|
|
Post by LtD73 on Feb 10, 2010 4:25:07 GMT -5
We reported several weeks ago that The Undertaker is currently working through a lot of pain, and a new report by F4WOnline.com is confirming that 'Taker is indeed still having several pain issues in the ring. The feeling right now is that The Undertaker will be working a much lighter schedule heading into Wrestlemania 26 as WWE wants to ensure that he can wrestle at his best on the PPV.
There has also been talking of taking the title off the waist of The Undertaker prior to WrestleMania, as WWE management does not think that a title needs to be on the line for an Undertaker vs Shawn Michaels match. The creative team feels that there's enough drawing power in a non-title match between the two veterans, and that the company might be able to draw more with a separate title match on the WrestleMania card.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Feb 10, 2010 4:29:19 GMT -5
I dont want to see HBK/Undertaker II but if we must, it has to be a title match. No match is going to top them just like last year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Focalin on Feb 10, 2010 4:31:41 GMT -5
KEEP THE TITLE ON THE UNDERTAKER. he's NEVER been defending champion and that would add SO MUCH suspense to the match
|
|
TTF4eva
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 4, 2009 6:13:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,016
|
Post by TTF4eva on Feb 10, 2010 4:52:18 GMT -5
Tbh, there shouldnt be another HBK/Taker. One thing, they would be exhausted again, then they have another break like they had last year, two, lets keep last years match original and unique. If anything, Taker should be champ going into the match.
|
|
|
|
Post by AdamBomb on Feb 10, 2010 5:04:55 GMT -5
PUNK FOR FOUR TIME WORLD CHAMP.
...OR Jericho for SIX TIME WORLD CHAMP! Either, way I'm happy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Feb 10, 2010 5:28:39 GMT -5
They are really missing out on a big chance to have Triple H V Shawn Michaels V Undertaker.
Just because Undertaker V Shawn Michaels was so great last year, they don't need to milk it and have the exact same match again at this years Wrestlemania. I understand the logic in having it non-title and then a seperate title Match, but I'd much prefer it if it was for the title.
Can't they just do;
WWE Championship
Triple H V Shawn Michaels V Undertaker
World Heavyweight Championship
Chris Jericho V Edge
|
|
TTF4eva
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 4, 2009 6:13:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,016
|
Post by TTF4eva on Feb 10, 2010 5:59:47 GMT -5
They are really missing out on a big chance to have Triple H V Shawn Michaels V Undertaker. Just because Undertaker V Shawn Michaels was so great last year, they don't need to milk it and have the exact same match again at this years Wrestlemania. I understand the logic in having it non-title and then a seperate title Match, but I'd much prefer it if it was for the title. Can't they just do; WWE Championship
Triple H V Shawn Michaels V Undertaker
World Heavyweight Championship
Chris Jericho V Edge[/b] Thats what im hoping too |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 3:45:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2010 9:27:45 GMT -5
i would love to see a triple threat at 'mania but i don't want the streak to be ended. the way it's looking now is that HBK is going to come out and have the best match of his life and maybe get one more run as champion
|
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Feb 10, 2010 10:03:38 GMT -5
I don't think WWE has good enough writers to come up with a realistic scenario for Undertaker losing the title.
The Undertaker should NEVER just be pinned clean. It should always be with heavy interference or like when they bury him or set him on fire or something.
He's the Undertaker, you don't just PIN him. His character can summon lightning bolts to come down and fry your ass, he's not just going to let himself get pinned. That's why I hated when Kozlov just pinned him out of nowhere and then Triple H beat him in the EC last year.
Undertaker should pretty much never lose just out of pure continuity. If he loses at the EC and then goes into "unbeatable mode" at Wrestlemania, it makes no sense because except for Jericho and MAYBE Punk everybody in the EC us a schlub. SO if he loses in the EC and then beats HBK who is a 100 times better at WM, it makes no sense why he would lose to lesser wrestlers a month earlier.
|
|
Hedgehulk
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 12, 2003 15:41:42 GMT -5
Posts: 1,856
|
Post by Hedgehulk on Feb 10, 2010 10:06:31 GMT -5
I think that Edge should be the one to end Undertaker's WM streak not HBGay! I mean, we already know that HBGay is going to the Hall of Fame, so how many more accolades does he need? The guy ended Ric Flairs WWE career 2 years ago! It's time to let another guy shine for once and put HBGay out to pasture.
|
|
Wuffles
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
Joined on: Jan 19, 2002 13:11:50 GMT -5
Posts: 4,976
|
Post by Wuffles on Feb 10, 2010 11:23:34 GMT -5
I think that Edge should be the one to end Undertaker's WM streak not HBGay! I mean, we already know that HBGay is going to the Hall of Fame, so how many more accolades does he need? The guy ended Ric Flairs WWE career 2 years ago! It's time to let another guy shine for once and put HBGay out to pasture. I was unaware that today was 5th Grade day on WF... |
|
|
|
Post by The Future on Feb 10, 2010 11:25:37 GMT -5
I think that Edge should be the one to end Undertaker's WM streak not HBGay! I mean, we already know that HBGay is going to the Hall of Fame, so how many more accolades does he need? The guy ended Ric Flairs WWE career 2 years ago! It's time to let another guy shine for once and put HBGay out to pasture. I was unaware that today was 5th Grade day on WF... But wait- don't you get this brilliant, high-wit humor? Instead of his third initial, he used a derogatory term for homosexuals. Get it? Because it rhymes with 'K'. It's uproariously good taste. |
|
jonmc999
Superstar
Everybody Has their Price Everybodys going to Pay as the MILLION DOLLAR PRINCESS always gets Her WAY
Joined on: Jun 27, 2007 1:50:52 GMT -5
Posts: 524
|
Post by jonmc999 on Feb 10, 2010 11:33:13 GMT -5
No one should end the streak. Somthing like this will never happen again. The undertaker only has a year or so left in him leave the streak and have him beat whoever either shawn Hunter or edge although I would prefer a one on one match never really been a fan of triple threats
|
|
|
|
Post by wabarrett on Feb 10, 2010 11:34:00 GMT -5
Well I know I'm in a minority, but I am still hoping to see this match. I cannot believe that people are this desperate for the match not to happen... it CAN top last year, whether it will or not has yet to be seen. But if people are this reluctant to see the biggest rematch ever, then they simply couldn't have enjoyed the first one enough.
Also, answer me this people... A lot of you are arguing that this rematch shouldn't happen because it could be one of Undertaker's final 'Manias and therefore he should have a different opponent (so that it isn't wasted on a match that's already been done before etc.). BUT... I've seen people say that Undertaker vs. Sheamus would be a better choice!?
What. The. Hell?
|
|
|
|
Post by yankeesforever on Feb 10, 2010 11:34:34 GMT -5
I don't think WWE has good enough writers to come up with a realistic scenario for Undertaker losing the title. The Undertaker should NEVER just be pinned clean. It should always be with heavy interference or like when they bury him or set him on fire or something. He's the Undertaker, you don't just PIN him. His character can summon lightning bolts to come down and fry your ass, he's not just going to let himself get pinned. That's why I hated when Kozlov just pinned him out of nowhere and then Triple H beat him in the EC last year. Undertaker should pretty much never lose just out of pure continuity. If he loses at the EC and then goes into "unbeatable mode" at Wrestlemania, it makes no sense because except for Jericho and MAYBE Punk everybody in the EC us a schlub. SO if he loses in the EC and then beats HBK who is a 100 times better at WM, it makes no sense why he would lose to lesser wrestlers a month earlier. Because he's gonna be facing 5 other opponents . If they all gang up on him , they can eliminate him. Or HBK can come in and distracted him |
|
robby.blade
Main Eventer
64 Refs
Joined on: Jan 16, 2007 13:52:35 GMT -5
Posts: 4,382
|
Post by robby.blade on Feb 10, 2010 12:21:15 GMT -5
I'd really rather not see HBK Vs. 'Taker again this year at Mania, but 'Taker being champion going in to Mania would be sick, but then where does that leave Edge? Edge should be facing Jericho for the title, not anyone else.
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Wrestling on Feb 10, 2010 12:38:26 GMT -5
Well I know I'm in a minority, but I am still hoping to see this match. I cannot believe that people are this desperate for the match not to happen... it CAN top last year, whether it will or not has yet to be seen. But if people are this reluctant to see the biggest rematch ever, then they simply couldn't have enjoyed the first one enough. Also, answer me this people... A lot of you are arguing that this rematch shouldn't happen because it could be one of Undertaker's final 'Manias and therefore he should have a different opponent (so that it isn't wasted on a match that's already been done before etc.). BUT... I've seen people say that Undertaker vs. Sheamus would be a better choice!? What. The. Hell? I don't want it again because both have a lot to lose. Look at it: Undertaker just can't lose, his streak must continue, and Shawn can't lose AGAIN for the second straight year. |
|
|
|
Post by wabarrett on Feb 10, 2010 12:42:32 GMT -5
The problem with the Triple H, Undertaker and Shawn Michaels situation is that one of them is bound to be lumbered in a match with Sheamus... most likely Triple H.
I mean, Cena and Batista have just started a rivalry that could and probably will lead them to WrestleMania. Bret Hart and Vince is destined to happen. The grounds for Edge vs Jericho are there too, along with Money in the Bank (surely), and perhaps a Tag Team titles and/ or Women's title match. Where does that leave these three? Undertaker vs Michaels and then Triple H having to take on Sheamus? Michaels and Triple H facing off and then Undertaker ending up going against him?
Triple H vs. Sheamus and Undertaker vs. Sheamus are two matches I don't wanna see.
|
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Feb 10, 2010 13:00:53 GMT -5
Thank god, I hated the idea of a title match between the two. It's totally unnecessary, and it makes Jericho/Edge that much more likely.
|
|
|
|
Post by BuckDenaro7: Elite Trader on Feb 10, 2010 13:23:16 GMT -5
I personally think iot would be so over if they did this and Ted DiBiase sr. was in HBKs corner and paid to have Taker lay down and retire the streak
|
|
