2009 13:47:26 GMT -5
I'd love too see 2 more hours on. Preferrably a wednesday.
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 11, 2009 14:02:12 GMT -5
TNA can't handle the booking of one show, why would that be warrant for another? perhaps that's the problem  |
|
|
|
Post by XHW on Jun 11, 2009 14:11:09 GMT -5
I say yes b/c they need to grow
|
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Jun 11, 2009 20:42:39 GMT -5
TNA can't handle the booking of one show, why would that be warrant for another? perhaps that's the problem Perhaps the problem is TNA buys talent like a fat kid buys pastry... |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 11, 2009 20:45:21 GMT -5
perhaps that's the problem Perhaps the problem is TNA buys talent like a fat kid buys pastry... So, and WWE doesnt? |
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Jun 11, 2009 22:17:31 GMT -5
No expansion. If they're destined to win this war, let them do it by atrition.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lita's Lover on Jun 14, 2009 17:00:00 GMT -5
TNA should just focus on wrestling, they have more guys then WWE who can go. If they do get another show on a different day or night, have it be STICTLY matches! No story lines or angles, leave that for impact
|
|
|
|
Post by legionofsemidoom on Jun 14, 2009 17:33:21 GMT -5
Should they...yes
Will they....no
|
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Jun 14, 2009 21:52:05 GMT -5
TNA should just focus on wrestling, they have more guys then WWE who can go. If they do get another show on a different day or night, have it be STICTLY matches! No story lines or angles, leave that for impact that would be great for wrestling fans, but would it overall sell? i don't really think so. |
|
MattPenrose13
Main Eventer
6 UK Refs
Joined on: Jul 3, 2007 12:51:48 GMT -5
Posts: 1,278
|
Post by MattPenrose13 on Jun 15, 2009 11:46:26 GMT -5
I say they should try for a live, one hour show on Sunday's, like Heat was to the WWF in 1998. It would be useful for promoting the PPV's as well. Thankyou sir |
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Jun 15, 2009 11:58:11 GMT -5
They should knock impact down to an hour again and then get another show later in the week and both be aired live.
|
|
