|
|
Post by Tim of thee on Nov 20, 2009 16:10:44 GMT -5
wes welker or mike sims walker
|
|
One Love
Main Eventer
We Suck
Joined on: Aug 12, 2005 10:56:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,589
|
Post by One Love on Nov 20, 2009 16:35:04 GMT -5
Sims...
|
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Nov 20, 2009 16:44:52 GMT -5
Welker really shouldn't be on your bench unless you're in a touchdown-heavy scoring system.
He's averaging over 9 receptions per game. Though Sims-Walker has a nice matchup against Buffalo and very well could outscore Welker, he could also lay an egg. I just don't see how Welker can be sat right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tim of thee on Nov 20, 2009 18:53:36 GMT -5
the thing I like about welker is that he is in a very pass heavy offense
but he's not the number 1 guy on their team
having said that, sims-walker is a clearcut starter on the jags, but he has been known to "lay eggs" (love the term)
other wrs I have are reggie wayne/sidney rice/wes welker/mike sims-walker
maybe sims-walker over rice? (heh.. no lame sushi joke here!)
anyways, what you guys think?
|
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Nov 20, 2009 18:55:42 GMT -5
Wayne
Welker
Sims-Walker
Rice
In that order
|
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Nov 20, 2009 19:01:15 GMT -5
Fun fact:
The Bills have only allowed 2 passing touchdowns to opposing teams' WR's all year.
And despite Wes Welker technically not being the team's "#1 receiver," he puts up stats that are better than most teams' #1 receiver.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ace Bennett on Nov 21, 2009 12:49:52 GMT -5
I'd put Sims-Walker on the bench in this situation. The others are all pretty much guaranteed 9 points. That is, unless Welker gets Darelle Revis covering him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tim of thee on Nov 21, 2009 15:02:11 GMT -5
well, how about sims-walker or sidney rice?
who is a better start at wideout
|
|
One Love
Main Eventer
We Suck
Joined on: Aug 12, 2005 10:56:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,589
|
Post by One Love on Nov 21, 2009 15:37:33 GMT -5
Rice.
|
|
