|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Jul 8, 2009 22:52:16 GMT -5
So I finally check out the official page of Kennedy and see a lot of comments about how he possibly is going to TNA and such and such, I start to recognize some of the screen names being used and realize that there are many of those who seemingly make comments about how TNA uses their current roster.
So let me get this straight, they want another WWE future Endeavored club member in TNA and yet they also complain that TNA doesn't home grow talent enough...cause somehow adding Kennedy to the equation will equal more PPV buys and better use of the current roster..or will be just end up feuding with other former WWE guys and eventually get misused or job out other potential home grown talent?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 28, 2024 20:43:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2009 22:55:45 GMT -5
I don't think Kennedy will be a saving grace for TNA, or even a huge draw. I'd just like to see him in the promotion, personally. Haha.
- Triple S
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jul 8, 2009 23:07:38 GMT -5
Kennedy's still young enough (33) for TNA to kinda shy away from what he was in the WWE and make him "their own". Sort of what I feel like they're doing with Morgan. Kennedy can wrestle, talk, and has the power (imo) to make TNA money. No, ratings won't shoot to 3.0 or 10.0 but he's got the "it" factor that would add more to TNA. Ken's one of those "fomer WWE guys" that TNA should get. The kind that aren't over the hill and washed up (Scotty, Kevin, Sting, etc) and can still go (Angle, Booker, Morgan, etc). He's very entertaining aswell, as long as he's not restrained (see his videos on facebook).
So, why? Because he's freaking awesome and fits.
|
|
|
Post by shadyinc on Jul 8, 2009 23:07:58 GMT -5
I think Kennedy would do good things in TNA, maybe not be a saving grace or whatnot but Id definately like to see him in TNA.
|
|
|
Post by McBlake on Jul 9, 2009 0:33:38 GMT -5
They SURLEY wouldn't put him in the main event spot, he's not a high flyer, he's not a legend, he's not a she, and no one would really be a good partner with him. What does he do
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jul 9, 2009 2:08:47 GMT -5
They SURLEY wouldn't put him in the main event spot, he's not a high flyer, he's not a legend, he's not a she, and no one would really be a good partner with him. What does he do Why wouldn't they put him in the main event? With the rumor of Sting retiring at the end of the ear & Angle's contract coming up. He would fit in place.
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jul 9, 2009 7:20:36 GMT -5
Well TNA defiantely needs to trim some fat b4 they bring in other guys/ I mean let's start movin guys like the MEM out and bring in kennedy, Umaga, lashley. Too many of these wwe guys is gonna push the talent down again and then it'll be wwe lite again. I know mem is hot now but i think it needs a shelf life for when its done before it suffers the same fate as the nwo.
|
|
|
Post by XHW on Jul 9, 2009 8:26:17 GMT -5
I think he would be a guy they will have for 3-7 years depending, and he can be in the main event if needed, he can feud with some top talent and he is just a very good wrestler imo
|
|
|
Post by mnm213 on Jul 9, 2009 10:15:21 GMT -5
The difference is, Kennedy is not a "has-been" like many of the TNA main eventers. Infact, he was a "never was", so thats why many of us want to see him in TNA. He could be the biggest draw if they let him be himself (Early WWE Run) and don't limit his character or moveset. Plus, I'm imagining he could pull off the Green Bay Plunge often there, cause theres many small wrestlers - Styles, Daniels, Suicide, Lethal, Sabin, Shelley, etc.
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jul 9, 2009 12:10:09 GMT -5
He stopped doing the Green Bay Plunge because it would hurt him when performing it. Not because there wasn't any small guys.
|
|
Drdoom
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 10, 2006 12:29:28 GMT -5
Posts: 3,516
|
Post by Drdoom on Jul 9, 2009 15:18:26 GMT -5
Kennedy needs to be brought in to take on Angle or Heel Foley still acting as commisioner.
Austin/Mcmahon needs to be reborn and Kennedy can pull it off.
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Jul 9, 2009 15:34:45 GMT -5
The difference is, Kennedy is not a "has-been" like many of the TNA main eventers. Infact, he was a "never was" He wasn't a "never was." He was beating main eventers left and right on Smackdown once upon a time. That's why it'll be typical when some of you cry TNA's praises that they let him be himself, and show his full potential, when he wouldn't even have been a blip on the radar had it not been for WWE and the bit of fame they gave him. So when Kennedy is given the TNA title... don't thank Jarrett or Dixie, thank Vinny Mac.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Jul 9, 2009 15:42:54 GMT -5
If TNA uses Kennedy right then I would definitely consider watching TNA again as next to Johnny Devine, Ken Kennedy is my favorite wrestler.
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Jul 9, 2009 15:44:27 GMT -5
I just wish he'd stay away from wrestling all together. I don't wanna see him in TNA at all.
|
|
|
Post by laythvandam on Jul 9, 2009 16:01:04 GMT -5
I don't want to see him anywhere near there, he isn't good enough in the ring and his one trick pony act got stale after 2 weeks.
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Jul 9, 2009 16:42:09 GMT -5
This would be a good move for TNA. Kennedy is very strong on the mic. Lots of things they can do with him.
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Jul 10, 2009 10:57:55 GMT -5
i don't think he'd do much of anything. i'm not very interested in him being in tna
|
|
|
Post by lewpacnitdontstop on Jul 10, 2009 12:02:48 GMT -5
Kennedy's still young enough (33) for TNA to kinda shy away from what he was in the WWE and make him "their own". Sort of what I feel like they're doing with Morgan. Kennedy can wrestle, talk, and has the power (imo) to make TNA money. No, ratings won't shoot to 3.0 or 10.0 but he's got the "it" factor that would add more to TNA. Ken's one of those "fomer WWE guys" that TNA should get. The kind that aren't over the hill and washed up (Scotty, Kevin, Sting, etc) and can still go (Angle, Booker, Morgan, etc). He's very entertaining aswell, as long as he's not restrained (see his videos on facebook). So, why? Because he's freaking awesome and fits. Exactly.
|
|
DB
Main Eventer
Only human
Joined on: Apr 25, 2009 11:14:07 GMT -5
Posts: 1,829
|
Post by DB on Jul 13, 2009 19:05:12 GMT -5
i think with kennedys mic skills and stuff like that.i think he would try to get into the MEM's busness and try to get them going and start a fued.
|
|
MR._SOCKO
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 2, 2002 11:08:22 GMT -5
Posts: 4,268
|
Post by MR._SOCKO on Jul 15, 2009 10:45:21 GMT -5
I think Kennedy and Umaga would both be good fits. Yeah, they are former WWE talents but they both still young and can contribute a lot. Guys like Steiner, Nash, Booker, Billy Gunn, etc. aren't really what TNA needs right now. Umaga vs. Joe and Kennedy vs. Jarrett would both be solid ppv main events.
|
|