|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jun 20, 2009 16:29:47 GMT -5
The 2009 edition of TNA Bound For Glory will be held on October 18th at the University Of California's Bren Events Center in Irvine (part of Orange County). Irvine is a short drive from Anaheim and Los Angeles.
PWInsider.com
WTF is that crap? That is the dumbest location possible. Why not go somewhere you know you can draw (New York, Atlanta, Boston, etc) instead of making this stupid descion of running somewhere you didn't draw that good of your first time there.
|
|
|
|
Post by White Trash Lucha on Jun 20, 2009 16:32:39 GMT -5
Wow...
|
|
|
|
Post by the franchise on Jun 20, 2009 16:57:35 GMT -5
I don't really think TNA can draw anywhere.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lewscher on Jun 20, 2009 16:59:03 GMT -5
omfg!!
what a crapdecision....
but that is TNA for you lol.... sadly i still love em XD
|
|
|
|
Post by White Trash Lucha on Jun 20, 2009 17:01:48 GMT -5
Heres a Pic  |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 28, 2024 18:52:52 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2009 17:14:15 GMT -5
I don't really think TNA can draw anywhere. They can draw in: St. Louis New York Atlanta Boston England Canada Seriously, this is a dumb move on TNA's part. I think New York would've been a better place to have it. I would've loved to see a TNA PPV at the Manhattan Center. |
|
|
|
Post by Patrick Bateman on Jun 20, 2009 17:23:59 GMT -5
IRVINE?! OMG JERICHO~!
|
|
|
|
Post by XHW on Jun 20, 2009 17:28:12 GMT -5
really? wow, not a great choice imo
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 28, 2024 18:52:52 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2009 17:31:50 GMT -5
WOW, wtf. I was sure we'd get it.  |
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy on Jun 20, 2009 17:42:35 GMT -5
lol wut
|
|
hbkrules
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
Joined on: Jun 18, 2002 11:49:32 GMT -5
Posts: 2,116
|
Post by hbkrules on Jun 20, 2009 18:15:11 GMT -5
should have been dayton ohio....
|
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Jun 20, 2009 18:30:10 GMT -5
You're all just pissed because you can't go to it. TNA needs to expand west to grow, how is that a hard thing to understand and a bad idea?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mac on Jun 20, 2009 18:44:30 GMT -5
holy moly...
|
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jun 20, 2009 18:52:10 GMT -5
You're all just pissed because you can't go to it. TNA needs to expand west to grow, how is that a hard thing to understand and a bad idea? Oh yeah, I'm just soooo furious that I can't go to it. Seriously, that's a stuid thing to say. I'm not mad because I can't go since I've already got three TNA live events coming up before October even gets here and have no problem with TNA "expanding" but to go to California where you've already had two or so shows there they only drew 700-1,000 people and take a big PPV is very stuid. Texas, New York, Boston - all three of those choices I couldn't have went to and at least it would make sense. Just because we think it's a stupid descision to take BFG there you're third or so time out doesn't mean we're just mad because we can't go. |
|
|
|
Post by McBlake on Jun 20, 2009 19:37:18 GMT -5
Urgh JBL is poopy quotes AGAIN??
|
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Jun 20, 2009 19:47:56 GMT -5
Not the best idea IMO but oh well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Jun 20, 2009 19:57:53 GMT -5
You're all just pissed because you can't go to it. TNA needs to expand west to grow, how is that a hard thing to understand and a bad idea? Oh yeah, I'm just soooo furious that I can't go to it. Seriously, that's a stuid thing to say. I'm not mad because I can't go since I've already got three TNA live events coming up before October even gets here and have no problem with TNA "expanding" but to go to California where you've already had two or so shows there they only drew 700-1,000 people and take a big PPV is very stuid. Texas, New York, Boston - all three of those choices I couldn't have went to and at least it would make sense. Just because we think it's a stupid descision to take BFG there you're third or so time out doesn't mean we're just mad because we can't go. It's not the WORST place they could go though. Their run in the northwest was a disaster all together. The shows had 600 or less with most of those comped. TNA is probably trying to see if they take a PPV out there, maybe it will draw more. What does TNA have to lose? Money? They already lost a lot of that. |
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Jun 20, 2009 23:53:03 GMT -5
TNA always does this...they pick a small arena awfully close to a major city, then they mention the major city in their advertising.
"TNA's Biggest PPV of the year is coming to the Los Angeles Area!"
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan17: The Total Package on Jun 21, 2009 9:19:50 GMT -5
Man. I think they could've picked a better place but, oh well. Do you think it was worse to try and draw there or the Palace Theater?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 28, 2024 18:52:52 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2009 10:37:28 GMT -5
TNA always does this...they pick a small arena awfully close to a major city, then they mention the major city in their advertising. "TNA's Biggest PPV of the year is coming to the Los Angeles Area!" Exactly. Last year in fact: "TNA's Biggest PPV of the year is coming to Chicago!" Hoffman Estates. REALLY? You could've went to the  ing UIC Pavilion and gotten 5,000-7,000 because they can change the seating for it. Not to mention it's in CHICAGO. THE CITY. Not a suburb that hosts a barely known Lingerie Football team. |
|
