|
|
Post by shelleyrules on Jun 29, 2007 15:45:39 GMT -5
Mike Johnson of PWInsider reports:
Several weeks ago, I noted that MyNetworkTV was interested in TNA programming and that the two sides had met. As it turns out, I was wrong.
According to several entertainment industry sources in California, TNA actually met with the Fox network itself at that point, not MyNetworkTV. I've also confirmed negotiations are still moving forward at this point.
This potential TV deal could mean a pretty major jump in the amount of TV hours the company currently produces weekly because of the opportunity for exposure through multiple networks, as I am hearing this could be a multi-network deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Jun 29, 2007 16:37:09 GMT -5
That's not bad, TNA should do it if they want exposure. Fox can pour more money into advertising for them that TNA will actually benefit from it.
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 29, 2007 16:57:31 GMT -5
From what i heard, they are still on with Spike but the determining factor/ wild card is a two hour time slot. If Spike doesnt budge, TNA would move to another network..either way, a two hour timeslot seems to be the top priority amongst the negotiations.
Personally I dont know what the prob. Is. Can networks not see that with over 20 million viewers per week, wrestling is a hot commodity
|
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Jun 29, 2007 17:22:05 GMT -5
From what i heard, they are still on with Spike but the determining factor/ wild card is a two hour time slot. If Spike doesnt budge, TNA would move to another network..either way, a two hour timeslot seems to be the top priority amongst the negotiations. Personally I dont know what the prob. Is. Can networks not see that with over 20 million viewers per week, wrestling is a hot commodity Not when TNA draws less than a 2.0 rating per week and some weeks they are barely scratching 1.0. |
|
|
|
Post by American Phenom on Jun 29, 2007 17:31:51 GMT -5
I've heard rumors of iMPACT being on FX, with the possibility of a big 2 hour live special on Fox.
Good news, indeed.
|
|
|
|
Post by shelleyrules on Jun 29, 2007 18:23:20 GMT -5
From what i heard, they are still on with Spike but the determining factor/ wild card is a two hour time slot. If Spike doesnt budge, TNA would move to another network..either way, a two hour timeslot seems to be the top priority amongst the negotiations. Personally I dont know what the prob. Is. Can networks not see that with over 20 million viewers per week, wrestling is a hot commodity Not when TNA draws less than a 2.0 rating per week and some weeks they are barely scratching 1.0. Guess what, most shows on FOX aren't doing much better. That new show On The Lot has averaged a 1.2 since debuting and FOX spent 1.8 million dollars to develope and produce it. |
|
|
|
Post by nascar on Jun 29, 2007 19:49:40 GMT -5
I don't understand the rating so could someone help me ?
Does a 1.0 = 1 million or 10 million ? Thanks
|
|
|
|
Post by shelleyrules on Jun 29, 2007 20:02:40 GMT -5
I don't understand the rating so could someone help me ? Does a 1.0 = 1 million or 10 million ? Thanks 1 million for cable. |
|
|
|
Post by Iron Man on Jun 29, 2007 23:40:47 GMT -5
this is great for TNA. Spike and possibley Fox, with a 2 hour time slot of Fox, nothing but good news for TNA and the wrestling business. Hopefully, they can get there rating higher.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jun 30, 2007 0:57:24 GMT -5
I don't get the Fox channel that TNA used to be on. So, if they go back to that channel, it would suck.
|
|
|
|
Post by voltage123 on Jun 30, 2007 1:12:02 GMT -5
I dislike the FOX network, so I hope Spike gives them 2 hours
|
|
|
|
Post by wwemark1 on Jun 30, 2007 2:15:45 GMT -5
Hey Slappy, they aren't going to FSN (Fox Sports Network) they are talking about the FX channel. The actual Fox channel. Which I think would be great.
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 30, 2007 7:45:41 GMT -5
I wouldnt mind the FX channel. I think it'd be a boost for FOX, and they are known for there edgey shows. Spike just doesnt seem to give a rip and is slowly falling into non existence with the crap they put on...they might as well call themselves the UFC/ stupidest shows channel for as much crap that they show
|
|
|
|
Post by taihyll on Jun 30, 2007 10:03:37 GMT -5
Fox is horrible, plus they seem to hate wrestling as of late.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jun 30, 2007 11:18:04 GMT -5
Hey Slappy, they aren't going to FSN (Fox Sports Network) they are talking about the FX channel. The actual Fox channel. Which I think would be great. FX is a good channel. Great news. |
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Jun 30, 2007 15:39:39 GMT -5
I don't get FX... Boo-urns.
|
|
|
|
Post by wcw24 on Jun 30, 2007 16:51:03 GMT -5
I think being on FX will give them more ratings; because FX /FOX is viewed more by the mainstream, unlike SPIKE which is geared towards men. Granted there is nothing wrong with SPIKE gearing their channel towards men, but women, and kids are into wrestling as well. SPIKE is also focused more on UFC; which is the reason why TNA hasnt had as good of ratings as they should. Pinning a scripted wrestling program to compete against a shoot-fighting program on the same network. Having competeing programs on the same network don't bode well for neither show; nor the network.
|
|
|
|
Post by iammjlol on Jun 30, 2007 17:08:03 GMT -5
a two hour show, plus the possibility of other shows, is killer.
however, something scares me about leaving spiketv, seeing as how spiketv is more lenient to reality, compared to most stations... i.e. the ufc.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Jun 30, 2007 17:11:12 GMT -5
FX will also promote the show a year in advance like they do with every other show.
FX>Spike
Hell if TNA came on before Nip/Tuck, Rescue Me, or It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, they've got me hooked.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 21, 2024 12:51:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 30, 2007 17:19:31 GMT -5
Better not affect the UK viewing.
|
|
