|
|
Post by The Sexy Psychotic on Jan 1, 2010 13:04:37 GMT -5
Well, simple, how, or actually why did WWE never do Austin/Taker in Hell in a Cell?
I mean, it would have been a huge money maker, and since these two put on great normal matches, there really wouldn't have been much need for a big spot
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 2, 2024 22:26:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2010 13:49:59 GMT -5
I did often wonder that......I had heard that Buried Alive between them was supposed to be a HIAC but was changed for some reason.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Old School™ on Jan 1, 2010 13:58:11 GMT -5
I have no idea, but it certainly would've been a hell of a match. No pun intended.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 2, 2024 22:26:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2010 14:04:44 GMT -5
Kurt Angle, The Undertaker, Triple H, Steve Austin, Rikishi, and The Rock had one, if that counts
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sexy Psychotic on Jan 1, 2010 14:49:44 GMT -5
Kurt Angle, The Undertaker, Triple H, Steve Austin, Rikishi, and The Rock had one, if that counts Yea, but even in that match, they don't really interact much |
|
