|
|
Post by Yeezy's Mullet: Team X Blades on Dec 31, 2009 20:38:55 GMT -5
On his last Wrestlemania(whenever that may be), you like to see the streak ended? If so, by whom? If not, then why?
I'm so split on this subject. Part of me wants to see Mr. Wrestlemania futher more cement that nickname by ending the phenom of Wrestlemania's streak. But the other part of me wants him to retire with the streak. I mean, this isn't just some title record here. It's gonna take the better part of twenty years to even come close to it. I just don't want to see such a dominant streak tarnished.
What do you guys think?
|
|
gravedigger3
Main Eventer
Empire Wrestling Federation
Joined on: Apr 7, 2006 21:17:04 GMT -5
Posts: 3,434
|
Post by gravedigger3 on Dec 31, 2009 20:44:35 GMT -5
he needs to retire with the streak so the undertaker leaves a huge legacy behind
|
|
Jamal
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 24, 2005 14:53:44 GMT -5
Posts: 4,877
|
Post by Jamal on Dec 31, 2009 20:48:30 GMT -5
It should end at 18-1.
In all seriousness though, I think he needs to keep it. No one should ever come close to it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Dec 31, 2009 20:49:51 GMT -5
lol he should keep it, and be the only one too have one.
|
|
Starscream
Superstar
"In my restless dreams. I see that town...."
Joined on: Sept 9, 2009 20:11:52 GMT -5
Posts: 544 
|
Post by Starscream on Dec 31, 2009 21:00:39 GMT -5
he needs to retire with the streak so the undertaker leaves a huge legacy behind This. |
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Dec 31, 2009 21:15:38 GMT -5
For sure he needs to keep the streak until he finally retires for good.
20-0 would be the best way to end imo so he better not lose to HBK.
|
|
WFK
Main Eventer
Leave The Memories Alone
Joined on: Oct 27, 2004 17:56:58 GMT -5
Posts: 4,632
|
Post by WFK on Dec 31, 2009 21:21:54 GMT -5
Definitely let him keep the streak. It's something that hasn't been done before nor will it ever be done again.
|
|
|
|
Post by mnm213 on Dec 31, 2009 21:22:07 GMT -5
People will remember him winning 17 times than losing once. I think it's good business that they keep it intact though.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 6:45:02 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2009 21:22:55 GMT -5
No question he needs to retire with the streak intact. Honestly tell me who has he beaten that's wrestled to obscurity after losing to him? No one I can recall, except Giant Hernandez but no one cared about him, at least I didn't. Losing to Taker at WM won't kill off anyone who had at least decent buildup as a serious competitor, hell losing may put them over better than winning. No one can replicate the Streak besides MAYBE, MAYBE Cena, and that would even be pushing the limits of his novelty. That's grounds alone for letting Taker retire with the streak.
|
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Dec 31, 2009 21:30:39 GMT -5
The streak is one of the greatest legacies of all of professional wrestling. Ending it would be a gigantic mistake.
|
|
|
|
Post by chrispage on Dec 31, 2009 21:45:15 GMT -5
Ending this is foolish.
Undertaker needs to retire with something... the streak is basically the best thing Taker has.
What are multiple World Title reigns now that guys like CM Punk and Jeff Hardy have done it?
|
|
|
|
Post by DgenerationX092 on Dec 31, 2009 22:14:21 GMT -5
Im a HUGE Michaels fan, but NOBODY should end the streak.
No streak is more famous in wrestling, and it should stay. Without the Streak, what does the Undertaker have? Sure he's got championships, but he will, and should be remembered for the streak.
|
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Dec 31, 2009 22:17:51 GMT -5
While I dont think a streak in wrestling is important at all seeing as how things are predetermined, its too far along now to end it without a really good reason
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 6:45:02 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2009 22:21:13 GMT -5
Well, it would be kind of hard to believe they'd make the same guy job to Taker two years in a row, assuming Michaels faces him again this year. At the same time, it would also be a strange booking decision in my opinion to have Michaels be the one to end it...why him of all people? He has nothing to gain because he has 26 years of wrestling experience and has already done it all. You'd think they'd have a youngster do it to boost their career...
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Wrestling on Dec 31, 2009 22:35:26 GMT -5
No question he needs to retire with the streak intact. Honestly tell me who has he beaten that's wrestled to obscurity after losing to him? No one I can recall, except Giant Hernandez but no one cared about him, at least I didn't. Losing to Taker at WM won't kill off anyone who had at least decent buildup as a serious competitor, hell losing may put them over better than winning. No one can replicate the Streak besides MAYBE, MAYBE Cena, and that would even be pushing the limits of his novelty. That's grounds alone for letting Taker retire with the streak. No, he can't. He already lost. |
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Dec 31, 2009 22:42:53 GMT -5
If if was to end, being honest Cena is the only guy who has a chance of ending it
|
|
|
|
Post by BigDaddyChacon on Dec 31, 2009 23:11:11 GMT -5
he needs to retire with the streak so the undertaker leaves a huge legacy behind My thoughts exactly. |
|
DB
Main Eventer
Only human
Joined on: Apr 25, 2009 11:14:07 GMT -5
Posts: 1,829
|
Post by DB on Dec 31, 2009 23:16:15 GMT -5
They should let him win another match at wrestlemania 26 and have him retire on the same night.
|
|
missedgehead
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 14, 2008 22:24:41 GMT -5
Posts: 3,178
|
Post by missedgehead on Jan 1, 2010 0:12:15 GMT -5
Let him retire with the streak
|
|
CrazyCale
Main Eventer
I ain't gonna be part of this system!
Joined on: May 8, 2009 17:46:28 GMT -5
Posts: 1,387
|
Post by CrazyCale on Jan 1, 2010 2:25:29 GMT -5
Vince already will give taker a title win at any moment he wants since Vince doesn't want to lose him. with that in mind, do you think after 18 years or so Vince would have one of his biggest assets have their biggest accomplishment taken away by some new guy that will never amount to Taker? Thats what I thought...
|
|
