|
|
Post by LtD73 on Jan 10, 2010 8:22:55 GMT -5
Yeah, i know i did 1 last year and gave up  But i'll actually complete it this year Anyway..... 1/4/10 (Live) - 1.5 1/7/10 (Live repeat) - 0.9 1/14/10 - 1.3 1/21/10 - 1.3 1/28/10 - 1.4 2/4/10 - 1.2 2/11/10 - 1.2 2/18/10 - 1.2 2/25/10 - 1.1 3/4/10 - 1.1 3/8/10 - 1.0 3/15/10 - 0.8 3/22/10 - 0.9 3/29/10 |
|
|
|
Post by laythvandam on Jan 10, 2010 8:28:26 GMT -5
How did one get 0.9 when it hasn't even aired yet?
|
|
KyleBeech
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 31, 2006 14:58:06 GMT -5
Posts: 2,396
|
Post by KyleBeech on Jan 10, 2010 8:31:30 GMT -5
It was a repeat of 4/1
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jan 10, 2010 9:37:32 GMT -5
I didn't know they repeated it but I guess they didn't have anything to show in its place.
I guess this beats a hundred threads each week about the ratings.
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jan 10, 2010 10:41:22 GMT -5
Before everyone goes gaga in this thread about how impressive impacts ratings are, I'd like you to take a look at something: This is an excerpt from the Monday night wars ratings scale with RAW on the left column and nitro on the right: Notice how in two years time Nitro was able to go up 2 million viewers. Now this was before Raw made there big move as well, however, even Raw maintained their core fans while WCW built new fans...In 2 years!!! Now, some will argue that it was a different time period and i agree, but my point is...how can one company go up 2 million viewers in 2 years and a company that has been in existence for 7 years can't even consitently keep 1 million viewers? ANd it's not like TNA is a company full of no name wrestlers when they started. Many of the guys that started TNA were old WCW guys, so there was a fanbase there already. SO they needed a TV deal, they got it and nothing, so they get bigger names stars, and the ratings barely budge. My point, as I've been saying, and this is towards those that are vehemently argumentative about TNA being "successful", is that if TNA can't do anymore then give us cheap pops, then that 1.5 will be the first and last highest rating they'll have this year. I'm hoping I am wrong, but I know better by now. I suppose this thread will allow us to just wait and see. |
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Jan 10, 2010 11:19:03 GMT -5
1/4/10 will remain the highest until they decide to go live weekly
|
|
|
|
Post by 3Lephant (Naptown Icon) on Jan 10, 2010 18:39:26 GMT -5
1/4/10 will remain the highest until they decide to go live weekly Pains me to say, but I will have to agree |
|
|
|
Post by Ministry of Darkness on Jan 10, 2010 23:36:08 GMT -5
True! 1/4/10 will remain the highest until they decide to go live weekly Pains me to say, but I will have to agree |
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Jan 16, 2010 7:56:35 GMT -5
Updated
|
|
|
|
Post by matt092 on Jan 16, 2010 20:20:41 GMT -5
WOW 1.3 not's so bad.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mac on Jan 16, 2010 22:08:23 GMT -5
I think a 1.3 is pretty damn good  |
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Jan 22, 2010 19:03:33 GMT -5
updated  |
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jan 22, 2010 22:14:00 GMT -5
Damn I just posted in the other thread about the ratings but I was about to say where is the big thread that is suppose to do away with the weekly ratings thread?
And here it is!
|
|
orpheous
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 6, 2010 21:06:59 GMT -5
Posts: 1,406
|
Post by orpheous on Jan 23, 2010 22:49:00 GMT -5
need to atleast stay 1.3 from now on... i try to go to as many live shows as i can since i live an hour away
|
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Jan 29, 2010 17:54:07 GMT -5
good first month by tna
|
|
|
|
Post by The Mac on Jan 29, 2010 18:00:42 GMT -5
a 1.4 is really good for TNA, I thougth the show was good so am glad!
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jan 29, 2010 19:28:25 GMT -5
need to atleast stay 1.3 from now on... i try to go to as many live shows as i can since i live an hour away dude, i'd be there every week. I thought the show last week was ve good except for the stupid ending. This weeks show fixed some things and I expect the numbers to be the same. now that TNA has some interest, let's hope they can continue |
|
|
|
Post by wwfepenguin on Jan 30, 2010 7:09:37 GMT -5
1.4? Damn, they almost tied 1/4.
|
|
orpheous
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 6, 2010 21:06:59 GMT -5
Posts: 1,406
|
Post by orpheous on Jan 30, 2010 7:20:33 GMT -5
1.4 ... there actually gaining! Where are all the people on here that said it was downhill when hogan arrived??? I dont know but it has brought excitement to the wrestling world....
|
|
|
|
Post by dmallett4 on Jan 30, 2010 7:46:19 GMT -5
some decent ratings. its about damn time they gained some viewers tbh, after years of trundling along at 0.8/0.9's.
|
|
