|
|
Post by extreme on Dec 31, 2009 2:15:26 GMT -5
replace swoggle for bret.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dude on Dec 31, 2009 2:18:28 GMT -5
If I was Vince I would keep Cena. Who will be making money for him in 10 years?  Didn't he sign a 10 year contract a few years ago? |
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Dec 31, 2009 2:27:01 GMT -5
I'd choose Cena. Bret would be nice but who really cares about GM's that much. They don't really sell shirts or PPV's. EDIT: replace swoggle for bret. That would be the best upgrade ever. But seriously I would replace Hornswoggle with anyone even a random bum off the street.  |
|
|
|
Post by mnm213 on Dec 31, 2009 2:30:32 GMT -5
I refuse to see how this is a stupid question, this is arguably the most anticipated return ever, and it can't happen unless you give up your biggest star. So what do you do? Go down in the history books with this return, or release Cena, who is already in the history books anyways?
|
|
|
|
Post by Random Hero Est. 2003 on Dec 31, 2009 2:49:27 GMT -5
The phrase "one step forward, two steps back" fits nicely with your idea
|
|
|
|
Post by mnm213 on Dec 31, 2009 2:51:50 GMT -5
The phrase "one step forward, two steps back" fits nicely with your idea Eh, I just thought of it since Cena isn't on Raw this week and Bret is, so I'm asking that if it stayed that way, would you do it. |
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Dec 31, 2009 3:08:32 GMT -5
I'll say yes, here's why and how.
Bret has the ability to draw back people who WWE lost when WCW went under, even as GM, because it's Bret Hart.
Kids will show up with or with out Cena. You just have to take the guy with the most charisma and good looks and throw him in that place, or CM Punk. The fact is, John Cena is replaceable, every one in WWE but Triple H, HBK, Undertaker, and Vince is. All you have to do is tell the crowd that John Cena "didn't want to entertain them anymore" and you're good. When I was a kid, I had no god damn clue otherwise, I'll bet these kids don't either.
It may knock WWE down for a second, but I doubt forever. Sure TNA could get Cena; but as long as those kids buy that new star, it's fine.
Just making an opposite side argument.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hurricane on Dec 31, 2009 5:31:18 GMT -5
Hell no. Bret's one of my all-time favs, but no.
|
|
WM = "The Viper"
Main Eventer
I hear voices in my head, they council me, they understand...
Joined on: Apr 19, 2006 13:13:11 GMT -5
Posts: 1,617
|
Post by WM = "The Viper" on Dec 31, 2009 6:40:34 GMT -5
No matter how much I hate Cena, probably not because it'd be bad for business. I'd be all for it, if WWE could get Jeff Hardy back or (try to) make a new star as popular as Cena is. But I doubt it, so no.
|
|
Irish Gaz
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Nov 10, 2009 17:31:48 GMT -5
Posts: 159
|
Post by Irish Gaz on Dec 31, 2009 7:59:57 GMT -5
Cena would be kept. It would be a no brainer from a business perspective. I can't wait to see Bret again, but why would you keep a man who can no longer wrestle over their biggest draw.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wrestlaholic on Dec 31, 2009 12:40:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by wabarrett on Dec 31, 2009 12:51:13 GMT -5
I'm confused as to why John Cena leaving has anything to do with Bret Hart returning? Why does Cena HAVE to be released for Bret Hart to be a big draw? So yeah, it does seem a stupid question. Or are you basically asking who I'd rather have in the WWE (or more to your point who would be better for business in the WWE) if there was some hypothetical situation where only one of them could stay?!?
To answer the question though, John Cena, without a shadow of a doubt. Cena has years ahead of him, Bret Hart might not even be in good enough condition to wrestle, so it's obvious to me.
|
|
500DaysofNight
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 30, 2001 10:19:35 GMT -5
Posts: 4,639
|
Post by 500DaysofNight on Dec 31, 2009 14:21:16 GMT -5
Cena, along with DX, is their biggest merch sellers. Cena might even have Stone Cold and Hogan topped. Seriously... I've never seen so many shirts, hats, wristbands and other stuff being worn as I did for Cena when I went to a house show a few weeks back.
They even have a pretty decent sized teenage girl fan base coming to their shows now because of Cena, which I can't remember ever happening before.
That being said, Cena isn't going anywhere for a LONG time. They seen what happened when the let The Rock become a full fledged movie star... they won't let it happen again.
|
|
|
|
Post by HugoOne on Dec 31, 2009 14:22:40 GMT -5
If I was Vince I would keep Cena. Who will be making money for him in 10 years? The pyrotechnicians? |
|
|
|
Post by wabarrett on Dec 31, 2009 14:38:22 GMT -5
Orton's entrance is boring without that pyro. It was like a waterfall of sparks....coooool. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 11:29:31 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2009 14:41:05 GMT -5
And just when we thought your threads couldn't possibly get anymore pointless...
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Dec 31, 2009 16:22:24 GMT -5
Half the kids dont know who bret is why in the  would you replace cena with him? dumb thread is thread |
|
|
|
Post by mnm213 on Dec 31, 2009 17:06:55 GMT -5
I'm confused as to why John Cena leaving has anything to do with Bret Hart returning? Why does Cena HAVE to be released for Bret Hart to be a big draw? So yeah, it does seem a stupid question. Or are you basically asking who I'd rather have in the WWE (or more to your point who would be better for business in the WWE) if there was some hypothetical situation where only one of them could stay?!? To answer the question though, John Cena, without a shadow of a doubt. Cena has years ahead of him, Bret Hart might not even be in good enough condition to wrestle, so it's obvious to me. Cena isn't on Raw this week, Bret is. That's the idea of the thread, if it stayed that way, would you do it. I fail to see how it's pointless, or stupid. There is alot of people saying they'd keep Bret over Cena. |
|
|
|
Post by The Future on Dec 31, 2009 18:16:08 GMT -5
I'm confused as to why John Cena leaving has anything to do with Bret Hart returning? Why does Cena HAVE to be released for Bret Hart to be a big draw? So yeah, it does seem a stupid question. Or are you basically asking who I'd rather have in the WWE (or more to your point who would be better for business in the WWE) if there was some hypothetical situation where only one of them could stay?!? To answer the question though, John Cena, without a shadow of a doubt. Cena has years ahead of him, Bret Hart might not even be in good enough condition to wrestle, so it's obvious to me. Cena isn't on Raw this week, Bret is. That's the idea of the thread, if it stayed that way, would you do it. I fail to see how it's pointless, or stupid. There is alot of people saying they'd keep Bret over Cena. But the fact is, the only people who'd really be satisfied with Bret on a consistent weekly basis over Cena are the smarks(who already watch anyway no matter what) and the OLD OLD school WWF fans- and since the WWE isn't going back to that way of being anytime soon...it'd be a waste of effort to try and lure them back given the product's target demographic and way of building guys up. None of those old school guys are finding the fountain of youth anytime soon, and it's necessary to move on with the future- and Cena is and has been the face of that new generation for a very long time now. |
|
Starscream
Superstar
"In my restless dreams. I see that town...."
Joined on: Sept 9, 2009 20:11:52 GMT -5
Posts: 544 
|
Post by Starscream on Dec 31, 2009 18:23:22 GMT -5
Bret is the best but Cena makes $$ so is no way in hell Vince is gonna release Cena...
|
|
