|
|
Post by Thick Justice on Nov 9, 2009 3:08:53 GMT -5
Those suck. They are way too ripped. Most of the wrestlers are muscular but not ripped. Everyone of these is super ripped. Triple H is horrible. Way too ripped. He is big but you can't really see even a six pack unless he is flexing. This is like way more then even a six pack.
|
|
|
|
Post by ericbischoff on Nov 9, 2009 6:36:16 GMT -5
:-) About time to see people posted with "urgh" etc abut Mattel, because I knew their gonna to be terrible, and using the cheap plastic as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by jthomps3 on Nov 9, 2009 6:38:54 GMT -5
Man, Mattel sucks!
|
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Nov 9, 2009 8:18:45 GMT -5
While Mattel's faces aren't the best made (they aren't the worst either) And I'm sure they'll get better as time goes on. I'd take Mattel's basic figures as a whole over Jakks RA/TTL/R3 any day. Jakks figures are just as ripped...they have thunder thighs and fat ankles and many times the heads are out of scale with their bodies. Not only that they aren't in scale within their own line which has always been my major complaint. The main problem I'm concerned about with Mattel is their distribution. They've had the Batman/DC license since 03 and still have many difficulties getting the product on the shelves.
|
|
bencw
Main Eventer
30 refs. aka ecworiginal.
Joined on: Dec 22, 2008 8:04:49 GMT -5
Posts: 4,273
|
Post by bencw on Nov 9, 2009 11:39:48 GMT -5
i prefer jakks. unrealistic, but i still prefer them. maybe its cos i'm too 'used' to jakks.
|
|
|
|
Post by shogun on Nov 9, 2009 11:51:51 GMT -5
I don't like how HHH's obliques overlap onto his lats. That's totally against the grain of standard human anatomy and, ultimately, very stupid  |
|
|
|
Post by pwsphil on Nov 9, 2009 12:13:26 GMT -5
I really cant believe alot of people dont like these! I think these are awesome! The Batista is amazing. Triple H looks great too. How are you guys complaing about "too ripped"? After we got Cody Rhodes with a HW torso from Jakks ? You guys are crazy and never will be satisfied.
|
|
|
|
Post by texasdeathstyle on Nov 9, 2009 14:16:16 GMT -5
Looking at Mattel's HHH figure alone, my initial reaction was like "Wow that's amazing". But the moment , I saw the side by side comparison with Jakks DA HHH figure, I have to admit that I prefered Jakks' version. But then again, the DA version is one of the best HHH Jakks has ever done imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Nov 9, 2009 14:20:36 GMT -5
YES MATTEL YES!
These are phenominally good, I can't imagine why anyone would think otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Post by the franchise on Nov 9, 2009 15:10:10 GMT -5
They look fine compared to a JAKKS figure.
|
|
|
|
Post by Calcifer Boheme on Nov 9, 2009 15:16:44 GMT -5
I think they look great. They're different, but that' not always bad.
I'm just looking forward to later series, I think they'll end up getting even better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Nov 9, 2009 15:33:25 GMT -5
OMGGZZZZ BIG SHOW IS TALLER THAN TRIPLE H!!! MATTELL RULES!!!!!
yeah...notsomuch
Big Show's Jakks figures are taller than the others. That Triple H looks like a cheap over-detailed piece of garbage. Take a look at Triple H next time he is wrestling...does he have an 8 pack? Do his thigh muscles protrude out on top of other muscles? Jakks may have a "baloon arm" style but its sure as hell more realistic looking overall than this Mattell stuff.
It makes me wonder you people still would be all over Mattell's jock if Jakks was actually putting effort into making the Classic line, and not leaving out details on other figures.
I will forever say that Jakks past work is greater than anything Mattell will bring to the table.
And before everyone jumps on the "Elite" & "Entrance greats" bandwagon...remember, they are going to cost $15-$20 for ONE FIGURE. Jakks could have easily given cloth shirts & "leather" entrance coats to their figures, but they wouldn't have been sitting pretty at $9.99 each, that's for damn sure
|
|
|
|
Post by stlcardinalsfan on Nov 9, 2009 15:48:17 GMT -5
ii think they look great, i like mattels products. but i can see how someone not familiar mattel or is just use to jakks could be upset.
|
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Nov 9, 2009 15:50:06 GMT -5
I always knew Triple H was taller than The Flash.
|
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Nov 9, 2009 16:00:18 GMT -5
When it comes to heads....Mattel=FAIL! Give them time. Jakks scans have gotten better as the years went on, so Mattel may also. This is their first series. |
|
|
|
Post by JTG on Nov 9, 2009 16:37:55 GMT -5
I like the Mattel bodies more, but Jakks scans definatly win.
|
|
hitman1072
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 9, 2005 1:43:07 GMT -5
Posts: 1,495
|
Post by hitman1072 on Nov 9, 2009 17:06:27 GMT -5
Thank God Mattel has the license. Jakks is absolutely pathetic. Seriously...anyone saying Jakks is better than Mattel has little to no taste at all. I just feel bad that the UFC has to have Jakks representing them in the action figure market. Those UFC figures are absolutely horrible as well. Waaaaaaaaaaa...I want nothing but RA's because I am so used to buying sh*t that I don't know a good product when I see it.  |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Nov 9, 2009 21:34:41 GMT -5
why is this not over on the mattel board?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 14:09:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 9, 2009 22:45:05 GMT -5
I gurantee half the people that are saying Mattel looks crappy will be buying them & posting pics in the Mattel board
|
|
|
|
Post by Smash Ventura on Nov 9, 2009 23:51:58 GMT -5
im glad for the folks who like them but im not impressed... ill give them credit for being better with scale but thats it... other then big show these guys look boney and thin... for those excited i say enjoy and have fun:: but for me i am very happy with my classic collection and ill be saving my cash for the jakks nwa line  |
|
