zappa2510
Main Eventer
- 45 Refs & Counting -
Joined on: Nov 23, 2008 23:43:39 GMT -5
Posts: 1,471
|
Post by zappa2510 on Jan 5, 2010 19:25:10 GMT -5
the big thing is to see what Raw's ratings was.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy on Jan 5, 2010 19:26:06 GMT -5
To be honest, I'd bet even if Bret wasn't on RAW last night they would have won. Of course they would have. 100%. No doubt about it. |
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Jan 5, 2010 19:26:20 GMT -5
Also...
Quarter hours are in for last night's three-hour LIVE Impact
1.58
1.70
1.78
1.71
1.88
1.30
1.42
1.16
1.17
1.21
1.19
1.30
|
|
|
|
Post by 3Lephant (Naptown Icon) on Jan 5, 2010 19:33:22 GMT -5
Also... Quarter hours are in for last night's three-hour LIVE Impact 1.58 1.70 1.78 1.71 1.88 1.30 1.42 1.16 1.17 1.21 1.19 1.30 So then the argument becomes was it a 1.88 because of Hogan, or because of Hogan and the nWo? |
|
|
|
Post by HugoOne on Jan 5, 2010 19:33:21 GMT -5
Actually, the biggest thing is to see what the next Impact's numbers are like. If they're consistent, that's great for them, but that remains to be seen.
|
|
|
|
Post by wwfepenguin on Jan 5, 2010 19:41:56 GMT -5
Great news, it was a great show, that rating is amazing how they topped their average rating while going head to head with Raw.
|
|
|
|
Post by af2002ty on Jan 5, 2010 19:42:12 GMT -5
Wow, do you have anything positive to say? I've seen about 4-5 of your posts and they all are a little negative buddy. |
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hammers on Jan 5, 2010 19:52:33 GMT -5
It doesn't help that alot of people watched it at justin's house. I mean there was like 5000 people in one room.
¬_¬
|
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Jan 5, 2010 19:57:16 GMT -5
Wow, do you have anything positive to say? I've seen about 4-5 of your posts and they all are a little negative buddy. |
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Jan 5, 2010 20:00:02 GMT -5
Aren't they getting between a 1 and a 1.3. I wouldn't call this a victory. Exactly. Also, this is an average rating. Lets see the hour breakdown. I am sure many wrestling fans tuned into hour 1 and then left at 9pmEST. Head to head is where we will see if TNA got any lift. Cuz RAW certainly did getting a 3.37. |
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Jan 5, 2010 20:05:59 GMT -5
In other words, they only time they really did better than usual was when they were running unopposed leading in to Raw. No real surprise there. This is about how each show broke down at these times. (all times are central, sorry for everybody else)
1.58 - 7:00 - Asylum, unopposed
1.70 - 7:15 - Knockouts title, unopposed
1.78 - 7:30 - Bobby Lashley promo, unopposed
1.71 - 7:45 - Ric Flair's arrival and other backstage segments, unopposed
1.88 - 8:00 - Hogan promo vs. Hart/HBK
1.30 - 8:15 - Knockouts Tag vs. Maryse/Bellas
1.42 - 8:30 - Tag match vs. US Title Four-way
1.16 - 8:45 - Dinero/Wolfe vs. backstage segments
1.17 - 9:00 - Jarrett promo vs. DX/Jerishow
1.21 - 9:15 - Joe/Abyss vs. Sheamus/Bourne
1.19 - 9:30 - AJ/Angle vs. Orton/Kofi
1.30 - 9:45 - AJ/Angle vs. Hart/McMahon
The only thing that deserved high ratings did just about the worse, and that was the main event.
|
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Jan 5, 2010 20:44:47 GMT -5
Id love to see the total time of commercials during TNA last night
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 5, 2010 20:47:15 GMT -5
Id love to see the total time of commercials during TNA last night 2 hours 45 minutes. |
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Jan 5, 2010 20:50:33 GMT -5
Id love to see the total time of commercials during TNA last night 2 hours 45 minutes. Sounds about right Tenay: Welcome back to the impact zone Commerical: Hi its Vince from Slap Chop |
|
|
|
Post by Random Hero Est. 2003 on Jan 5, 2010 20:57:26 GMT -5
Anyone who says this is anything but remarkable for tna, is a tool.
Fth. This night belongs to us
|
|
|
|
Post by 1992 on Jan 5, 2010 21:04:34 GMT -5
The commercial's were  ing ridiculous. I remember at one point there was a time when it went to commericial, came back for about 30 seconds to a min, cut back to commercial's, came back for about 30 seconds to a min, cut back to commercial's, about 30 seconds to a min, cut back to commercial's, came back for good. When Hogan was walking out my GF said, "What history here in TNA!....after this message from our sponsors." and I was half expecting another wave of commercial's during his entrance. |
|
Ace Gervase
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 11, 2002 16:09:33 GMT -5
Posts: 1,581
|
Post by Ace Gervase on Jan 5, 2010 21:30:00 GMT -5
I actually expected the worst rating ever. This is good news to me. Hogan is insane if he actually thought he would get a 3.0 rating with no real build up other than his own involvement. Everyone is trying to make this negative. I actually liked the show. It wasn't great, but it was good enough for me. Those of you who said it sucked based on Hogan's presence are typical internet wrestling nerds, making you a minority in terms of overall wrestling fans. The first hour was pretty rough. The first match was an abortion. They need to do away with the steel asylum altogether. Things got better as they went on. They need to step it up and keep things rolling. They can't compete with Raw, but if things keep getting better (which I thought they were) then they may see a slow and steady rise, maybe eventually get a full time spot on Monday night. Even if they aren't competitive and are just pulling in decent ratings I would love have Monday become wrestling night again. What? Haha. That just about made no sense. Try better next time, brother! Exactly. TNA made a success. Drawing their biggest rating during RAW is great. I hope they dont pull any punches for the next show. And now for all those who watched last night will tune in next week to see what goes on with guys like Hogan, Flair, and TNA's huge draw of Hardy. Maybe, but once they see Hogan/Bischoff/Nash/Hall/Waltman taking over TNA... they'll most likely say to themselves "Hey! This sucked when WCW did it, when WWE tried to re-create it and still does now!" and change the channel and watch The Office. - Triple S[/quote] thats cause nothing beats the office!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Scarlet Begonias on Jan 5, 2010 21:56:20 GMT -5
That sucks for TNA. 1.5 vs. 4.0......
|
|
|
|
Post by Random Hero Est. 2003 on Jan 5, 2010 22:22:31 GMT -5
That sucks for TNA. 1.5 vs. 4.0...... That sucks for wwe. They pulled in a 4.5 when trump hosted..... Trump got bigger ratings than Bret? Lol. All the wwe marks are afraid to admit that tna effected raws rating. Tna did beast numbers. Going up against wwe and they increase their audience? Damn, that's big. Real big. I expected raw to pull a 4.9 at least, but looks like Bret couldn't do it. |
|
|
|
Post by Boy Wonder on Jan 5, 2010 22:35:14 GMT -5
From what I read Spike wanted TNA to do the same that it does on Thursdays or better and it did, so it met their hopes
|
|
