|
|
Post by DTP. on Jan 5, 2010 2:51:07 GMT -5
I haven't seen iMPACT or RAW yet, but what it looks like is that the homegrown talent haven't been drawing, obviously. But on the bright side, what have TNA done since September? Pushed their homegrown stars. Looks like they're changing back though. Also, nWo returning? Don't WWE own the rights to those initials? I have no problem with nWo's members (except Hall and Hogan on some days) but didn't we just have nWo with MEM? Pretty sure we did, and like the original nWo in 1999, it faded away and was forgotten about.
|
|
|
|
Post by 3Lephant (Naptown Icon) on Jan 5, 2010 12:15:46 GMT -5
Oh, and the fact that JB who has been there for years gets physically pushed out of a camera shot for a guy whos name is Bubba the Love Sponge? Are you  ing kidding me? Thats really the only part I agreed with of your posts. When you're going for ratings you have to introduce the new TNA characters, it makes sense to me. You can't expect to go in with a higher rating by just showing the same old stuff...Not that there is anything wrong with it. I was in Dayton for the Raw show, but I came home and watched TNA and to be honest with you, I thought TNA was better |
|
|
|
Post by RSCTom on Jan 5, 2010 13:07:43 GMT -5
Well if you wanna watch Randy Orton in another headlock classic... be my guest. I'd much rather watch people who entertain me than see the same match performed 5 times a show. Burned. I'm in for TNA. And I will always be where Sean Waltman is. Be it Mexico or Mars... |
|
|
|
Post by 49% Motherf**ker, 51% SOB on Jan 5, 2010 17:26:17 GMT -5
I don't understand why Impact is being looked at under a microscope so much right now. When I had WWE 24/7 I would watch the old Raw and Nitro's and majority of the those shows sucked. The only big moments in those shows were the beginning, middle, and end. Sometimes those weren't even that great. Considering how TNA has been for most of the past 8 years I think they are off to a good start with a new audience.
|
|
