starpower
Main Eventer
18 Refs and Climbing
Joined on: Dec 14, 2006 21:01:22 GMT -5
Posts: 1,045
|
Post by starpower on Apr 2, 2009 16:19:33 GMT -5
who had a Better overall Career i say Bret
|
|
J.Freek
Main Eventer
Best in the World
Joined on: Dec 8, 2007 18:22:57 GMT -5
Posts: 2,870
|
Post by J.Freek on Jul 8, 2009 13:12:36 GMT -5
I'd have to say The Hitman
|
|
Ross
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 21, 2008 9:43:29 GMT -5
Posts: 3,154
|
Post by Ross on Jul 8, 2009 13:29:33 GMT -5
I have to say Brett
|
|
|
|
Post by instant classic on Jul 8, 2009 13:42:32 GMT -5
Bret Hart.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jul 5, 2024 20:07:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2009 13:56:32 GMT -5
Bret Hart
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. McCluer on Jul 8, 2009 14:03:13 GMT -5
Sting............But Vampiro Own's All aha
|
|
|
|
Post by layton on Jul 8, 2009 14:38:41 GMT -5
Sting, because he's not a whiner.
|
|
|
|
Post by That guy next door. on Jul 8, 2009 14:42:30 GMT -5
Bret Hart.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jul 5, 2024 20:07:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2009 14:58:12 GMT -5
Sting has had a better career then anybody. He recently held the TNA belt for about 6 months, and his legacy is flawless. He's just under rated because he's never sold out to WWE. People also seem to forget about the god that was Surfer Sting.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jul 8, 2009 14:59:33 GMT -5
I voted for Bret Hart but Sting has done a lot recently but it was in tna so I don't care that much..  |
|
Jynxx
Superstar
Joined on: Mar 24, 2009 10:43:52 GMT -5
Posts: 767
|
Post by Jynxx on Jul 8, 2009 14:59:39 GMT -5
Sting, all though bret hart was one of the greatest, Sting is still a successful wrestler and top contender in TNA.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dude on Jul 8, 2009 15:03:11 GMT -5
I liked Bret better, but Sting has had a better career.
|
|
DB
Main Eventer
Only human
Joined on: Apr 25, 2009 11:14:07 GMT -5
Posts: 1,829
|
Post by DB on Jul 8, 2009 16:34:09 GMT -5
its funny how both had the same submission finisher.but i think sting had the better career.
|
|
|
|
Post by White Trash Lucha on Jul 8, 2009 16:35:45 GMT -5
Sting IMO
|
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Jul 8, 2009 16:52:52 GMT -5
Bret Hart...
Part of one of the greatest tag teams of all time
Leader of one of the greatest stables of all time
Involved in some of the greatest feuds of all time (HBK, Austin, Owen)
Climbed the WWE ladder in traditional fashion from tag team to IC to World champion, leaving his mark in each division.
WWE's top guy in the mid 90's
Sting had a great career but he can't match those achievements to quite the same degree.
|
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jul 8, 2009 16:54:16 GMT -5
I'll say Bret by a slim margin!
|
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Jul 8, 2009 18:38:26 GMT -5
Sting for success, longevity and becoming a star without ever working for Vince McMahon.
|
|
|
|
Post by WalterF on Jul 8, 2009 19:53:52 GMT -5
I'd say Bret. String has had more longevity of being a top player, but Bret was more popular and accomplished more "big matches" and had more concentrated success. I also think he's a better worker than String. I respect Sting, but Bret is my fav.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Jul 8, 2009 21:13:09 GMT -5
I'd say Bret Hart because he worked for both WWF and WCW and was the top champion for both promotions. However, just being in the WWF alone would make Bret Hart's career more successful.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jul 5, 2024 20:07:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2009 22:12:39 GMT -5
Sting had a great career but he can't match those achievements to quite the same degree wrong.  people, get the sting in japan dvds... |
|
