|
|
Post by Byron F'N Saxton Fan on Mar 23, 2010 16:46:47 GMT -5
I kinda agree with you that it was a good show. But the lower the ratings get; the less time we have to watch the good show that we like. The sad thing is; is Vince has brainwashed his fans into thinking that his show is good. The WWE fans don't know what good really is. It's not brainwashing when RAW's ratings shuffle every week. It's been shown if people don't like RAW, they don't watch. TNA's problem is not enough people know about it. |
|
|
|
Post by mdf2349 on Mar 23, 2010 17:01:35 GMT -5
I kinda agree with you that it was a good show. But the lower the ratings get; the less time we have to watch the good show that we like. The sad thing is; is Vince has brainwashed his fans into thinking that his show is good. The WWE fans don't know what good really is. yeah its Vince McMahon fault not the fact that tna and spike tv have done a crapjob of promting the move to monday nights take last night for exampe you had rvd and jeff hardy in the main event last night and they didn't even bother to advertise it |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Mar 23, 2010 17:22:26 GMT -5
I kinda agree with you that it was a good show. But the lower the ratings get; the less time we have to watch the good show that we like. The sad thing is; is Vince has brainwashed his fans into thinking that his show is good. The WWE fans don't know what good really is. yeah its Vince McMahon fault not the fact that tna and spike tv have done a poop job of promting the move to monday nights take last night for exampe you had rvd and jeff hardy in the main event last night and they didn't even bother to advertise it You know this has to be the most thought out thing you have ever said haha. |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Mar 23, 2010 17:39:38 GMT -5
I kinda agree with you that it was a good show. But the lower the ratings get; the less time we have to watch the good show that we like. The sad thing is; is Vince has brainwashed his fans into thinking that his show is good. The WWE fans don't know what good really is. yeah its Vince McMahon fault not the fact that tna and spike tv have done a poop job of promting the move to monday nights take last night for exampe you had rvd and jeff hardy in the main event last night and they didn't even bother to advertise it Really? Of all the examples you could've used.. THATS it? It's a match that was made DURING the show. No craptheir not gonna advertise that.. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 7:24:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2010 17:49:06 GMT -5
yeah its Vince McMahon fault not the fact that tna and spike tv have done a poop job of promting the move to monday nights take last night for exampe you had rvd and jeff hardy in the main event last night and they didn't even bother to advertise it Really? Of all the examples you could've used.. THATS it? It's a match that was made DURING the show. No poop their not gonna advertise that.. Technically the Foley/JJ match was made during the show, but they advertised a loser leaves tna match in commercials prior to the show. |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Mar 23, 2010 17:49:51 GMT -5
They dont need to say what it is, but be like Jeff Hardy and RVD in action! Or something.
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Mar 23, 2010 17:51:48 GMT -5
I dont think it has much to do with the advertising. It is what it is. People expect these 4.0 numbers for both company's like in the 90's . It's not gonna happen. TNA has consistently shown they have around 1.0 viewers, WWE has shown between 3.0 and 3.5. These numbers, on occasion, spike higher. As I've been saying TNA needs to just focus on putting out a good product and not so much the numbers. Comparatively WWE's go home show BEFORE Wrestlemania was down...Now if this doesn't underscore my point about not worrying about the ratings then I dont know what does:
Last night's WWE Raw drew a surprisingly low 3.24 rating, which was down 12.6 percent from last week's strong 3.71 rating for "Stone Cold" Steve Austin guest-hosting the show.
Raw's TV viewership was also way down to 4.51 million viewers, which is a 19.5 percent drop from last week's show with 5.60 million viewers.
The 3.24 overall rating was the lowest since a 3.18 rating for the universally-panned December 21, 2009 episode. Viewership was the lowest since November 2009.
The first hour started weak with 4.14 million viewers, which was the fewest first hour viewers since October 27, 2008.
credit: pwtorch
|
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Mar 23, 2010 17:57:27 GMT -5
Really? Of all the examples you could've used.. THATS it? It's a match that was made DURING the show. No poop their not gonna advertise that.. Technically the Foley/JJ match was made during the show, but they advertised a loser leaves tna match in commercials prior to the show. But, they didn't say who was in it. It could've been anywhere especially considering how people were saying it was Morgan/Hernandez. There's a big difference in saying "Loser Leaves TNA!" and saying "Jeff Hardy & Rob Van Dam Team Up To Take on BEER MONEY!"  |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Mar 23, 2010 18:00:24 GMT -5
Correct me if I'm wrong here but dont WWE and TNA go by these exact same ratings. So they cant just not worry about ratings because these ratings tell you how your doing. And when TNA was about to go to Monday nights, all of Dixie's and Hogans interviews were about the ratings.
|
|
|
|
Post by spearjack24 on Mar 23, 2010 18:04:12 GMT -5
I still think that the low ratings for both shows has to do a lot with the flipper's and the dvr's. Both shows have dropped in ratings, but with when and if they do climb; it's minimal!
|
|
|
|
Post by Byron F'N Saxton Fan on Mar 23, 2010 18:13:38 GMT -5
yeah its Vince McMahon fault not the fact that tna and spike tv have done a poop job of promting the move to monday nights take last night for exampe you had rvd and jeff hardy in the main event last night and they didn't even bother to advertise it Really? Of all the examples you could've used.. THATS it? It's a match that was made DURING the show. No poop their not gonna advertise that.. Maybe TNA should learn to promote Matches well before the show that involve talent like Jeff and RVD and make X Division Matches during the show instead. I know as a casual fan if I had heard Jeff and RVD promoted for a week or so I would be intrigued about that more-so than I would be about Hernandez vs. Matt Morgan. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 7:24:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2010 18:25:58 GMT -5
Technically the Foley/JJ match was made during the show, but they advertised a loser leaves tna match in commercials prior to the show. But, they didn't say who was in it. It could've been anywhere especially considering how people were saying it was Morgan/Hernandez. There's a big difference in saying "Loser Leaves TNA!" and saying "Jeff Hardy & Rob Van Dam Team Up To Take on BEER MONEY!" Yeah, I totally agree with your point, I was just stating that they did somewhat announce a match that wasn't officially made until the show started. |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Mar 24, 2010 0:46:15 GMT -5
Oh BTW, they are advertising the 6 man Tag in a Steel Cage when on Impact they said it was just a 6 man.
*Semi Spoiler*
Jeff Hardy announces it as a steel cage match DURING Impact next week.
|
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Mar 24, 2010 1:44:51 GMT -5
Oh BTW, they are advertising the 6 man Tag in a Steel Cage when on Impact they said it was just a 6 man. *Semi Spoiler* Jeff Hardy announces it as a steel cage match DURING Impact next week. There's still a major difference between advertising a change to a pre-announced match, then spoiling that Beer Money would attack Jarrett and Hardy/Van Dam would make the save. |
|
|
|
Post by Overnight Sensation on Mar 24, 2010 15:40:00 GMT -5
they didnt have to say Beer Money attacking Jarrett man.
simply say, "In Action will be the Whole F'n Show Rob Van Dam and for the first time in over a year The charismatic Enigma Jeff Hardy"
but yes they need to promote that 6 man as a steel cage
|
|
|
|
Post by 1992 on Mar 24, 2010 19:47:07 GMT -5
In all honesty, if you tell wrestling fans "hey look over here, this is a big deal!", then throw in two big name like Hardy and RVD, with some "statistics" like "see RVD and Jeff Hardy together in action together for the first time in ____ years" or "Jeff Hardy live on free TV for the first time in nearly ___ months!" and at least TRY and make something feel big, a few days before it happens, it will at the least make people curious, hell they might even say "Well the first time in ____ months? I might wanna see this...who knows if they're gonna even wrestle again for a while?"
And don't give me any "They made this during the show! Beer Money spoilers!!!" bull****, you're just trying to be contrary.
NOWHERE did what I just said spoil a thing, hell if you word it properly it almost sounds like they might be facing each other, it leaves them wondering. People like seeing something they think is big, advertising names like RVD, Hardy, etc. as being in the main event 4-5 days in between shows would do no harm to anyone. If TNA can drop the big bucks on contracts for these guys, they need to set aside an old pickle jar with an "Advertisement Money" label on it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Byron F'N Saxton Fan on Apr 6, 2010 17:03:14 GMT -5
MNW Ratings 4/5/10:
RAW - 3.2
Impact 0.9
Movin' on up.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Apr 6, 2010 17:05:59 GMT -5
im in shock
|
|
|
|
Post by JDSFullmetal on Apr 6, 2010 17:10:01 GMT -5
And everyone was saying this was one of the worst impacts of all time.
ZOMBIE HOT STRIPPING = rating's!!!!!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 7:24:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2010 17:13:25 GMT -5
And everyone was saying this was one of the worst impacts of all time. It was. |
|
