|
|
Post by Lewscher on Jun 11, 2009 15:01:51 GMT -5
wots wrong with TNA that when ever i come here ther is always a "who wwe should come to tna" thread  this  ing pisses me off !!!!! i mean i watch tna for the up and coming superstars of tomorrow and the not to close future....... if i want wwe superstars id watch wwe but i dont !! i hate wwe since like 05 reli..... and since its been like HD its even worse man... some dudes understandable..... at first i was mega against angle but he was ok after a while as he did a lil' something for the company but foley?? hell no.... so why do you want all these wwe rejects and jobbers in tna..... |
|
|
|
Post by White Trash Lucha on Jun 11, 2009 15:06:24 GMT -5
Well Kennedy and Umaga would Be Great Additions to TNA in my Eyes.
Both are Still young enough and Are overall Good Wrestlers.
With Rey I See them if they bring him in as a high Midcarder and It would Really draw alot of Attraction to TNA because he is a Big name in Wrestling.
I dont Mind Umaga and Kennedy but I rather not have Mysterio in.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy on Jun 11, 2009 15:10:27 GMT -5
Bigger names = more attention to TNA.
It's that simple.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 28, 2024 16:34:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2009 15:28:52 GMT -5
Bigger names = more attention to TNA. It's that simple. That's the truth. The more big names on the card, the more buy rates/ratings. Also, lewscher, could you please just use proper grammar for once. Reading your posts give me headaches. |
|
Judge Frollo
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Nov 5, 2008 19:10:01 GMT -5
Posts: 451 
|
Post by Judge Frollo on Jun 11, 2009 16:16:58 GMT -5
Because Sting and Angle have clearly proven that bigger names in TNA = bigger ratings.
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan17: The Total Package on Jun 11, 2009 16:18:11 GMT -5
Bigger names = more attention to TNA. It's that simple. That's the truth. The more big names on the card, the more buy rates/ratings. Also, lewscher, could you please just use proper grammar for once. Reading your posts give me headaches. Well technically, Kennedy & Umaga would be making a "return" to TNA wrestling as they both have wrestled there before. I personally think they would be good for the product Mysterio I'm 50/50 with. I feel he could do a lot with TNA (ratings, merchandise etc.) But everyone has their opinion. |
|
|
|
Post by XHW on Jun 11, 2009 18:18:10 GMT -5
Bigger names = more attention to TNA. It's that simple. Bingo, if there is a chance to get better talent they will |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 11, 2009 18:59:45 GMT -5
get over it. So ur tellin me that if the Kobe bryant left the Lakers that other teams wouldnt try to pick him up? OMFGSZSSD SEWDDEW they're copying!
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hammers on Jun 11, 2009 19:04:59 GMT -5
Foley is hardly a wwe reject. by that way of thinking, Sting shouldn't be in TNA as he's a WCW reject. If TNA's roster didn't consist of people who have at one time worked for a major promotion it would be very small and as sound as those few workers are, there's no way they'd get the ratings they are getting.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Jun 11, 2009 19:05:09 GMT -5
Bigger names = more attention to TNA. It's that simple. Bingo, if there is a chance to get better talent they will Are you saying TNA's talent isn't good? Because TNA already has guys that are much better than Kennedy or Umaga. |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 11, 2009 19:34:30 GMT -5
TNA's problem is not paralleing their home talent with WWE talent, but i think they are finally starting to do that
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 28, 2024 16:34:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2009 21:16:55 GMT -5
get over it. So ur tellin me that if the Kobe bryant left the Lakers that other teams wouldnt try to pick him up? OMFGSZSSD SEWDDEW they're copying! That's a very good point. If a big star leaves, of course another promotion is gonna pick him up. It's smart business. |
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Jun 11, 2009 21:25:52 GMT -5
get over it. So ur tellin me that if the Kobe bryant left the Lakers that other teams wouldnt try to pick him up? OMFGSZSSD SEWDDEW they're copying! NBA is one organization. Your Kobe scenario is more analagous to Edge quitting Smackdown and going to RAW. If anyone thinks Foley, Sting, and Angle are just the foundation for guys like Umaga and Kennedy to come along and put TNA's ratings over the top... I laugh. |
|
|
|
Post by Slay on Jun 11, 2009 21:28:25 GMT -5
TNA is lucky WWE is around, or else they wouldn't have a roster.
|
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Jun 11, 2009 21:45:49 GMT -5
wots wrong with TNA that when ever i come here ther is always a "who wwe should come to tna" thread this ing pisses me off !!!!! i mean i watch tna for the up and coming superstars of tomorrow and the not to close future....... if i want wwe superstars id watch wwe but i dont !! i hate wwe since like 05 reli..... and since its been like HD its even worse man... some dudes understandable..... at first i was mega against angle but he was ok after a while as he did a lil' sumink for the company but foley?? hell no.... so why do you want all these wwe rejects and jobbers in tna..... 1. Learn to spell 2. Seriously, if you expect anyone to take your subject seriously, have some sort of understanding that putting a huge long word in your subject is annoying. 3. what in the blue hell is a sumink? |
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Jun 12, 2009 0:10:14 GMT -5
foley in tna went from a good move to destroying a lotta the worth of foley's name.
|
|
BIGticket5
Main Eventer
add me: www.myspace/rostafer_23
Joined on: Jan 26, 2002 20:01:11 GMT -5
Posts: 1,745
|
Post by BIGticket5 on Jun 12, 2009 4:28:46 GMT -5
Bigger names = more attention to TNA. It's that simple. That's the truth. The more big names on the card, the more buy rates/ratings. quote] plus, people like to think about the exciting fueds it could produce. daniels, aj, sabin, shelley, lethal, suicide v. rey matt morgan or abyss v. rey joe or abyss v. umaga angle, sting, jarrett v. kennedy |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 28, 2024 16:34:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2009 9:14:00 GMT -5
Bigger names = more attention to TNA. It's that simple. That's the truth. The more big names on the card, the more buy rates/ratings. quote] plus, people like to think about the exciting fueds it could produce. daniels, aj, sabin, shelley, lethal, suicide v. rey matt morgan or abyss v. rey joe or abyss v. umaga angle, sting, jarrett v. kennedy Yes. If you put Lethal with Rey, Lethal will gain more popularity. Same with anyone else you put with a popular opponent. |
|
Hedgehulk
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 12, 2003 15:41:42 GMT -5
Posts: 1,856
|
Post by Hedgehulk on Jun 12, 2009 10:17:25 GMT -5
Bigger names = more attention to TNA. It's that simple. That's what WCW thought and look what happened to them! |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 28, 2024 16:34:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2009 10:39:01 GMT -5
Bigger names = more attention to TNA. It's that simple. That's what WCW thought and look what happened to them! That didn't kill WCW though. WCW died because Turner Broadcasting didn't want their shows on their networks. |
|
