hammer
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 12, 2009 2:30:31 GMT -5
Posts: 2,619
|
Post by hammer on Jan 1, 2010 2:30:25 GMT -5
if its ended... it needs to be ended by somebody up and coming. edge or orton in the past wouldve been a solid choice... maybe punk nowadays is the only one on the cusp that needs a win like that to cement him. it shouldnt be michaels or triple h or even cena... who are there on their own. they dont need ending the undertakers streak, to make them a household name so to speak.
|
|
|
|
Post by ~*Young $ Money*~ on Jan 1, 2010 2:31:17 GMT -5
I really don't understand this whole should the streak end thing. I mean yeah its cool he did it and w/e but is he really undefeated? Its not like he really beat these people it was all pre determined that he was winning so i don't really see the big deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by BØRNS on Jan 1, 2010 3:33:03 GMT -5
For sure he needs to keep the streak until he finally retires for good. 20-0 would be the best way to end imo so he better not lose to HBK. I completely agree. Ending anything without a solid number like 20 would be dumb. Even if Undertaker has to return another year or two similarly to Hogan at SummerSlam to get to 20-0, then it will be worth the while. |
|
|
|
Post by The Silent Flute (joepetree) on Jan 1, 2010 4:13:14 GMT -5
i hope it ends at 20 - 0 and he retires but i hear he wants to go til 25 - 0
|
|
|
|
Post by raabhimselffanv2 on Jan 1, 2010 5:04:55 GMT -5
I dont like Undertaker, but the streak should never end.
|
|
CaK
Main Eventer
Possible Bad Trader Not allowed to trade here
Follow at @245TStudios!!!!
Joined on: May 6, 2006 8:52:03 GMT -5
Posts: 1,518
|
Post by CaK on Jan 1, 2010 5:27:10 GMT -5
For sure he needs to keep the streak until he finally retires for good. 20-0 would be the best way to end imo so he better not lose to HBK. I agree only because I dont think anyone...........ANYONE.......can beat that at all.......He will always have that legacy |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 8:25:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2010 5:36:07 GMT -5
he needs to retire with the streak so the undertaker leaves a huge legacy behind |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Old School™ on Jan 1, 2010 11:03:01 GMT -5
All good things must come to an end. That's all I'm going to say.
|
|
500DaysofNight
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 30, 2001 10:19:35 GMT -5
Posts: 4,639
|
Post by 500DaysofNight on Jan 1, 2010 12:29:49 GMT -5
If the Undertaker doesn't want to lose at Wrestlemania, then he's not going to lose at Wrestlemania.
|
|
|
|
Post by Beck on Jan 1, 2010 13:16:31 GMT -5
The steak should never die.
Also, I always think its stupid that Micheals is called Mr. Wrestlemania, this is a man who tapped out at Wrestlemania. Not cool.
|
|
|
|
Post by the franchise on Jan 1, 2010 14:21:45 GMT -5
They should probably have someone like Dibiase or Swagger beat Taker to get the push that would come with ending the streak.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 8:25:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2010 14:27:35 GMT -5
The steak should never die. Also, I always think its stupid that Micheals is called Mr. Wrestlemania, this is a man who tapped out at Wrestlemania. Not cool. He's Mr. WrestleMania because he's remembered, more often than not, for having the best match on the card, as opposed to adding another predictable "victim to the streak." |
|
