|
|
Post by Scotty on Sept 16, 2009 18:44:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by muccguy88 on Sept 16, 2009 19:18:53 GMT -5
i dont think so. the mattel protos look like fuller figs. by that i mean they rnt as skinny in some places. i think the mattel figs look more realistic
|
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Sept 16, 2009 19:22:55 GMT -5
WWE/ Mattel look way more detailed with fantastic sculpting. The bodies look more realistic then anything Toybiz or Jakks have done so far.
|
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Sept 18, 2009 8:05:07 GMT -5
No way, those TNA things were horrible, mattel is superstar specific.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan88 on Sept 18, 2009 10:23:24 GMT -5
Nope, TNA figures looked awful. not really like real muscles, scans or nothing, mattel's are far more superior.
|
|
|
|
Post by ballinbrother44 on Sept 18, 2009 13:43:45 GMT -5
No, hopefully Mattel's come out better than those and hopefully they don't break as easily.
|
|
bobsagetbrigade
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Jan 21, 2009 20:20:01 GMT -5
Posts: 409
|
Post by bobsagetbrigade on Sept 18, 2009 15:25:32 GMT -5
I own mattel protos so I can say NO not at all
|
|
