|
Post by stlcardinalsfan on Nov 16, 2009 16:10:49 GMT -5
everything after 19
|
|
bencw
Main Eventer
30 refs. aka ecworiginal.
Joined on: Dec 22, 2008 8:04:49 GMT -5
Posts: 4,273
|
Post by bencw on Nov 16, 2009 16:15:52 GMT -5
Hmmmm...11 in my opinion... That was bambam vs Taylor wasn't it?
|
|
|
Post by HugoOne on Nov 16, 2009 16:23:06 GMT -5
So many answers absolutely BAFFLE me. PPVs can be redeemed by classic matches, as is why 25 and 13 cannot be considered the worst: both contained 5 star classics. 9 is by far the most irredeemable Wrestlemania with no good coming out of it whatsoever.
|
|
|
Post by Flava Dave on Nov 16, 2009 16:26:37 GMT -5
So many answers absolutely BAFFLE me. PPVs can be redeemed by classic matches, as is why 25 and 13 cannot be considered the worst: both contained 5 star classics. 9 is by far the most irredeemable Wrestlemania with no good coming out of it whatsoever. I consider 11 worse that 9 just because 9 is outdoors and has the cheesy Roman theme.
|
|
|
Post by Slay on Nov 16, 2009 16:30:22 GMT -5
are you serious? i probably would have to say either 9,11,15 all were pretty bad The event felt bigger than it actually was, just personal opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Zigzag on Nov 16, 2009 17:36:23 GMT -5
11 has sentimental value for me... It was my first live-attended Mania, and my second live wrestling event.
9 is my personal worst.
|
|
missedgehead
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 14, 2008 22:24:41 GMT -5
Posts: 3,178
|
Post by missedgehead on Nov 16, 2009 18:27:31 GMT -5
I have SEEN (on tape and live): Manias 3, 10,17 through 25.
The one I think is the worst: 18 and 25
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Nov 16, 2009 19:05:52 GMT -5
I hated Wrestlemania 21.
|
|
Starscream
Superstar
"In my restless dreams. I see that town...."
Joined on: Sept 9, 2009 20:11:52 GMT -5
Posts: 544
|
Post by Starscream on Nov 16, 2009 19:09:02 GMT -5
25...reasons?the main event...the most predictable match in the history of WM,poor MITB,lame IC title match.
|
|
|
Post by JTG on Nov 16, 2009 19:18:31 GMT -5
I though WM21 was the worst. It didn't have that epic Wrestlemania feel to it IMO.
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Nov 16, 2009 19:31:57 GMT -5
WM2000 WMXI WM25 WMXV
|
|
|
Post by kahnspiricy on Nov 16, 2009 19:33:55 GMT -5
11 was pretty bad.
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Nov 16, 2009 19:37:21 GMT -5
WM 25 came to mind right away.
23 was not that good either.
I only really saw 15-25 so I am not counting the older Wm's.
|
|
|
Post by ericbischoff on Nov 16, 2009 19:41:52 GMT -5
WrestleMania 23 and WrestleMania 25 was terrible, so do WrestleMania 11, in my opnion
|
|
hbkrules
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
Joined on: Jun 18, 2002 11:49:32 GMT -5
Posts: 2,115
|
Post by hbkrules on Nov 16, 2009 19:48:57 GMT -5
In terms of main event 13 was the worst ever. Terrible buildup and terrible match, at least orton hhh at WM 25 had good buildup.
|
|
|
Post by Bubba Ray DJ on Nov 16, 2009 20:00:08 GMT -5
13 was such a mess.
|
|
penguin
Superstar
Joined on: Jan 26, 2003 16:46:02 GMT -5
Posts: 707
|
Post by penguin on Nov 16, 2009 20:17:03 GMT -5
25 comes to mind right away. Michaels vs Undertaker was fantastic. One of my favorite matches in a long time, but the show overall was just really bad.
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Nov 16, 2009 20:43:46 GMT -5
11 or 25
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Nov 16, 2009 21:35:42 GMT -5
9 by far. The only redeeming quality was that it featured JR's WWF debut.
|
|
J-Swift
Main Eventer
Formerly known as: WHO DAT!!?!!??!
Joined on: Jun 27, 2009 0:19:04 GMT -5
Posts: 1,749
|
Post by J-Swift on Nov 16, 2009 22:18:58 GMT -5
WM 9 was bad Fap.
|
|