|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jan 16, 2010 1:34:08 GMT -5
The 1/14 edition of Impact, the first in its regular spot with the acquisition of Hulk Hogan, did a 1.3 rating (rounded up from a 1.26). It looks like Hogan has spurred some interest in the product.
The 1/14 edition of TNA Epics did a 0.7 rating
PWInsider.com
-----
Pretty good ratings.
|
|
eddie eddie
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 17, 2009 17:54:26 GMT -5
Posts: 2,873
|
Post by eddie eddie on Jan 16, 2010 1:38:31 GMT -5
hey, it's an improvement from usual thursdays!
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 16, 2010 1:42:01 GMT -5
.15 or so increase isn't what I'd call spurring some interest. Now, if they had never gotten past a 1 before, then maybe, but still, nothing spectacular.
That's not good, dropping half your rating.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 30, 2024 1:52:44 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2010 1:44:11 GMT -5
TNA needs to get that 2.0 rating, seriously.
I honestly think the ratings were mostly to people wanting to see "What Hogan will do next". That'll work for a few weeks, but won't keep the ratings consistent.
- Triple S
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Wrestling on Jan 16, 2010 1:48:50 GMT -5
I was wondering how could they get a better rating on a Monday night, but yeah, I think they need to stop taping and do live shows on Thursdays.
|
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jan 16, 2010 1:53:18 GMT -5
I doubt the rating will go up unless it's live to be honest. The spoilers were out there for around 2 weeks.
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jan 16, 2010 2:30:01 GMT -5
Live on thursday would be good. There's really no excuse not to. At least it's a 1.3 which is better then b4 hogan came in.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 16, 2010 2:33:33 GMT -5
Live on thursday would be good. There's really no excuse not to. At least it's a 1.3 which is better then b4 hogan came in. They've had 1.3 before, so it's not like they can't do it. Wait a few weeks and see if it sustains itself before calling it a victory. |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jan 16, 2010 3:53:54 GMT -5
Live on thursday would be good. There's really no excuse not to. At least it's a 1.3 which is better then b4 hogan came in. They've had 1.3 before, so it's not like they can't do it. Wait a few weeks and see if it sustains itself before calling it a victory. I didnt call it a victory and I meant the previous weeks before Hogan came in when they were getting .8,.9, 1.0. The last time they got a 1.3 i believe was in Sept/Oct? |
|
HoganBai
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 15, 2004 15:06:24 GMT -5
Posts: 4,682
|
Post by HoganBai on Jan 16, 2010 14:48:49 GMT -5
Wow, just what I thought, the first chance TNA has to show they can improve (1/4 was the showcase, this was to see who hopped onto Team TNA) and what happened? 1.3
It is a shame, there's a LOT of talented guys there and on occasion, I like TNA. But it's obvious bringing in Hogan did pretty much nothing. So hopefully the "TNA will be a major player" stuff will die down for a while, at least until their next big-name signing.
|
|
